Summary Of Is Google Making USupid By Nicholas Carr

Comparative Analysis In a world of rapid technological advancements, the use of technology has become a presence found everywhere. Many smart devices and large screens of bright lights have engulfed the human population, including day-to-day living. However, there have been conflicting reports on whether or not the influence of technology is a benefit to human knowledge or a detriment to it and the remnants of traditional learning. In the article, “Is Google Making Us Stupid,” author Nicholas Carr insists that the use of technology and specifically the internet can alter the brain’s neurology, which in turn can lead to negative side effects on the body. On the other hand, in the article, “The ‘Google’ Paradox: Is Technology Making Us Smarter,”

He supports this claim with personal stories and scientific research. For instance, Carr states, "Over the past few years I've had an uncomfortable sense that someone, or something, has been tinkering with my brain, remapping the neural circuitry, reprogramming the memory" (Carr). He is including his personal account in addition to scientific research to add a feeling of concern on how technology has been affecting him. Conversely, Harris argues that technology, including Google, can improve learning and cognitive abilities. He provides examples of technology's positive impact on learning experiences, such as, "In classrooms, students are engaging with technology in ways they never have before. They are using tools like Google to access information, collaborate with peers, and create digital content" (Harris). Harris, on the other hand, is adding a feeling of thankfulness and acceptance towards technology as he has found the benefits of the internet. Carr relies on personal anecdotes and scientific research to support his

Harris is embracing the benefits of technology and how it is leading to students becoming more proficient in their studies, leading them to retaining more information while also being engaged. The narrative approach Carr takes prompts reflection on the effects of technology on cognition but may lack generalizability. For example, Carr highlights, "Anecdotes alone don't prove much." And we still await the long-term neurological and psychological experiments that will provide a definitive picture of how Internet use affects cognition" (Carr). The author makes note that although there is research on the subject, there is more information to be found to determine if and how the internet affects the body. Harris' comprehensive analysis offers a balanced perspective on the benefits and drawbacks of technology, even if it may overlook potential downsides. Harris acknowledges, "Of course, technology is not a panacea." There are challenges associated with its use, including concerns about distraction, privacy, and equity of access"