In The Nightingale by Lauren Slater in pages 330-370,Isabelle and Vianne have found them self in some trouble. Vianne has Sturmbannfuhrer Von Richter billeting at her house. He in nothing like Captain Beck, Ritcher is cruel and abuses his power. He has come to question Viannne now; Henri Navarre has been captured and suspects Vianna is lying about her acquaintance with him. Isabelle is also in a world of trouble, as Isabelle was in a safe house with some airman the SS agent’s and Gestapo rushed in the house and took Isabelle and the airman as hostages.
This story is about a young girl named Anna Fitzgerald. Her sister Has Leukemia. Anna was made to serve her sister/keep her alive. Since Anna was a young child she has been made to give bone marrow, blood and organs to her sister.
The issue at hand for the U.S 77th Congress (Historical Crisis Committee) to address is the extent to which the U.S should involve itself in the second greatest war that had erupted since the first global-scale war in 1914. As Joseph H. Ball, I solemnly swear to maintain and carry out my exclusive duties in benefitting America and its citizens to the best of my ability, as a senator of the U.S. 77th Congress. P1-Past: After starting to recover from the 1930s depression, Hitler and his alliances with Italy and Japan started another war, despite the Treaty of Versailles, restricting Germany from doing any harm. In fact, the Treaty of Versailles, which had strictly reduced Germany to poverty and massive debt, caused their retaliation with the
Chapter 4 Protagonist/s: Marie-Laure LeBlanc/ Werner Pfennig Antagonists: Germans Time: 8th August 1944 Setting: Saint-Malo, France Summary:
“1939: Countdown to War” by Richard Overy is an account and analysis of the build-up to the Second World War. The analysis is centered around Poland, and Overy describes the events of Danzig as the reason for the declaration of war. The book looks at the final week leading up to the war, “the war of nerves”. However, Overy also outlines other causes for the start of the war, the main one being both sides believed they were in the right. The book holds interest by cutting back and forth between Germany, Poland, Britain and France, and includes references that are often from personal journals and private papers which gives an honest insight into the opinions of both important participants and public opinion.
Around the 1900’s King George VI gave a speech to his country because of hitler 's pompous lies so therefore the King has to speak to his nation and let them be aware of the situation that they all are facing.. Later on King George VI uses a reassuring and compassionate tone in order to develop the idea that despite the war’s outcome will be in there favor. within this speech which was given on September 3rd 1939 it states “ It is to this high purpose that I now call my people at home and my peoples across the seas, who will make our cause their own. I ask them to stand calm, firm, and united in this time of trial.” this quote exemplifies how King George VI is reassuring the people by showing that he took matters into his own hands but is asking others for help to make sure the go through this war and make it out spiffy clean.
The social effects of World War I in France and
World War I is often overshadowed by the appalling tragedy of World War II. This world-changing conflict is viewed simply as a fight between developed countries. However, the little-known story of French army mutinies, hidden by the French and British governments, is an example of conflict within the troops themselves during the Great War. Although only a small occurrence in the scope of the war, this single event drastically changed the path of the war and has a lasting impact in history.
• French military strategy was outdated, as it continued to use defensive strategies used during World War I. The most outspoken aspect was the French reliance on the Maginot defense line. Historians such as Robert Foley and Gary Sheffield believe that the Maginot Line’s failure to cover the Belgian-Franco Ardennes was symptomatic of a general unpreparedness, which allowed Germany to take full advantage. Having revived diplomatic negotiations between Belgium and the Allies in 1939, France was allowed troops to advance to the Dyle River in Belgium,.
In response to this action that frankly broke the laws the League of Nations set for Germany, France and Britain only appeased these ations. France and Britain had let Germany carry out their aggressions in order to keep peace (German Expansion, Hitler’s expansion). Similar to the events that had happened in 1936, in 1938 the Germans
Essentially, even though French and Germans were enemies during WWII, and only one country ended up winning, they both received negative outcomes from the
During the war, many people lost their lives, through volunteering or enlistment in the armed forces, battling the militaries of other nations for a complicated cause. The war ended with just as much complexity. Bringing a new age of peace required careful consideration of reparations due as well as what steps could be taken to prevent future conflict. Perhaps these issues were not handled in the best way possible, but the future has the opportunity to look back and judge those who already made their choices. When stepping into the mindset of a person in this time, whether German or British, civilian or officer, there seems a pervading sense of patriotism which lent itself to The Great War as well as its
On June 18, 1940, Charles de Gaulle launched his famous speech on BBC Radio, he encouraged the French to continue combating and fighting against Germany. a few people heard this speech which was the beginning of the French resistance, it was able to support the Allied forces to liberate France in 1945. De Gaulle did not recognize the legitimacy of the French government and did not agree to the truce with Germany then he established an independent government in exile. This speech is a symbol for not bowing.
France’s disinterest with war in the 1930s proved to be a major weakness in its political structure, implicating it in even more violence. France’s political system, characterized for its similarities to Athens, was clearly a reaction the country’s phobia of pugnacity. The culture and military decisions followed suit, erring on the side of pacifism, even when under the direct threat of violence from Germany. If France had been vocally willing to engage in violence if necessary, the impression it would have given to Germany would have been stronger, and could have prevented German invasion and violence.
This book provided me with an in-depth analysis of the final months of the Great War. The combination of personal experiences and strategic tactics used by the Triple Entente to combat Germany was especially engaging. The book gave me an opportunity to appreciate the
