ipl-logo

Summary Of Michael Lewis 'The Big Short'

1191 Words5 Pages

Michael Lewis’ novel The Big Short examines the build-up of the housing market and the credit bubble during the late 1990’s and early 2000’s which ultimately led up to the financial crisis and the collapse of the housing market from 2007 to 2010. This novel holds an almost dickenesque quality to it with many key players some of whom are heroes and some of whom are villains, all of which play a crucial part within a portion of our history that many people saw as a ‘Doomsday’ of sorts. In order to understand the novel and the issues presented within in more depth I intend to present the issues that the novel addressed and then to examine those issues through the lenses of three historically famous economists; Karl Marx, John Maynard Keynes, …show more content…

Keynesian economists often argue against the private sector, and that decisions made by and within the private sector can lead to inefficient macroeconomic outcomes which in turn require a public response. If Keynes was to analyse Lewis’ novel he would say that this is a perfect representation of how the private sector can on occasion fail leading to macroeconomic crises’. In this case Keynes would argue that the private sector and the macho members of Wall Street were the sole contributors to the creation of the housing market bubble. When this bubble popped and the North American continent went into a recession, which Keynes would argue was the macroeconomic backlash on both a local scale and an international scale, as the ripples from this could be felt would wide. Keynes would argue that because capitalism has will always have a private market, it is a system that is ultimately doomed to failure and is doomed to constant cycles with peaks of success and valleys of recession and failure. In Keynesian economics this is why capitalism is a system that will always fail and will always lead to recession or in more extreme cases depression. With this knowledge, Keynesian economics has often had an uprising in popularity after failures in capitalism like the great depression of the 1930’s, after WWII, or after the 2008 economic recession. With that said however humans are designed to consume and so we go back to capitalism when things steady out again. Keynes would argue that the 2008 crises is the prime example of human nature and how this need to consume paints itself over our economic practises. Keynes would also show that this nature is why thus far in humanity there has yet to be a system of economic thought and practise that has proved to work in a manner that is efficient and concise enough to prove to be

Show More
Related
203 Words | 1 Pages

The charge about the old days of the American economy—the nineteenth century, the “Gilded Age,” the era of the “robber barons”—was that it was always beset by a cycle of boom and bust. Whatever nice runs of expansion and opportunity that did come, they always seemed to be coupled with a pretty cataclysmic depression right around the corner. Boom and bust, boom and bust—this was the necessary pattern of the American economy in its primitive state. In the US, in the modern era, all this was smoothed out.

Read More
3465 Words | 14 Pages

He then explains how in the past, Theodore Roosevelet tried the same solution and caused the Great Depression. The author, Nicholas Veron, explains the situation about the collapse of the Silicon Valley Bank. He then goes into detail

Read More
994 Words | 4 Pages

The excessive spending came to a breaking point when investors traded about sixteen million shares on the New York Stock Exchange in all but one day. Billions of dollars went down the drain in result of the trades and thousands of investors went bankrupt. Speculators got a rude awakening once they lost all of their money in hopes of gaining more. Harry J. Carmen considers speculation as “the final development that set the stage for the collapse of American prosperity” (Doc 5). So much chaos happened in so little time due to speculation and that was just one reason behind the economy collapsing.

Read More
1574 Words | 7 Pages

The Stock Market Crash of 1929 fell with a domino effect, driving people out of businesses, causing employers to fire workers because of money shortage, consequently, those workers to go broke and become homeless, and eventually setting the country into the hardly-reversible state of hardships that came with the Great Depression. Quite obviously, the country was impoverished. Panic arose as people started to withdraw all their savings from the banks as soon as they heard that the stock market had plunged, trying to keep their money safe and secure, manually. After breaking down the core issues of the Depression in his “Fireside Chat”, Roosevelt claimed, “I can assure you that it is safer to keep your money in a reopened bank than under the mattress.” This advice stuck with many after hearing their president speak so knowledgeably about the matter.

Read More
1037 Words | 5 Pages

Before the Great Depression, the classical liberal ideology of limited government intervention in the economy and of individual self-reliance framed Republican and Democratic literacies on the economy. This ideology asserted that the natural tendency of markets was towards equilibrium. After the stock market crash of 1929, though, Republican President Herbert Hoover and his party became responsive to the demands of the electorate for the country’s workers and investors, as people experienced a growing abyss between the benefits they felt were their due and the actual conditions of their lives. Given that predicted outcomes differed markedly from the actual conditions of life, President Franklin D. Roosevelt – from the onset of the New Deal – asserted that the federal government must intervene to positively affect the ‘result’ (Foner 821). By institutionalizing this novel ideology he embedded the ‘precedent’ that in times of crisis, particularly economic crisis, the requirements of the public welfare of the American ‘people’ must trump the tenets of

Read More
263 Words | 2 Pages

4. Government branches, or namely the Federal Reserve, make economic policies like monetary and fiscal policy to adjust our economy, and social policy affected by the aftermath of new policies: if new economic policy end in a better economy, then the later governments will incorporate that idea into their set of social policies. Also, if there is an economic crisis, then the economic policy used to counter that is likely to stay for years until someone is brave enough to change it, and if that change results in big market fluctuations, it will stay longer. According to our book, one of the examples of major economic ideas that change the social policy is John Maynard Keynes’s idea: by adjusting the amount of government spending, the government

Read More
1877 Words | 8 Pages

The reader so far could gather that globalsim that globalism is a wide spread movement that began it grip on the nation predominately during the mid 20th century, but even to this very day globalism is on the offensive. Most modern day Americans are probably familiar with the Subprime Mortage crisis of ‘08 and for those who are not: in 2008 the U.S. economy’s real estate market suffered from a collapse due to Chase Bank unwarily handing out risky loans that would, realistical, be left unpaid due to people inability to require funds. Being the Federal Reserve’s job to maintain the economy the private bank is ultimately the cause of this economic crises. Before going into an explanation of the crisis one must understand that, through the words of Richard H. Timberlake (2008) “...a particular market instability can be contained only if Federal Reserve policy maintains monetary equilibrium, the principle it abandoned in 1929[The Gold Standard].” Timberlake also mentions in this text that market can, and sometimes, will return to the equilibrium.

Read More
438 Words | 2 Pages

The biggest enemy to the end of the financial crisis and the beginning of an economic recovery is Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson himself. Lets forget for a minute that the decision by Paulson and Bernanke to let Lehman Brothers fail was the precipitating event leading to credit markets freezing up and the first round of financial panic. Since then, the two have been working diligently to correct this collosal mistake. But separating actions from words, we see that words are in fact much more potent. Since the end of September, every time Henry Paulson has opened his month, the Dow has dropped on average 196 points.

Read More
1799 Words | 8 Pages

There were very few economists who successfully predicted the 2008 economic crisis, but there are many of them who are good at introspection. The large number of books published after the crisis is a good proof, Professor Ha-Joon Chang’s book 23 Things They Don’t Tell You about Capitalism is one of them. Ha-Joon Chang is a currently a professor in the Political Economy of Development at the University of Cambridge. Chang writes this book to tell people some of the truths about capitalism, to let the readers know how capitalism works and how to make capitalism work better.

Read More
84 Words | 1 Pages

In November 2008, Queen Elizabeth II visited the LSE and during this visit she asked the question that has been bearing in minds of people since the outbreak of the 2008 financial crisis: ‘How come nobody could foresee it?’ Ha-Joon Chang in 23 Things They Don’t Tell You about Capitalism states that the neo-liberal economist has created this catastrophic financial crash. Besides this, Chang is his myth-busting bestseller tells us couple of other "things" about the various aspects of free-market economy and its limitations.

Read More
1203 Words | 5 Pages

Friedrich A. Hayek is often rejected because of the ideological aspect of his most known works (Gamble, 1996), especially The Road to Serfdom. Nevertheless, he provides strong arguments within debates on whether markets and businesses should be regulated or not, or the traditional political left and right. In fact, as of late, his thought has become useful to investigate, considering the occurrence of the 2008 financial crisis, its consequences, the slow recovery that most western nations have experienced, and seemingly growing global wealth inequalities. He represents the liberal side of the fundamental opposition within political economy, and presents challenging arguments that this author finds should be assessed, as they

Read More
551 Words | 3 Pages

While Keynes and Hayek had several common economic philosophical beliefs and thoughts that include what a society that is civilized is, the two economists also had key differences in their economic philosophical thoughts and these include their view on the monetary system. Some of the differences are discussed as follows. One of the differences in the economic beliefs and thoughts of Hayek and Keynes is that Hayek mainly perceived the markets as having the capability to fix themselves, in instances where they experience shocks, by making the most of competitive forces (Keynes, 108-113). In this matter, Hayek also considered the Central Bank and government’s policies-based efforts meant to restore the growth of the economy as being the cause of instability. Keynes on the other hand, perceived the macroeconomic systems as being increasingly liable to the periodic falls in the demand, and as result considered the conventional micro economic adjustment mechanisms including the price declines and wages as being ineffective in the fixing of economic growth, as well as prosperity (Backhouse, 65-67).

Read More
1562 Words | 7 Pages

He developed a strain to the liberalist ideology called the Keynesian theory of economics, commonly known as Keynesianism. Keynesianism believed that there is a positive role for the state to play in domestic affairs as well as international affairs. His views were mostly influenced by the problems caused by major events such as World War I and The Great Depression. Keynes’s ideas continued to be popular throughout tough periods like World War II, until the 1970s. Keynes believed that the Great Depression was evidence that the invisible hands, as labelled by Smith, sometimes stumbles in disastrous ways.

Read More
1221 Words | 5 Pages

The Big Short Management and Leadership Theoretical Component Management – The process of dealing with or controlling things or people. Leadership - The action of leading a group of people or an organization, or the ability to do this. Management and Leadership are two very different things. “A manager is appointed in a position of authority which enables him to insist on people doing as he/she instructs.

Read More
989 Words | 4 Pages

His book titled “The General Theory of Employment Interest and Money” was published in 1936 i.e. during the Great Depression and became the basis of modern macroeconomics. Keynes supports government intervention during economic turmoil in the capitalist economy. Keynes believed that it was the role of the state to build a bridge between the economy’s potential and its actual output during any financial crisis. His book “General Theory” was written during the period of great depression and was mainly the product of his prolonged study of unemployment in Britain. The post World War II era witnessed abrupt changes in the area of economic development.

Read More

More about Summary Of Michael Lewis 'The Big Short'

Related Topics

Open Document