In the 1800s, women in the United States were refused many of the rights accessible to men. One of the many rights was the right to vote. In protest to the voting laws, a brave woman by the name of Susan B. Anthony fought for the fights of women. Anthony voted illegally in the presidential election of 1872. Consequently, she was arrested and charged with a $100 fine which she refused to pay. Instead she gave the speech “On Woman’s Right To Vote” to explain and justify her rebellious actions. In her speech, Susan B. Anthony used loaded language and specific techniques to maker her sound experienced, educated and professional. In short, The purpose of Susan B. Anthony’s “On Woman’s Right to Vote” was to prove the necessity of gender equality …show more content…
She included the preamble to the U.S. Constitution which states “We the people” and not “We the white male citizens”. Anthony pointed out that gender equality was a right to the all people and not specifically men. She argued that the government was not democratic towards women. Instead, it acted as a hateful oligarchy of sex. Anthony’s main purpose to delivering her speech was to persuade her listeners to support a constitutional amendment for women’s suffrage and gender equality. When quoting the U.S Constitution, she made a point to mention that there were no restrictions on gender. She concludes her speech by asking “Are women persons?”. Ultimately, with women being persons and citizens, like men, no state in the country has a right to deny them any privileges that are given to …show more content…
Anthony began her speech with a first person point of view. This presented a personal view of the subject. In addition, the use of point of view showed Anthony to be in a position of authority over the subject as she asserted herself. The information she presented in her speech was also presented with clarity due to the use of first person. For a moment, she strayed from her personal point of view and spoke in third person. This shifted the focus from her to women as a whole. This technique forced her audience to think deeper about her message and persuaded her audience to support her