More handpicked essays just for you.
Were the American colonist justified in their decision to declare independence from the British Empire? essay
American History Opposing Viewpoints Project: Part I – Summary on the boston tea party
American History Opposing Viewpoints Project: Part I – Summary on the boston tea party
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
Recommended: Were the American colonist justified in their decision to declare independence from the British Empire? essay
3. The Tea Act made the East India Company’s tea less expensive than Dutch tea, which encouraged Americans to pay the Townshend duty. 4. Radical Patriots accused the ministry of bribing
What was the main reason for the Boston Tea Party, let me explain. The Boston Tea Party was a huge protest against England because England kept taxing the colonists without asking them. England made taxes such as the Navigation acts,Stamp act,Townshend acts,and more over the next 122 years, but the most infuriating act that caused the most important backlash from the colonists was the tea act. The colonists drank a lot of tea,they drank it everyday and when England placed a tax on it the colonists knew they had to do something. What was the cause of the
Dumping 342 containers of tea into the Boston Harbor on December 16, 1773 was just the beginning of the rebellion against paying taxes to Great Britain. As the author and orator of the “Speech to the Second Virginia Convention,” Patrick Henry fights against being “slaves” to Great Britain. Henry utilizes rhetorical strategies such as, ethos, logos, and pathos to persuade Virginia to start the American Revolution. To show the audience that he has credibility, Patrick Henry starts his speech with, ”No man thinks more highly than I do of the patriotism, as well abilities, of the very worthy gentlemen who have just addressed the House” (Henry 1). He tells the audience that he has incredible patriotism for the colonies and that there are worthy gentlemen that have the ability to fight for our country.
During the time period of 1750 to 1776, the colonists, to a moderate extent, identified as American. In determining why a vast majority identified as American and why some didn’t, one must look into detail the social, political and economic standpoints that led to such divide. Throughout all 3 points, Thus, the identification of being “American” and its usage depended on the view the person had of Great Britain. In the economic standpoint, due to the “No taxation without representation” slogan being violated by the British, most of the colonists weren’t against the anti-British sentiment boiling up due to the conflict. The ensuing increase in tax acts later led to the practice of tar and feathering tax collectors, and, to a bigger scale, the Boston tea party.
The events and acts that followed the Boston Tea Party were, and still are very crucial to America and Britain, and their history. They’ve molded the countries into the countries they have become now. Bibliography Primary Sources "Boston Non-Importation Agreement. " Yale Law School, 2008. Accessed November 4, 2016.
However, in 1773, the East India Company noticed that there was an overproduction of tea and its prices surely would decline (“The Third Imperial Crisis”). Tea was one of the, if not the, most valuable asset to many members in Parliament. Britain was forced to impose a new Tea tax on the colonists, which was aimed to keep the price of tea high. Even this act was reasonable in the eyes of the British, but to the colonists, this was just a British way of assuring dominance considering it was now for profit rather than to pay off debts. The response to the Tea Acts was the Boston Tea Party of 1773 (“The Third Imperial Crisis”).
The colonists were still not represented in the British government and didn’t have a say on how the taxes could be done. The colonists wanted the tea returned to England, but it wasn’t and they decided to protest the unfair tax. The Boston Tea Party Was it a big, fun party with tea?
“The American Journey: A History of the United States”, states that colonial leaders came to realize that the most effective way of resistance was to prevent the ships carrying tea from the landing. On December 16, 1773, Boston’s Sons of Liberty disguised themselves as Indians and broke open 34 chests of tea, which they dumped into the harbor. This was significantly a turning point in the American Revolution because, it was one of the first times the American colonists organized and planned to stand up against the injustices Great Britain had done to them. Without the Boston Tea Party the Thirteen Colonies would not have received an immediate reaction out of Parliament, and come to understand that long as they’re a part of Great Britain they will not have independence, “Years of political turmoil inspired colonists to think more systematically about their rights than they had ever done…they were all drawn to resistance.” (The American Journey,
The Boston Tea Party was a violent, courageous, and an eventful act that took place in 1997 because of constant disputes. It started to become a large issue when the British and English colonist constantly disagreed about the unfair taxes that were charged from the British. The colonists didn’t agree to the taxes at all the the government officials formed a plan. The British put such a hefty tax on the tea because they realized the demand was so outrageously high, and they could make a much larger profit off of it. Colonists did not want to pay the huge taxes, so they started buying/smuggling tea from East India, but the British wanted to have the colonists to buy tea from them because of the taxes.
The Tea act received a boycott and also a great deal of violence well. On December 16, 1773, colonial rage resulted in the “Boston Tea Party”. The Sons of Liberty dressed as Native Americans dumped 100 crates of tea into the ocean. Many will say the colonists did the action on their own; though, they needed to carry out an action that would gain the attention of the British. Though, the attention that was gained, was not what the colonists had in
The contradiction in the Boston Tea party is that the tea smugglers in the colonies destroyed the tea for the reason that the new Tea act made the price of Britain’s tea a lower price than
In today’s society, people believe in many superstition. But in order to fully understand superstitions one must learn the roots of superstition and where it came from. The roots of superstition come from the Elizabethan era in Britain. We as people have a tendency to overlook how things came about. We also must learn in steps, or a process what made superstition such a huge component of how people lived in the Elizabethan era.
Intolerable Acts The Intolerable Acts can be viewed as one of the first sparks to the flaming fire of America claiming Independence. The Intolerable Acts, also called the Coercive Acts, were a series of laws passed in 1774 in order to punish the colonies for defying their rule. Four out of five of the Intolerable Acts were directed towards Massachusetts directly and the other was directed at Quebec. All of the Acts were supposed to stop the colonies from defying England’s Rule and show the colonies that England was still in charge.
The boston tea party occurred when colonist as a way of rebelion attack british by throwing the tea that they found in their ships. And some people wonder why they did that and historic events show that there were French Indian War before that make the colonists to have an economic crisis so they can pay for the products. And the unique product that haven’t tax was the tea.
When the British ships arrived in the Boston Harbor The colonist wanted the tea shipped back to England with out payment of tax. Then the royal governor of England insisted on payment of tax. On December 16 a group of men know as the Sons of Liberty disguised there self as Indians and boarded the British ships and dumped all of the tea into the Boston harbor. After that happened parliament passed Coercive Acts. Theses act were put in to place to punish the colonist for dumping the British tea into the Boston harbor.
