ipl-logo

Summary Of The Book 'Fantastic' By Lijphart

869 Words4 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Advantages and disadvantages of Consensus democracy

Fantastic, a book not about sexism or racism in the 21st century. No, the only gap Lijphart is discussing in this book is an empirical one; many academics namely consider majoritarian democracies to be better than consensus democracies without basing this on actual proof (p. 255). With Patterns of Democracy, Lijphart intends to close this gap by describing the different sorts of democratic governments and proving whether or not majoritarian democracies are really exceeding consensus democracies by providing statistical evidence (pp. 255-294). One of his main conclusions is that the many sorts of democratic governments can be reduced to two sorts: the majoritarian and the consensus one (p. 295). Another conclusion is that the general assumption, …show more content…

273) and by showing in chapter 16 that consensus democracies are actually of higher democratic value and implement policies that are attributed to the “kinder gentler nations” (pp. 293-294). The implications he provides can be found in chapter 17. One of these implications is that consensus democracies are better for the culturally divided countries, but also for countries that do not suffer from evident cultural division (p. 296). Lijphart therefore recommends a constitutional reformation for all countries who consider moving to democratic governance, one that would make sure a consensus democracy is implemented (p. …show more content…

He, however, does not back away from being critical or even nuancing his own conclusions. This can be seen when he adds to the conclusion that “it is easier to change governments in consensus democracies” (p. 280) that these changes are not as powerful as they are in majoritarian governments, where governments can completely change after elections (p. 280). By being in favor of a consensus government but not letting himself get too biased on the topic, Lijphart manages to make himself stand out as one of the most critical promoters of the consensus

Show More
Related
1137 Words | 5 Pages

The greatest reform of democracy came from the people pushing the boundaries of what a democracy should be—the Progressive Movement. If there is to be hope of abolishing partisan gerrymandering and bringing true voting equality, or at least moving toward equality, for the first time in U.S. history, it is going to require another social movement, similar to the Progressive

Read More
207 Words | 1 Pages

He argued that the only way we can control this faction which is impossible to remove, is to control the results or consequences. That the country needs to stay under a proper form of government balancing one and other, check and balance. He wanted government elected by many. The idea of faction has been shown in history and

Read More
1439 Words | 6 Pages

(Zinn 90) A country which built a democracy that does not stand for the majority of the people will only create

Read More
512 Words | 3 Pages

He says that a democracy in its roots is a breeding ground for factions. A democracy is too free, he says, and men left alone to govern themselves will inevitably create factions because of the reasons previously stated. He says “there is nothing to check the inducements to sacrifice the weaker party or an obnoxious individual.” However, the government set up by the Constitution is a Republic. A Republic, he argues, must have not too many but also not too few representatives to control factions.

Read More
242 Words | 1 Pages

Darby Leaf Intro to Soc 4/6/17 I am going to start this week’s discussion out by defining the term dictatorship. A dictatorship is a form of government that restricts the right to participation politically to a small group, or even a single individual. A dictatorship could can censor information, and limit suffrage to the public. According to the reading, knowing who officially makes the decisions, says little about how the choices are actually made. Even though there are voting rights in modern day America, the voting rate is surprisingly low, struggling to even reach 60 percent.

Read More
952 Words | 4 Pages

Throughout this document, Alexis De Tocqueville explained to the audience his own interpretation of Democracy in America. At some points, Tocqueville compares the American democracy to the European democracy. Tocqueville begins this document by stating that “In America, the authority exercised by the legislatures is supreme:nothing prevents them from accomplishing their wishes with celerity and with irresistible power, and they are supplied with new representatives every year. ”(Tocqueville pg 257). Tocqueville also points out that America is the country where laws last the shortest time.

Read More
775 Words | 4 Pages

“Is a democracy, such as we know it, the last improvement possible in government? Is it not possible to take a step further towards recognizing and organizing the rights of man? There will never be a really free and enlightened State until the State comes to recognize the individual as a higher and independent power, from which all its own power and authority are derived, and treats him accordingly.” To answer his question democracy is not the last improvement possible as we have witnessed over the years, also we do need to realize why those who are in a power/ higher authority that us get the final decision and we also need to realize that we give them this power to oppress and undermine us so that they are the all

Read More
492 Words | 2 Pages

The continuing struggle to achieve civil rights despite the Civil Rights Movement highlights the ways in which the Madisonian Democratic system is failing in the United States. Madisonian Democracy and a majoritarian understanding of democracy are based on similar ideas but have a distinct and important difference: protection of minorities and individual rights. A majoritarian democracy is one in which the majorities win without consideration for minority rights and is, perhaps, democracy in it’s simplest form – the people or the elected officials vote, and the majority vote wins. A Madisonian Democracy is a composite form of government. Like a majoritarian democracy, the majority opinion holds most the power, however, checks and balances are put in place to ensure a protection of minority and individual rights, as well as minimize the risk of abusive uses of power.

Read More
1828 Words | 8 Pages

Which set of democratic political institutions would likely produce the highest quality republican democracy? Since the constitution of the United States of America are not based on gridlock fundamentals, it should contain the flexibility in the governing and election systems to insure all citizen’s justice, fair living and freedom under fair constitutional laws. According to that prospective and based on alternatives election system distributions, Plurality would be the best choice for US since a debate on which system can fit the modern US political system without any ignores of the founders fundamental of unity and freedom. People today has the power to choose by their direct vote and who well represented them individually to insure the produce of the highest quality republican democracy.

Read More
657 Words | 3 Pages

A majority, held in restraint by constitutional checks and limitations, and always changing easily with deliberate changes of popular opinions and sentiments, is the only true sovereign of a free people. Whoever rejects it, does, of necessity, fly to anarchy or to despotism” (Basler,

Read More
417 Words | 2 Pages

The words we don't say can speak louder than the words we scream. Silence is a powerful force that has the capability to alter people's lives, and the words we speak have becomes unrecognizable in the eyes of people. Within The Chosen, silence is a main theme that is touched upon throughout the book. Comprehending silence can be strenuous because it is not accustomed to our society, but the silence could also have the opportunity to speak to us. Silence can overcome any words given.

Read More
1408 Words | 6 Pages

Scholars from all over the Western world have analyzed and discussed the impact of democracy has had for the citizens of the United States, for over 200 years. Each new period throughout American history, has brought a new concept of being an individual in a democratic society. One flaw scholars from the late nineteenth century saw with democracy was that the majority ruled and if an individual part of the minority their voices were not heard, even if the minority was just and the majority unjust. Thus the democracy most Americans are proud to have is primarily individualistic and can be deemed corrupt because of the focus of majority rule, which might not be the wisest decision. Alexis de Tocqueville was a French writer who wrote several essays on his visit to the United States.

Read More
1155 Words | 5 Pages

A writer for the New York Times, Ross Douthat explains the advantage of the electoral system in his article “A Case for the Electoral College.” He explains how in the 1800s, the amplified power of the minority balanced “the electoral gains that white supremacist Democrats reaped by disenfranchising black voters” (Douthat). He explains how this makes it possible for a less popular candidate to win the presidency as long as the “minority is regionally concentrated rather than diffuse[d]” (Douthat). While this viewpoint may seem appealing, it better serves to highlight other issues within our political system than support the continuation of the electoral college approach. There are other ways to account for voter disenfranchisement than relying on the presidential election system to account for the

Read More
594 Words | 3 Pages

When we have a 43 african americans in the house of representatives as shown in the what does the congress in america look like worksheet which is great compared to when there was severe racism in place still so our democratic community has come pretty far. Wikipedia tells us that in 1960-1970 only 10 african americans had been a representative, so compared to what we have now thats pretty good. I believe that democracy is a form of government that should be run without racism and that is what we have because in the what does congress look like page shows we don't just have african americans, hispanics, asian americans, and native americans, so that just proves

Read More
1275 Words | 6 Pages

Of all modern democracies, the United States, Great Britain, and France are among the most exemplary illustrations of liberal democracy. Although these three nations share the characteristics of liberal democracies, they differ greatly in multiple facets of their respective political cultures. Both the similarities and differences among these nations can be attributed to each country’s history, more specifically because of their revolutionary paths to liberation into modernity. The diversity of each country’s political practices, from political participation to governmental structure, while varying between them, still uphold the values of liberal democracy that allow these nations to succeed today. In this paper, I will be focusing on the divergence

Read More

More about Summary Of The Book 'Fantastic' By Lijphart

Related Topics

Open Document