“Boom”(lighting strikes) a storm begins.But do we really Understand what a storm is and what it’s capable of doing.” The perfect storm” and “ super disasters of the 21st century” both have the same topic but different techniques. Junger and Adam both explain the cause-and-effect of natural disasters although the way of explaining is different they’re still talking about the same goal. Sleet,clouds,waves,wind,temperature they all have part in the perfect storm. In the informational excerpt “The perfect storm” by Sebastian Junger. He had a purpose which was to describe the causative factors of increasing wave heightS. But like every other off you’re having a way of writing so did he,Junger used an anecdote by Albert Johnston and wrote how he thought and Felt about his experience.In the excerpt “ The perfect storm” paragraph 6 it states “ There is some evidence that average wave heights are slowly rising and that freak waves of 80 or 90 are becoming more common” ( Junger 164 ) he wrote on increasing wave height and how he thought and how Albert felt about it and backed it …show more content…
They had a different way of writing everyone has a different perspective on something.They began with facts about some of the natural disasters that happened.In the science article “Super Disasters of the 21st century” paragraph 6 it states “ Total losses exceeded $150 billion there was a human toll” ( Adams 144) They put down facts, they don’t use we or I or any words you would use for first person.”At least 1800 people died.Hundreds of missing people were never accounted for.”( Adams ) Not only but Rey also had a strategy to use things like metaphor , connotation and more to help the reader.In the article It states “ That means more monster storms loom ahead.” loom is a negative