ipl-logo

Summary Of To Save The World Don T Get A Job At A Charity

844 Words4 Pages

Ian Keller 2/26/23 PHL 313 Professor Bauer I. Introduction I'll be discussing William MacAskill's 2013 essay, "To Save the World, Don't Get a Job at a Charity; Go Work on Wall Street." Instead of working for charities directly, MacAskill argues that people who want to have the biggest impact on the world should pursue lucrative positions in finance and donate a sizeable amount of their wealth to worthwhile causes. I will set out MacAskill's position, emphasizing his main thoughts and points. I'll then provide my own philosophical response to this argument, outlining a different viewpoint on how people can affect change in the world. In particular, I'll argue that while earning to donate can be an effective way to donate money to effective charities, there are limitations to this approach. Instead, I will offer a more comprehensive strategy that takes into account the necessity of working directly for a charity and solving systemic challenges, as well as the relevance of pursuing meaningful employment. II. Exposure According to MacAskill, working directly for a charity is not the best method to change the world; instead, earning to donate is. He offers three primary arguments to back up this claim. First, there is a huge wage gap between employment in finance and those in charitable …show more content…

In other words, if someone else had taken the job instead, applying for a job at a charity might not necessarily have had a big difference. MacAskill explains this idea further saying “The competition for not-for-profit jobs is fierce, and if someone else takes the job instead of you, he or she likely won’t be much worse at it than you would have been.” (MacAskill, 2013) However, people can have a greater impact by giving more to successful organizations when they earn to give than they could have if they had accepted a lower-paying position with a

Show More
Related
1490 Words | 6 Pages

“Rockefeller so enjoyed business that he dreamed about it at night.” He was so focused on work that within a decade he commanded most of the oil in the United States and he did this through perseverance and passion. However, he didn’t do what he did to make money, he was very philanthropic and gave much of his earnings to charitable organizations. “He believed in The Law of Tenfold Return, i.e. if he gave happily, joyfully and confidently then for every dime he gave away he would receive a dollar, happy, joyfully and confidently, in return from providence.” He started a habit of giving as a young boy in the Baptist Church with his mother.

Read More
1471 Words | 6 Pages

Please help the children of this third world country by donating just one dollar a day. You can’t turn on the television without seeing a commercial asking you to donate to help feed the impoverished or to supply much needed medicine. In the article, “What Should a Billionaire Give – and What Should You?” the author attempts to make a point of giving money to charitable organizations, much like these commercials. Peter Singer’s article dives into the realm of philanthropy in order to aid the impoverished by appealing to logic through reasoning and statistics, and emotion by using examples throughout the writing.

Read More
505 Words | 3 Pages

At the end of the 19th Century, as the United States was experiencing rapid industrialization, a reconfiguration of the social order yielded opposing visions of social progress. Andrew Carnegie, wealthy businessman, and Jane Addams, founder of Chicago’s Hull House, put forward different methods to achieve such progress, where Addams focuses on creating social capital in a seemingly horizontal manner while Carnegie advocates for a top-down approach. While both of them seem to reap a sense of purpose from their attempts to improve the nation, their approaches vary depending on their vision of the composition of the population they want to uplift. First, Carnegie and Addams’ desire to improve society is partly self-serving. For Carnegie, improving society is the role of the wealthy man who, “animated by Christ’s spirit” (“Wealth”), can administer wealth for the community better than it could have for itself (“Wealth”).

Read More
467 Words | 2 Pages

Gunnar Olson 7/12/17 Lincoln’s second inaugural address Abraham Lincoln’s second inaugural address was anchored in the president’s awareness of the Union citizens’ growing anxiety about the grave causes and effects of the then Civil war conflict. In order to compel Union citizens to stay motivated towards this restoration of the Union by excusing Confederate insurgents and seeing through the necessary war, Lincoln transitions between inclusive pronouns to binary diction to capture conflicting and shared beliefs among Americans, as well as allusions to God’s religion to portray the war as repayment for the act of slavery. In his Second Inaugural Address, Abraham Lincoln surprised his audience by not giving a speech regarding politics, but instead using harsh and then encouraging diction and biblical allusions to inspire Americans and show them that they need to continue to work for peace.

Read More
939 Words | 4 Pages

Likewise, many wealthy people, including big business leaders, came to realize that it was their role in society was to give back. Due to all the negative responses, people such as Andrew Carnegie were huge philanthropists . They stated that because they were wealthy and were better inclined than most, they should be willing to help those at the bottom. Andrew Carnegie’s, Gospel of Wealth, explicitly stated how the wealthy have a moral obligation to give back (Outside Evidence). Other major responses to changes and the impact of big business were responses from the government.

Read More
806 Words | 4 Pages

ANDREW CARNEGIE: FROM RAGS TO RICHES TO CHARITY A LOOK INTO HOW ANDREW CARNEGIE IS CONSIDERED A HUMANITARIAN What is a humanitarian? According to the Oxford Dictionary, a humanitarian is someone who “seeks to promote human welfare; a philanthropist.” Andrew Carnegie fits the definition of a humanitarian without any shadow of a doubt.

Read More
1049 Words | 5 Pages

Instead of wasting money on unnecessary objects or luxurious items, the rich should use it for public good. Carnegie was a “Scottish immigrant” (Roark 524) who worked hard to become an influential figure in the Industrial era where competition meant everything. Since Carnegie knew the value of hardship and money, he could relate to those who were victims of big private corporations. According to Carnegie, “whether the change be for good or ill, it is upon us, beyond our power to alter, and therefore, to be accepted and made the best of it” (Carnegie 53). Again, Carnegie here advices other wealthy individuals to wisely spend their money on public, even though many imperialist at the time did not agree with Carnegie.

Read More
1292 Words | 6 Pages

Money: the root of most social problems and one of the few matters that almost everyone has an opinion on. Peter Singer’s “The Singer Solution to World Poverty,” a newspaper article, is no exception. Singer argues that one should donate all unnecessary money to the less fortunate because of the morality of the situation. However, though the goal is noble, his commentary is very ineffective due to its condescending tone, lack of hard facts, and overall extremism. The piece is written by Peter Singer, an Australian professor of bioethics at Princeton University.

Read More
3128 Words | 13 Pages

There can be no doubt that people should be morally free to live their own lives and pursue and develop their own interests, to a certain degree at the very least. This necessitates then that a person is morally permitted to dedicate one’s time, energy, and money to activities that don’t directly have an impact on famine relief or similar worthy causes. For example, it could frequently happen and has happened whereby certain pursuits and recreations have beneficial and favourable outcomes and consequences that could not have been foreseen. My argument lies with the issue that if people are not free to follow their intellectual interests when it is not obvious what positive impact they might have, or whether they would have any positive repercussions at all, humanity in general could be worse off than we actually are. This is tied to Singer’s argument if people are obligated to do as much as they possibly can, to aid famine relief, they would have to give up many of their own special projects and interests in order to do so.

Read More
504 Words | 3 Pages

Throughout history, wealth was kept within the family, totally opposite of what we see and expect from most successful business people of today. To bolster the notion that these industrial pioneers were not solely in it for themselves, men like Rockefeller gave millions in charitable donations. Carnegie even wrote a book about how to effectively spread money to the commonwealth as well as teaching the lower classes how to provide for themselves. In fact, Carnegie’s book was given to Bill Gates, a man known for his charitable contributions. As if these Statesmen’s giving nature were not enough, their impact on the world war was extraordinary; without them, America would have been left in the dust.

Read More
1509 Words | 7 Pages

The issue surrounding the wealthy class and their abundance of money is one that has been prominent for a long time. For many, the seemingly endless fortune these elite class people sit on has been deemed to be unfair and unnecessary, especially when there are people around the world who are not making enough money to obtain basic necessities. Peter Singer, a professor of bioethics, believes that the solution to this monetary problem is for the wealthy to simply donate money they don’t use on basic necessities back to the people in need. Although giving back to the less fortunate could potentially help in fixing many problems, prosperous people should not be obligated to donate money they “don’t need” to various organizations because since

Read More
576 Words | 3 Pages

Especially when in this era, corruption was no stranger to wealthy business owners. His various donations helped education institutes and libraries, these donations went to businesses but helped people interested in the scientific field or even people who were greatly into reading books. In today’s time, many celebrities donate to charities. For example, a cancer research lab may get many donations to help for further investigation to find a cure for cancer or help pay for patients who cannot afford therapy. In conclusion, this all goes to show that men administering their fortune does impact society and themselves as a

Read More
454 Words | 2 Pages

Andrew Carnegie could have let his employees keep their wages and worry about donations later. Taking money away to invest it somewhere else is not helping, because the people

Read More
409 Words | 2 Pages

The Ted-Talk, “What It Means to be a Citizen of the World” given by Hugh Evans was seemingly directed towards those individuals who “self identify first” as a “member of a state, nation, or tribe” and therefore are focused solely on the improvement of their closed-community rather than the improvement of the entire “human race”. Therefore, centering his audience at those individuals who remain outside the lines of being a global citizen. The main idea that Hugh draws up throughout his speech is the impact that the actions of a single individual; no matter how small, can have when one acts with the purpose of combating “extreme poverty, climate change, and inequality” on a global scale rather than a local one. In order to do so, Hugh introduces the stories of a few individuals who have been able to impact people that are “not [themselves], not in [their] neighborhood, [their] state, or even in [their] country” and along the way reveals his own journey to becoming a global citizen.

Read More
1340 Words | 6 Pages

In recent years, the topic of saving the Earth from Humans has shown itself in many conversations amongst the people of the public. Saving the World will be an issue we must solve in the near future because we are causing a mass extinction for animals, and we are harming and killing humans, but we can resolve it by using technology to reduce global warming and setting aside reserves. The most important thing humans must do in regards to this topic is begin to educate themselves and others on how drastic we must be in regards to it. The first major issue that must be made clear is the great peril animals are in, and what this means for the planet and humans.

Read More

More about Summary Of To Save The World Don T Get A Job At A Charity

Related Topics

Open Document