Andrew Carnegie makes it clear that people in society with wealth should help those who deserve the financial help. If those in need of help put in their effort, then why shouldn’t they be helped by those who don’t need it? In the Life of the Average Coal Miner, the harsh conditions that children faced is revealed. Children would work for hours in a crucial and dangerous environment and be rewarded with very little money that did not equal to the amount of work they put in. It is unfair to those who worked in the conditions in the Life of the Average Coal Miner. It is almost a betrayal to permit such inequality in our country and this is what Carnegie was standing for. The Life of the Average Coal Miner carries a huge emotional tone. It provides specific information to reveal the harsh conditions of the less fortunate. In other words, it provides an insight on how upset …show more content…
His good actions, like donations to schools, were often looked up at. So, with his views on making this society like how it used to be, had a toll on wealthy men. Of course, there were men who must have disagreed and disliked the idea of spending their wealth to the needy. However, it was those who took his perspective into consideration and actually followed his opinion that made a difference. This helped the U.S. drastically. Especially when in this era, corruption was no stranger to wealthy business owners. His various donations helped education institutes and libraries, these donations went to businesses but helped people interested in the scientific field or even people who were greatly into reading books. In today’s time, many celebrities donate to charities. For example, a cancer research lab may get many donations to help for further investigation to find a cure for cancer or help pay for patients who cannot afford therapy. In conclusion, this all goes to show that men administering their fortune does impact society and themselves as a