In Grant Penrod's "Anti-Intellectualism: Why We Hate the Smart Kids", he talks about how smart people are always degraded and hidden in the shadows of the popular people. He goes on to explain how intellectuals are stereotyped, beginning at a young age in school. He mentions how some public examples do not have to be smart to become rich and successful. Of course, if celebrities are well-off, they will have plenty of money to sustain in life and will believe that they do not need an education to be successful. He claims that people need to "lay off" of the smart kids. However, this essay is ineffective because the examples he uses are something that could be seen in a movie and not really realistic, the sources used throughout are not reliable to make an educated claim about anti-intellectualism, and he makes …show more content…
One of the sources he uses is by Dan6erous which says, “A+ this and… That’s all these people care about don’t they have lives damn nerds” (760). After he mentions this quote, he goes on to explain that intellectuals cannot have “normal social lives” because they are concerned about their school work and keeping up with their grades, therefore, they are anti-social and hated. Another source he uses is by ArCaNe which says, “Man how I hate nerds…if I ever had a tommygun with me… I would most probably blow each one of their…heads off” (759). These sources are not valid because they are just blog posts that these ignorant individuals posted, letting out their jealousy and anger on a computer screen. Another reason they are not reliable is because of their use of inappropriate language as well as the blog website, TalkingCock.com. Websites like these cannot be taken as one hundred percent true because they are just people’s opinions. These posts do not represent what society thinks of intellectuals as a