To start off, in the first paragraph, Susan B Anthony introduces her topic. She speaks on the woman right to vote and explains she has been charged for the crime of voting. To support that voting as a woman should not be a crime, she uses the national constitution as evidence. “It shall be my work this evening to prove to you that in thus voting, I not only
In the beginning Susan B Anthony Dares to Vote, the story shows that she was brave, even though it was against the law, she still went and voted because she is a citizen of America and she thought she should have the right to vote. For example, “On November 1872, she and 15 other women in Rochester, New York, had demanded to be registered and had voted in the national election. Soon after, all 16 women were arrested”. In the middle of the story when she was in court, instead of saying nothing or saying sorry, she stood up for herself and told the male judge that she would never pay if they gave her a fine.
The speeches of Susan B. Anthony and Franklin D. Roosevelt on women's right to vote were both powerful and influential in their own ways. While both speeches aimed to promote gender equality and secure women's right to vote, they differed in terms of rhetorical strategies and strength of arguments. In this essay, I argue that Susan B. Anthony's speech was stronger than that of Franklin D. Roosevelt, owing to its passionate rhetoric and logical arguments. Anthony's speech delivered in 1873 was a forceful and emotional appeal to the audience to recognize women's rights as equal citizens of the United States. She used powerful imagery to draw parallels between women's suffrage and the fight against slavery, arguing that denying women the right to vote was just as oppressive as slavery.
Second, the constitution also guarantees women’s right. Taking away the right to vote was taking away a part of the freedom for which the nation once fought and the constitution was signed. She states that the right to vote was guaranteed to her and “all United
Noor Syed Bushnell, Horace: Women’s Suffrage, 1869. New York: Scribner Horace Bushnell was a priest from Hartford Connecticut. In 1869, he published “Women’s Suffrage”, a book in which he offered his view on women being allowed to vote. He embedded rhetoric based on cultural norms, religion, science, and history into his argument. Bushnell’s stance was clear: women should not be allowed to vote.
One of the ways Susan B. Anthony establishes her ethos is by citing her personal experience and involvement in the suffrage movement. She describes herself as a lifelong advocate for women's rights and highlights her active participation in the movement through actions such as attending political conventions and distributing suffrage literature. By emphasizing her personal commitment to the cause, Susan B Anthony establishes herself as a credible and trustworthy source of information on the issue of women's suffrage. Also, Susan B Anthony uses historical references to lend further credibility to her argument. She cites the Declaration of Independence and the Constitution as evidence of the fundamental principles of democracy and equal representation and emphasizes the fact
Elizabeth Cady Stanton’s “Address on Women’s Rights” was an influential piece of rhetoric that was an important part of the fight for women’s rights and still remains relevant to the political and religious bodies of the 21st century. This poignant expression about women’s rights was just the beginning of a long fight for women’s rights that continues to this day, but Elizabeth Cady Stanton also endorsed an idea of reinterpreting scripture to extinguish the oppression of women and other minority groups. This speech was written before the Seneca Falls Convention, which took place in 1848. This convention was held when women were beginning to fight for the right to vote in America.
During the period between 1865 and 1920, the status of women in the United States experienced remarkable changes, setting the stage for the modern-day American woman. In my essay, I focus on the transformative impact of the suffrage battle and the crucial roles of education and industrialization in shaping women's lives. Throughout this era, women's lives underwent an unprecedented transition, evident in their united efforts in the suffrage campaign, increased participation in the labor force, and improved access to education. The suffrage campaign, spearheaded by influential figures like Susan B. Anthony and Elizabeth Cady Stanton, served as a primary driver for change, advocating for women's right to vote.
Therein, she expressed her ideas about women 's suffrage. She gave a talk to encourage American men and women to give political rights to women. In her speech, she states that both men and women are created equal and hence due to this equality women should have political rights too. Throughout her speech she emphasizes the discrimination against women, using the right to vote, the roles in marriage, and unequal wages as her evidence.
Women's Voting Rights A woman voter, Susan B. Anthony, in her speech, Woman’s Right to Vote (1873), says that women should be allowed to vote. She supports this claim first by explaining that the preamble of the Federal Constitution states that she did not commit a crime, then she goes on about how women should be able to vote, then about how everyone hates the africans, and finally that the people of the United States should let women and africans vote. Anthony’s purpose is to make women able to vote in order to give women the right to vote on decisions made by the people. She creates a serious tone for the people of the United States.
In her speech she continues to say, “And it is a downright mockery to talk to women of their enjoyment of the blessings of liberty while they are denied the use of the only means of securing them provided by this democratic-republic government -- the ballot.” (Anthony,1)
Susan B. Anthony, a woman who was arrested for illegally voting in the president election of 1872, in her “On Women's Right to Vote” speech, argues that women deserve to be treated as citizens of America and be able to vote and have all the rights that white males in America have. She begins by introducing her purpose, then provides evidence of how women are citizens of America, not just males by using the preamble of the Constitution, then goes on about the how this problem has became a big problem and occurs in every home in the nation, and finally states that women deserve rights because the discrimination against them is not valid because the laws and constitutions give rights to every CITIZEN in America. Anthony purpose is to make the woman of America realize that the treatment and limitations that hold them back are not correct because they are citizens and they deserve to be treated like one. She adopts a expressive and confident tone to encourage and light the hearts of American woman. To make her speech effective, she incorporates ethos in her speech to support her claims and reasons.
Equality has been a problem in many nations for centuries. Since the start of time, it has been believed that men are far more superior to women and that the rights of women should be limited. In many countries today, it is the social norm for women to have limited rights including the right to voice their opinions. All around the world women have had no say in who runs their country, or in decisions that affect them. The United States had this same problem until women stood up and fought for their right to vote.
Thesis Proposal Title The impact women’s right to vote had on economic growth in the U.S, as women in integrated into the labour force from the 1920’s to the 1990’s. Background Prior to the 1920s, before women got their right to vote in America. They took up in the more subservient role in society, they were not seen as equal to the men.
Argumentative essay (Gettysburg address) The Gettysburg Address is one of the most well-known speeches in American history. Delivered by President Abraham Lincoln on November 19, 1863, it was given during the midst of the Civil War and served as a pivotal moment in defining the purpose of the war and the future of the nation. This short but powerful speech is often lauded for its eloquence and its ability to capture the spirit of the time. However, the speech is not without controversy.
