ipl-logo

Supreme Court Case: Muller V. Oregon

592 Words3 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Essays on women's rights over the years

The link above is a primary source over “The "Brandeis Brief" from Muller v. Oregon (1908).” Muller vs Oregon was one of the most important U.S. Supreme Court cases of the Progressive Era. Going into this case, Muller issue was, “is a state law setting a maximum workday for women constitutional?” Muller vs The State of Oregon, 208 U.S. 412 (1908) was argued on January 5, 1908 and ending on February 24, 1908. Curt Muller was a laundry mat owner in Portland, Oregon who was charged with violating an Oregon law that strictly set a restricted maximum of ten hours a day for a women employee to work. This was specifically any women working in a type of laundry facility or any type of factory. This law was passed back in Oregon in 1903. Muller made …show more content…

This then led to Muller suggesting that maybe the state of Oregon is over stepping their own boundaries because according to the 14th amendment they have no say in the matter. The State of Oregon states that the state law could interfere with the amendments “liberty to contract” because the interference can be a causation to protect the safety of the female workers. The Supreme Court defined women as a class needing protection based on their role in society. The Supreme Court also points out the weakness of a woman and how they rely on men for support. After a long debate the Supreme Court unanimously 9-0 decided that Muller was guilty. Because of this case, this lead to better work protection under state law for not only women but children as well. It also fought culture stereotypes of the weaker sex. Muller vs The State of Oregon was related to the labor movement in which women can now feel safer and more protected under the state laws and regulation. With women now planning a more noticeable and important role in factories and laundry mats it was important that their safety and protection is a key point in the working

Show More
Related
767 Words | 4 Pages

In Brandenburg v. Ohio, in 1969, problems arose when Brandenburg, a leader of a Klu Klux Klan, held a KKK meeting in an Ohio farm. In the convention Brandenburg was filmed as he complained about the United States suppressing the white race. For the most part the film was inaudible but it was certain that Brandenburg had stated some demeaning opinions on African Americans and Jews. In the assembly some Klu Klux Klan members were holding weapons. Though Brandenburg was not, he made it clear that violence would not take place unless it was necessary.

Read More
536 Words | 3 Pages

According to the Tenth Amendment of the constitution, “The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people”. There have been moments in history where Congress has implemented laws that states felt were unconstitutional. The Constitution gave states the ability to counter the federal government’s power through the Judiciary branch of government, when they feel a law is unconstitutional. The Founders of our nation gave Congress enumerated powers to pass legislation that needs to be abided by all states and citizens. At times Congress will overstep its powers by enacting laws that are unconstitutional and the states have the right to challenge those powers.

Read More
72 Words | 1 Pages

: In the year of 1979 in the state of Mississippi, Joe Hogan was denied admission into a single-sex education establishment called the Mississippi University for Women due to his gender. Hogan claims that MUW’s women-only policy violates the Fourteenth Amendment which holds the equal protection clause. MUW states that their policy has shown to have logical reasoning for its existence and claims to have no violation of his equal protection rights.

Read More
574 Words | 3 Pages

There were many court cases that were discussed in class regarding the mob versus the individual. The most important ones were the United States v. Schwimmer, Roe v. Wade, Boy Scouts of America v. Dale, and Brown v. Board of Education. In all but one of the cases above, the Mob (the government) used its power to stop the individual from pursuing their American dream. The individual was right in all of the cases because they had the right to express themselves and pursue their dream; and the government had to right to stop them from following it. Starting with the Schwimmer case, the individual was right because the government was not giving her a valid reason as to why they were denying her citizenship.

Read More
470 Words | 2 Pages

Susan B. Anthony Susan B. Anthony was a suffragist who fought for the right to vote for women. Anthony had several reasons for why a woman should not be deny the right to vote. Some of them being that women are also humans and as humans the constitution secures their rights and those rights could not be taken away. First, when they denied women’s right to vote it implied that they were not humans like every other man.

Read More
425 Words | 2 Pages

Citation. 555 US _ (2008) DOCKET NO. United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit . BRIEF FACT OF SAMMARY : Michael Pulido was convicted of first-degree murder in a California state court for his involvement in the shooting of a gas station attendant during the course of a robbery.

Read More
701 Words | 3 Pages

United States v. Virginia: Equal Protection Nathan O’Hara Liberty High School 4A   United States v. Virginia is an equal rights case that argued whether it was constitutional for Virginia Military Institute (VMI) to deny women the opportunity to attend the all male Institute purely because of their genders (U.S. v. Virginia, 1996). Virginia was accused of violating the 14th Amendment’s Equal Protection Clause and trying to make an all female institution as a substitute for not accepting women (U.S. v. Virginia, 1996). In response Virginia created the Virginia Women’s Institute for Leadership (VWIL) as a female alternative located at the already all female Mary Baldwin College (Chicago-Kent College of Law, 2015b).

Read More
1445 Words | 6 Pages

Edwards v. Aguillard Edwards v. Aguillard is a supreme court case that challenges the legality of the Creationism Law. The creationism law said that you didn’t have to teach evolution,but if you did you also had to teach creationism. The law was ruled unconstitutional in a federal court and then an appeals court. It was then moved to the supreme court, the supreme court ruled in a 7-2 decision that the law broke the establishment clause and therefore was unconstitutional.(Gordon) The law was first challenged by a parent of student who objected the legality of the Creation Law.

Read More
800 Words | 4 Pages

Muller v. Oregon, 208 U.S. 412 (1908), is listed is a landmark decision made in the United States Supreme Court history. This law justifies both sex discrimination and labor laws that were made during that time period. Without theses laws we probably wouldnt have gotten to the point we are at today with labor laws. This ruling set the foundation for the laws we have today on how many hours we can work a day as well as how many hours we can work without break. The case upheld an Oregon law that bared women from working more than 10 hours a day in industrialized jobs.

Read More
689 Words | 3 Pages

In the article, "The (Not-So-Secret) War on Moms: How the Supreme Court Took Protections Away from Pregnant Workers" by Ariela Migdal, Ariela talks about the Supreme Court's decision 5-4 that an arrangement in the FMLA (Family and Medical Leave Act) giving specialists time off to watch over their own particular genuine wellbeing conditions, including pregnancy and labor, can't be implemented by state representatives in harms claims against their open managers. In Coleman v. Court of Appeals of Maryland unprotected open representatives of the privilege to occupation insurance when they have to require significant investment off while pregnant. Most of the Court concurred that the law was not advocated as a solution for an example of unlawful oppression ladies or pregnant specialists. Equity Ruth Ginsburg's contradiction was that the FMLA was drafted as sexually unbiased reaction to the way that past authoritative triumphs, including the Pregnancy Discrimination Act of 1978, which corrected the social equality laws to restrict work victimization pregnant laborers. Like before, pregnant specialists are as of now being pushed out of the work environment, pregnant laborers ought to remain at home, and ladies who take maternity leave pay an overwhelming cost for

Read More
749 Words | 3 Pages

In 1803, the Marbury v. Madison case was brought before the Supreme Court. The plaintiff was Federalist William Marbury and, through the principle of judicial review, he wanted the Court to issue a writ of mandamus so that he can receive official documents from the Secretary of State. Marbury claimed that it was unconstitutional for Madison to withhold the commission, but James Madison was under orders from the president, who could ignore court decisions. This case helped solidate the Supreme Court’s position and power as a branch of government equal to the Legislative and Executive branches.

Read More
478 Words | 2 Pages

Hana Kim Professor Yvonne Wollenberg Law and Politics 106 7 October 2015 Title In the United States government, there are three branches called the legislative, executive, and judicial branch. Out of these three, the judicial branch is the most powerful. The judicial branch is made up of the Supreme Court, the court with the most power in the country, and other federal courts that are lower in the system; the purpose of this branch is to look over laws and make sure they are constitutional and reasonable.

Read More
128 Words | 1 Pages

With the help of the League of Women, labor movement law for women, women was able to get influenced in the public sphere. They challenged the Supreme Court, as a result women were able to get shorter hours in the workplace. According to Lipschultz, even if women had a suffrage movement and the passing of women’s right, government did not agree that women should still have an equal wage as men, even if they, the women had rights to vote. (Lipschultz, 142-153)

Read More
716 Words | 3 Pages

"The State of California versus Scott Lee Peterson (Case number 1056770, 2005)", was an interesting case. This case was interesting because Laci was a very beautiful and seemingly young, friendly, and happily pregnant woman with lots of friends. Her husband, although attractive, had a kind of macho tough guy womanizer type of persona about himself. It is hard to believe or fathom someone being so cruel as to kill their pregnant wife, regardless of their marital problems. Laci came up missing on December 24, of 2002, the day before Christmas.

Read More
2197 Words | 9 Pages

"Katherine Mckinnon and Feminist Legal Theory, Emancipation or Oppression?” The female question, or the feminist enterprise can be traced back to Mary Wollstonecraft and her suffragettes in the early 1900s. The movement has led to considerable leaps that have been made in the domain of policy, through the placement of a considerable influence on issues such as rape, harassment, prostitution, the Equal Rights Amendments etcetera. Regardless of such unprecedented and significant gains driven by the Feminist initiative, Feminist ideology seems to have discovered a new point of contention.

Read More

More about Supreme Court Case: Muller V. Oregon

Related Topics

Open Document