The Supreme Court’s decision amalgamated with the Reconstruction-era differentiation between civil rights and social rights in the preceding court case of Plessy v. Ferguson in 1896. Conforming to Justice Henry Brown, the Fourteenth Amendment endorsed “absolute equality of the two races before the law, but, in the nature of things, it could not have been intended to abolish distinctions based upon color, or to enforce social, as distinguished from political equality.” Congress could require the separation of the races as Brown communicated the reasoning of the laws not implying the inferiority towards either race. Plessy’s lawyer, Albion Tourgee, exhorted that the segregation regulations implied the white supremacy’s view of African American was seen as inferior. …show more content…
In spite of the fact that Plessy v. Ferguson was not incorporated with the segregation in public school system, it was understood that the Supreme Court had approved the legislation of Jim Crow system that involved segregated schools. In the case, Justice Brown utilize the segregation of school to emphasize his argument and demonstration of the system not correlating to the suggestion of abasement. Plessy v. Ferguson deduced to the “separate but equal doctrine,” where segregated facilities were substantiated by the Constitution and in equal conditions. The following of five justices designated to erode the Jim Crow system and using the courts to ignite their