ipl-logo

Supreme Court's Agenda By Vanessa A. Baird: Article Analysis

998 Words4 Pages

For my second reflection paper for this class, I chose to read and study the article titled “The Effect of Politically Salient Decisions on the U.S. Supreme Court’s Agenda” written by Vanessa A. Baird. Baird writes a well-organized and fact-supported article with the intention of studying what influences the U.S. Supreme Court to hear certain cases while denying others. This was the topic that was chosen to be studied because whatever factor influences the cases the court receives and hears, it also affects the policies being placed on Americans. The author found tons of research regarding this issue and incorporated it into her study. In the end, the author was able to conclude that salient decisions, made by the Supreme Court in certain policy …show more content…

Baird questions if interest groups have the power to influence litigation patterns, and believes that if they do, the conditions of the situation will determine if they decide to further engage in litigation. I felt that this was something important to note considering the author establishes that litigation essentially creates the agenda of the Supreme Court, in an indirect manner of sort. In other words, litigation and what seems to be viewed as “policy priorities” have a way of creating an agenda based on each other. The author approaches this by implying that litigation seeks the information provided by policy priorities. On the other hand, it seems as if policy priorities are based on the cases brought before the court, which are a result of litigation. In a way, it seems as if there isn’t a way to divide the two from each other. The article provided readers with a lot of information that might not have been well known. Personally, I wasn’t aware of the protentional reasons that cases would and wouldn’t be heard by the Supreme Court. I thought that cases were mostly chosen at random or in the order that was brought before the …show more content…

Although this article is very informative, it still leaves me with a few questions and ideas on what I believe should stem from this study. My first question would be, why does this matter? What is being influenced by the Supreme Court’s agenda other than policy? This is a question that I don’t feel like this article answered and as I mentioned before, I have limited prior knowledge on this topic and will need to research further. Another question I have is directed towards the author, rather than the information. My question for the author would be, what made you interested in this topic? For our assignment, we are supposed to be determining why this topic is being studied, but I am unclear on the cause. This might be due to my lack of prior knowledge as well, but I didn’t really see anything to answer this question of mine either. One study that I believe has the potential to stem from this study is a study to determine whether the same factors that influence the cases the court hears directly affect the policies being

Show More
Related
1023 Words | 5 Pages

When people think of how government works, unless they’ve taken a government class, they usually think of Congress making laws and the President doing pretty much everything else. No one pays much attention to the Supreme Court unless there is a landmark case or something else to grab the news — like the recent death of Justice Antonin Scalia. But the Supreme Court does much more than you’d think regarding keeping the political machine running like a well-oiled … machine. Through not only interpretation of the law, but also judicial activism, the Supreme Court shows it can have as much influence over the laws of the land as either of the other branches of the federal government. In this paper, I will analyze the decision-making methods of the Court using the cases of Gideon v. Wainwright and Betts v. Brady.

Read More
1314 Words | 6 Pages

In regards to the detailed studies of both Segal and Spaeth, and Brenan and Stier, valid points had been made for both sides of the argument. The question posed is rather or not stare decisis still exist in the courts rulings today. Segal and Spaeth analyze the rulings of dissenting judges of landmark cases since the start of the Warren Court while excluding cases with unanimous decisions and cases without progeny within the legal period. The areas of which they dissected and constructed the particular datasets for analyzing is superb as it specifically narrows down the specific information there looking for within their results. The findings from there assessments concluded that precedent did not play a overwhelming role in the sub sequential

Read More
819 Words | 4 Pages

The structure of the book has placed it at the top of the reading list for aspiring law students. It effectively maps out the Supreme Court’s ruling history and also the crucial turning point of progressing American civil liberties. Robert F. Kennedy commented on Gideon’s perseverance stating, “If an obscure Florida convict named Clarence Earl Gideon had not sat down in prison with a pencil and paper to write a letter to the Supreme Court; and if the Supreme Court had not taken the trouble to look at the merits in that one crude petition among all the bundles of mail it must receive every day, the vast machinery of

Read More
933 Words | 4 Pages

Both of these cases go to show that judicial interpretation allows some flexibility into the constitution. It allows things that are not expressly stated in the constitution to be made

Read More
977 Words | 4 Pages

This particular case has brought into question the constitutionality

Read More
767 Words | 4 Pages

Judicial Review gave power to the Supreme Court, as well as the Judicial Branch as a whole in comparison to the other branches that, at the time, were far more powerful. These new powers included the ability to determine if a legislative act is constitutional. Not only did this case have long term effects, but there were also a significant immediate effect that took place: the social impact and response to the case, recognition of the power of the Supreme Court. Due to these statements, I agree with many historical and legal students when they say the case of Marbury vs, Madison was, “epochal.” This will be the basis of this essay.

Read More
2663 Words | 11 Pages

Justice Antonin Scalia made no apologies for his legal philosophy of “originalism,” despite opposition from other justices and the public. Scalia believed that the United States Constitution should strictly be interpreted in terms of what the founding fathers had meant for it when the Constitution was written. Scalia’s critics contended that the Constitution is a “living document,” therefore, it should allow the courts to take into consideration evolving viewpoints of society. I. Antonin Scalia: A brief overview of his law career beginning in 1961.

Read More
591 Words | 3 Pages

The words written across the front page were impossible to miss, so large and so bold, I could hear them screaming, shouting, almost shrieking into my ears. These words wanted to infiltrate my mind, resonate within me, and conquer my every thought. And it worked. The headline read: Clarence Thomas: The New Thurgood Marshall. I sat there, initially speechless, initially apathetic, incapable of comprehending.

Read More
260 Words | 2 Pages

Taking a significant step away from the Framers’ vision of the judiciary and stepping closer toward a politicized Supreme Court that acts as a super-legislature and super-regulator; Massachusetts v EPA, in a 5-4 decision the Supreme Court stepping closer toward a politicized Supreme Court that acts as a super-legislature and super-regulator (p. 176, Rosenbloom, 2015, Vicara, 2017). In this decision, the Court substituted its judgment for that of the politically accountable branches of the federal government. In doing so, the Court undermined the legal rules of standing. The majority also supported its decision with a one-sided and unsophisticated account of the scientific evidence for the petitioners’ claims concerning climate change, needlessly

Read More
2308 Words | 10 Pages

Mark Sutherland 's Judicial Tyranny is destined to be a classic, and unlike similar well-written books by Mark Levin and Pat Robertson, Sutherland 's book is unique: it is hard-hitting and much more multi-faceted on the issues it covers. Additionally, it represents a profound cooperative effort by a potentate of conservative luminaries from James

Read More
1112 Words | 5 Pages

Today, we still find significant concerns for how vast and powerful interest groups and their associated PACs have become over the past few decades, and their far reaching ability they have to affect even the highest court in the

Read More
1750 Words | 7 Pages

During his presidency, Ronald Reagan left an indelibly conservative mark on the judiciary, appointing three new Supreme Court justices. In an address to the National Association of Evangelicals, a staunchly pro-life agenda is explicitly made by Reagan. Polemics like “Abortion on demand now takes the lives of up to 1.5 million unborn children a year. Human life legislation ending this tragedy will some day pass the Congress, and you and I must never rest until it does,” (Story and Laurie, 127) are framed by the undeniably conservative tale: “There’s a great spiritual awakening in America, a renewal of the traditional values that have been the bedrock of America’s goodness and greatness” (Story and Laurie,

Read More
1184 Words | 5 Pages

Since the court’s docket is discretionary, there is a chance that the court refrains from hearing a case that it expects to garner hostile response in Congress. The estimation of probability with constitutionality of congressional statute will be reviewed by the court, its conditional expected utility gains from the median justice depends on the final rulings of the merits as far as they see the

Read More
2032 Words | 9 Pages

The fact that it was a majority Conservative Supreme Court decision makes it easier to believe that the overturn was an inherently political decision. The so-called impartiality of rights comes into question when you see it through the political lens brought forward by Ingram. The issue of abortion, especially in America, is inherently political, and when it was overturned, this revealed the inherent flaw in using rights as a basis for justice. Although their ability to change over time is, in some cases, a pro, it is also not a redeemable quality. Because rights can change and are always changing, there is also a possibility that people's liberties are in danger of being taken away, as is shown by Roe v. Wade’s overturning.

Read More
517 Words | 3 Pages

The Supreme Courts job is not to correct the errors of other courts but to resolve substantial legal issues. The courts own guidelines say there must be "compelling reasons" for accepting a case. When the supreme court accepts a case the majority of the justices disagree with the rulings made in the lower courts. The courts then make a decision indicating which party won the case.

Read More

More about Supreme Court's Agenda By Vanessa A. Baird: Article Analysis

Open Document