ipl-logo

What Can A Surgical Expert Medical Witness Do For You At Trial?

912 Words4 Pages

What Can a Surgical Expert Medical Witness Do for You at Trial? An expert witness can be retained by counsel as a consultant or be used to testify in court. These witnesses perform two important functions. The first is to use their tools, experience, and education to evaluate the evidence of a case, then form an educated opinion of that evidence as it relates to a court case. The other function of expert witnesses is to communicate that opinion to those present in the courtroom; primarily the judge and/or jury as well as attorneys.
Physicians play an important role in this system, as noted by the American College of Surgeons in their April 2011 Bulletin. They issued a statement saying, in part, that physicians have an obligation to testify in court as expert witnesses when appropriate. Surgeons are just …show more content…

The ideal surgical expert witness will have certain attributes above the rest. A list of guidelines below will help you in making that decision.
● The best expert witnesses can explain things to a variety of audiences. Not every surgeon is comfortable or willing to discuss complicated medical procedures outside of the operating room.
● Ideally, your surgical expert has, or had, hospital privileges where the incident in your case occurred. This helps you make a more accurate comparison about the treatment that took place there.
● The best surgical experts act as impartial educators, giving differing viewpoints as needed. Their testimony will not favor any party in the case, rather, it will be a truthful explanation of the circumstances surrounding the incident regardless of the surgeon's personal opinions.
● Ideally, your surgical expert demonstrates relevant continuing education specific to the circumstances of the case. All surgeons are required to complete continuing education but not necessarily in the specific area.
● The specialty of your expert should be appropriate to the subject matter of the

Show More
Related

Law 421 Week 1 Memo Sample

1383 Words | 6 Pages

He recommended Drs. Gleiberman, Halbridge, and Suzuki. I would not recommend the use of an Agreed Medical Examiner. It does not appear that we will be able to settle this case without going to an independent doctor. I would recommend a panel qualified medical examination after the next deposition.

Read More

Pros And Cons V. Defendant Medic East

826 Words | 4 Pages

11. Similarly the reasoning for the refusal to disclose Dr. Rigney’s radiological reviews is equally misleading. While Plaintiff appreciates that Defendant Medic East has advised the court that Dr. Rigney will not be called as a witness in the instant matter, an admission Plaintiff intends to enforce should Defendant Medic East suddenly change their mind later, it does not change the fact that said reports were supplied to Dr.

Read More

Cleveland V. Perry: A Case Study

1223 Words | 5 Pages

To show that a breach of professional duty occurred, there must be the concept of standard of care. Standard of care generally refers to that care which a reasonable, similar professional would have provided to the patient. Morissette writes “to establish breach of a standard of professional care, expert witness testimony becomes essential since a jury of laypersons cannot understand the distinctions of medical care.” (2014, p. 134) An emergency room doctor would be an exceptional witness to show that the inactions of Dr. Perry greatly reduced the chance of his patient surviving. In addition, the Learned Hand Formula should be applied in this case, by checking Michael’s vitals, Dr. Perry would have reduced the risk of harm and possibly death because he would have realized his misdiagnoses and would have given Michael a greater chance of

Read More

Catherine Coyne Case Summary

685 Words | 3 Pages

As you know, we previously have taken the testimony of the claimant and a lay witness for the employer. We do not have an IME in this case but we are taking the testimony of the attending surgeon, Dr. Noce. Dr. Noce testified today that he was familiar with the claimant. He said he first saw the claimant at St. Peter’s emergency room just prior

Read More

HIPAA Regulations: Limiting Or Disclosing PHI?

706 Words | 3 Pages

HIPAA regulations state that when using or disclosing PHI (protected health information) or when requesting PHI from another covered entity (a doctor’s office, dental practice, etc), a covered entity must make reasonable efforts to limit PHI, to the minimum necessary, to accomplish the intended purpose of the use, disclosure or request. So how do we accomplish the goal of limiting our PHI access and requests to the minimum necessary level? We look at three basic areas: levels of access to PHI, requesting PHI, and sending PHI. Giving employees specific levels of access to PHI

Read More

The Case Of Harris Vs Csx

1898 Words | 8 Pages

This entails Rule 702 in which a qualified expert can testify in the form of an opinion. What the trial court did was allow an evidentiary hearing to take place over a few days at the request of the CSX Transportation defense. During this hearing they heard the testimony of all the expert witnesses. Their mistake occurred when they ruled the plaintiff’s three scientific experts, Dr. Goldstein, Dr. Infante, and Dr. Durie, as excluded from the trial case on the basis of unreliable testimony. They concluded that the three experts did not use reliable methodologies to prove conclusively that Mr. Harris’s cancer, multiple myeloma, was caused by

Read More

First Surgical Assistant Research Paper

265 Words | 2 Pages

Surgical technologist is a professional that has direct influence in the processes that involved life-or-death situation. They actively participate in delivering care to patients undergoing invasive and non-invasive surgical intervention. They worked with their surgical conscience, following the principles of asepsis and stands as a patient advocate, abiding by the maxim "Aeger Primo" or patient first.

Read More

How Does Capote Use Dramatic Irony In The In Cold Blood

961 Words | 4 Pages

Mistakes like these are made more than people think. Not giving full information in the courtroom can lead people to fates that they don’t deserve. More than one doctor should have testified for both criminals. The more observations would leave less room for

Read More

Summary Of R V Lavallee 1989

1256 Words | 6 Pages

Case: R. v. Lavallee 1989: October 31; 1990: May 3 Relevant Facts The appellant, Angelique Lyn Lavallee, lived with her partner, Kevin Rust. The crime occurred in their house.

Read More

Code Of Ethics In Surgical Technologist

1026 Words | 5 Pages

Code Of Ethics Regardless of any personal beliefs, Surgical Technologist have several professional standards to maintain when it comes to personal conduct and high patient care to uphold at all times. The entire medical team is responsible for keeping patient information confidential at all times, unless instructed not to by the patient. As part of the care team we need to respect and protect any legal, moral rights the patient may have.

Read More

Tort Case Study: Health Care Law

1368 Words | 6 Pages

Health Care Law: Tort Case Study Carolann Stanek University of Mary   Health Care Law: Tort Case Study A sample case study reviewed substandard care that was delivered to Ms. Gardner after having sustained an accident and brought to Bay Hospital for treatment. Dr. Dick, a second-year pediatric resident, was on that day in the ED and provided care for Ms. Gadner. Dr. Moon, is the chief of staff and oversees the credentialing of all physicians at Bay Hospital.

Read More

The Pros And Cons Of Whiplash Claim

764 Words | 4 Pages

Whiplash Claims – A real pain in the neck? Last year, in a rather surprising turn of events, the UK Government and the large Insurance Companies, announced they had finally had enough of people making false whiplash claims. They believed it was time for the “compensation culture” to stop. The Ministry of Justice intended to raise the small claims limit to £5,000 (thereby doing away with Solicitors recovering their costs) and compensation for low value whiplash claims would be banned (the emphasis being placed on rehabilitation rather than reward).

Read More

Trial Judge Credibility

1859 Words | 8 Pages

When analyzing a witness testimony, the first thing to consider is; is this witness telling the truth or are they lying? One must be able to spot the small nuances and

Read More

Objectifying In Court

469 Words | 2 Pages

1.When testifying if in court there are many factors that cause people to do as good as they would like. This is due to the levels or stress, nervousness and anxiety rise. Another aspect many people have a difficulty while testifying is to remain calm and respectful to other parties. Its normal for a lawyer to raise your stress levels and put one in an uncomfortable position. This cause many people to become disrespectful.

Read More

Wrongful Adviction In The Criminal Justice System

1266 Words | 6 Pages

When reviewing the issues associated with the criminal justice system in the United States, wrongful convictions are becoming a serious one that society as a whole needs to be aware of. While there are a countless factors that can contribute to a wrongful conviction, there are five distinct ones that are the leading causes in wrongful convictions: the adversarial process, Eyewitness identification, misconduct and errors regarding forensic evidence, interrogations and confessions, and jailhouse snitches/informants. In relation to wrongful convictions, the adversarial system places more emphasis on the process rather than truth finding, meaning an individual can usually only appeal if there is an issue regarding the process; if someone is wrongfully

Read More

More about What Can A Surgical Expert Medical Witness Do For You At Trial?

Related Topics

Open Document