In this excerpt from a speech delivered in 1873 by Susan B. Anthony, the
author directly refutes the inequal oligarchy of sex by stating the contradictions of these
concepts against the constitutions of United States. By heavily emphasizing the
attributes of the democracy, the author reinforces the concept of revolution, which
functioned to provoke woman suffarage movement. In order to effectively state her
position, the author incorporated various persuasive techniques including, reiteration of
the constitutional rights, creating rapport with the readers, and inducement of voluntary
thoughts regards to this matter.
The author is mindfully persuasive from the very beginning, opening her
speech with very clear arguement. She claims
…show more content…
Lastly, the author induced voluntary thoughts from the readers regards to this
matter. In the last paragraph, the author questions the readers that may sound obvious
and even stupid to some degrees: “Are women persons?”. Obviously women are
human, and it may seem as if there is no need to answer this questions. But, all the
disfranchisement and inequality that prevailed at that time, limited the human rights of
woman. Thus, this rhetorical question was intentionally manipulated by the author to
emphasize the apparent ironic situation, thus stressing the need for the change.
Furthermore, by restating that discrimination against women contradicts the
constitution and laws of the state, while also mentioning similar situation of Negroes,
the author expanded her argument from the feminism perspective to the union of the
United States as a whole, appealing to the readers about her sincere intentions of
promoting United States to equal and just contries.
In conclusion, the author clevelry structure her speech in a way that could effectively
persuade specific audience, United States Citizens. By clearly displaying the
unfairness and contradictions that our society have, the author induced