Tell A True War Story 'And Elie Wiesel's Night'

1346 Words6 Pages

Pain is a necessary evil of war; remembrance of the pain is purely perception. Throughout Tim O’Brien’s “How to Tell a True War Story” and Elie Wiesel’s Night there are many references to intense events of tragedy and redemption with vivid and eye-opening detail. These sources of work take us through war via two completely different vantage points through two completely different wars. Wiesel’s Night take us on the tragic endeavor of a person of Jewish belief during the Holocaust. On the contrary, O’Brien’s “How to tell a True War Story” takes us on the thrilling journey of US soldier during the Vietnam War. The definition of “war” in both of the texts is contrasted in terms of context, but in terms of the authors’ remembrance, perceptively they are similar. As …show more content…

O’Brien states this with “You can tell a true war story if it embarrasses you. If you don’t care for obscenity, you don’t care for the truth; if you don’t care for the truth, watch how you vote. Send guys to war, they come home talking dirty” (O’Brien 66). Wiesel would agree with “This is the twentieth century, not the Middle Ages. Who would allow such crimes to be committed? How could the world remain silent” (Wiesel 118) and “To forget the dead would be akin to killing them a second time” (Wiesel xv). Wiesel is referring to the uncomfortable truths of “war” and the story of how a cultured people could turn to genocide, and how the rest of the world, which is also composed of cultured people, remained silent without action. Wiesel and O’Brien are in mutual agreement, war should be relayed through story telling without modification to culturally accepted norms or truncation of detail. To do so would not only be an injustice to the reality of the story, but an injustice to the people who lived the reality of “war”