Should tradition be altered once in awhile? It wouldn’t hurt just to make a couple of changes just to be “safe”. In the story, “The Lottery” by Shirley Jackson, there are a small town of people who celebrate a special tradition. It occurs annually in the morning of June 27th located at the town square. The people in the town seem friendly but there is a dark secret that they all do during the lottery. The winner of the lottery is very unfortunate which is quite ironic, and is chosen to be sacrificed for the great of crops. There are important characters within the story but, there were two character whom stuck out the story the most. These two characters were Mr. Summers and Tessie Huntchinson. In every town there is a leader, and in this town the leader happens to be a round-faced man judicial Mr. Summers. This poor man ran the coal in the town, and people felt bad for him because he has no children and a wife who is to abusive to him. This man values his town and the crops within it, so he would practically do whatever it takes to keep the tradition going. He dislikes nothing and just cares about his town. His overarching goal is to keep sacrificing for the crops. The motives he has is his tradition and he would never change. He plays his part and keeps the town running. …show more content…
She was ordinary just like everyone else in the town. She was a middle aged, jovial, sarcastic housewife. Tessie, who is married to Bill and has three children, was sacrificed. She had won the lottery and had to pay the price. Her overarching goal was to survive the lottery like everybody else. Tessie’s goal was cut short when she got the paper with the black spot. She offered to sacrifice her children just to save herself and also tried to convince people that it wasn’t fair because Bill didn’t have enough time to reap a slip. She was then murdered by the town because of tradition and changed from the beginning of the story to the