ipl-logo

The Advantages Of Plea Bargaining In Law

509 Words3 Pages

Have you ever got your license revoked, or a speeding ticket? Would you plead out for a misdemeanor charge that may ensure your ability to keep that license and your free life? For some, pleading guilty to a crime you know you didn’t commit, is an overload. Plea bargaining is an confessed agreement used in most criminal cases to avoid a long inessential trial. This includes pleading to a lesser charge as well as pleading guilty in exchange for a shorter sentence. Roughly 90% of criminal cases are settled by the plea bargain rather than a jury trial. There are numerous advantages and disadvantages of plea bargaining. While the lawyer and defendant come to an agreement to avoid a prolonged trial in court. Plea bargaining also helps the prosecutors prepare for more serious cases but first settling effortless cases. The case will close much quicker, because courts are already behind months and years of cases. By letting the offenders agree with their accusation. With this bargain, it will make sure the offenders not receive more serious charges for crimes filed against them if other crimes have been committed. Unfortunately, this eventually finds the accused person guilty. Even if you’re innocent, but plead guilty, you will have to pay a fine or be imprisoned for a crime you didn’t commit, also you will have a criminal record that cannot …show more content…

If plea bargains didn’t exist courts will be congested potentially forced to shut down. Lawyers already have thousands of other cases; the lesser trails mean more attention will be to more serious cases. Although the plea bargain is very helpful, it can also give the accused a lighter sentence than he or she so rightly deserves. Plea bargains allow negotiating to enter the court room where the accused would be able to receive a shorter sentence due to the inability to prove whether he or she is without a shadow of doubt guilty then the plea bargain is offered to the

Show More
Related

Research Paper On The West Memphis Three

1244 Words | 5 Pages

Kaitlyn Kline Professor DiFatta Business Law 01 February 2015 The West Memphis three is a case that created quite a stir when it occurred back in the 1993 when the crime occurred and then again in 1994 when there was a conviction. There was a wrongful conviction made when three young men were convicted in this murder case. However, no one questioned it because they were seen as fitting the description of a criminal based upon outside appearances. There were three young boys that were found murdered in a ditch.

Read More

Why Did Bauumer Kill Slade

757 Words | 4 Pages

In 1994 there was a man who went on trial for murder, his name was O.J. Simpson. He was on trial for the death of his ex-wife and a friend of hers. The two were found stabbed to death, O.J. was then put on trial for two accounts of first degree murder. He was found innocent of a technicality. This relates to the story “The Bargain” where a man commits murder but is never put on trial and therefore he never was able to account for his crime.

Read More

The US Marshal Service (USMS)

997 Words | 4 Pages

There are quite a few things I am not allowed to discuss, due to confidentiality, but the things that I can discuss are the observations of court hearings, pre-trials, and revocation hearings. I found it to be very interesting how the judge informs the offender of his or her rights under the United States Constitution before the offender states whether guilty or not and that if the offender pleads guilty that his or her rights are then taken and would rest in the federal courts hands. Usually when the offender pleads guilty, they are under oath, being recorded, and tend to get the lesser sentence, but that is not always the case. It just depends on the case and what all is involved as far as the crime committed and the offender’s history. If the offender pleads not guilty, then there will be a trial that forms on a later date.

Read More

John Pfaff Lock In Sparknotes

1080 Words | 5 Pages

Prosecutors have the power to send offenders away which allows them to make harsh decisions. They offer plea bargains to offenders which often will enable them to do time in prison. Pfaff stated that "as long as prosecutors simply use the tough laws as a bargaining chip, not real punishment, legislators can reap the political benefits of looking tough on crime while avoiding difficult financial decisions" (Pfaff, 2017, P136). Prosecutors offer a plea bargain to get rid of cases quickly and not allow offenders to go to trial because they might receive more prison

Read More

The Pros And Cons Of Plea Bargaining

652 Words | 3 Pages

A plea bargain is an agreement between the prosecutor and the defendant in a criminal case. The prosecutor gives the defendant the opportunity to plead guilty to a lesser charge or to the original charge with less than the maximum sentence. For example, the prosecution and the defense may agree to a misdemeanor charge instead of a felony charge or the parties may agree to a sentence of 12 years instead of 20 years if the recommended sentence for that crime is 10-20 years imprisonment.

Read More

Plea Bargain Research Paper

1308 Words | 6 Pages

Plea bargain are intend for when the prosecutor has enough evidence to put some into prison they can reduce they charges they are being tried with. This will also reduce

Read More

Plea Bargain Essay

1427 Words | 6 Pages

Topic 1: Explain how discretion is used in the court system • What power over the plea-bargaining process does the prosecutor have? What power over the plea bargain does the defense attorney have? How does the judge's discretion come into play? The prosecutor is the only member of the courtroom who has the option of offering a plea bargain to the defendant or refusing to offer a plea bargain.

Read More

Plea Bargaining Advantages

686 Words | 3 Pages

1. According to “A Brief Introduction to Criminal Justice” book plea bargaining is a process of negotiation that usually involves the defendant, the prosecutor, and the defense counsel and is founded on the mutual interests of all involved. The purpose of plea bargaining is for defense attorneys and their clients who will agree to a plea of guilty when they are unsure of their ability to win acquittal at trial. Plea bargaining offers prosecutors the additional advantage of a quick conviction without the need to commit the time and resources necessary for trial.

Read More

What Is The Role Of Plea Bargaining In Criminal Justice

142 Words | 1 Pages

Plea-bargaining dominates the American criminal justice system by offering a reduced sentence to those who stand accused of a crime in exchange for the accused pleading guilty or to a lesser charge and waiving the right to trial. The problem with plea-bargaining is that it lays a heavy burden on the accused while theoretically reducing the burden carried by prosecutors and the court system. Plea-bargaining has trickled its way into the American criminal justice system disguised as a win-win for accused criminals and prosecutors but has weakened the justice system by allowing prosecutors to score guilty pleas from vulnerable individuals and allowing serious criminal offenders walk on lesser charges. Plea-bargaining severely undermines the criminal

Read More

Most Common Strategies Used By Drug Crime Defense Attorney

508 Words | 3 Pages

Sometimes, the best strategy for a drug crime defense attorney is to negotiate a plea bargain. A plea bargain is an agreement between the defense and prosecution, in which the defendant agrees to plead guilty in exchange for reduced charges or a more lenient sentence. This strategy may be appropriate if the evidence against the defendant is strong, or if there is a risk of a harsh sentence if the case goes to trial. Presenting Mitigating Factors

Read More

Misdemeanor Charges In The Criminal Justice System

312 Words | 2 Pages

If You Do Have A Record: If you already have a criminal record and are facing a misdemeanor, you could be

Read More

Australian Legal System Essay

1452 Words | 6 Pages

It allows for cross-examination of evidence presented between the prosecution and defence (adversaries). Although judges when dealing with criminal matters act as independent third parties that simply make a judgement on evidence presented, they still have the ability to enact their own judicial discretion. This refers to the ability for a judge or magistrate to make a decision based upon a range of possibilities on the particular circumstances of a case. In essence, the judge takes into account the mitigating and aggravating factors that can explain or increase respectively the severity of an offence. However much this may allow for alleged offenders to be fairly treated in the trial process, it can be questioned on whether this aspect of the legal system aids in socially preventing crime in contrast to the situational prevention that comes with punishing offenders.

Read More

Evidence That Defendant Is Guilty

851 Words | 4 Pages

I do not think that the plea bargain lets someone off easy. While they might receive a lesser change they also are having the fact that they admitted to doing something taken into consideration by the court system when they decide on the punishment. I feel that it equals out in the long run for those who end up taking the plea bargain. In small cases yes the person might get off with just probation, but is probation was something in condensation then the crime could not have been that detrimental. They would not offer something like probation to a deranged murderer if they confessed to killing someone.

Read More

Race In The Prison System Essay

965 Words | 4 Pages

Since the courts are backlogged and many public defenders and judges being overworked, this causes plea bargaining to be used repeatedly. According to Walker et al. (2018), plea bargaining leaves many people no option but to plea guilty even when this is not their best option. This is due to a multitude of reasons but mainly to receive a lesser charge. For example, a felony and little time in jail may be better than risking multiple felonies and an excessive amount of time in jail.

Read More

Disadvantages Of Restorative Justice

2091 Words | 9 Pages

Batley (2005) stated that restorative justice is about restoring, healing and re- integrating victims, offenders, as well as the society and also preventing further harm. In this assignment, I will be discussing approaches to restorative justice and illustrating their advantages and disadvantages to offending. I will also provide the applications of these five approaches of restorative justice which are retributive approach, utilitarian deterrence approach, rehabilitation approach, restitution approach and restorative approach in the given case study. I will then explain my preferred approach to justice through identifying a personal belief or value that underpins my choice.

Read More

More about The Advantages Of Plea Bargaining In Law

Open Document