ipl-logo

Most Common Strategies Used By Drug Crime Defense Attorney

508 Words3 Pages

Drug crimes are serious offenses that can lead to significant legal consequences. If you are facing drug crime charges, it is essential to work with a skilled drug crime defense attorney who can help you navigate the legal system and protect your rights. There are several different strategies that drug crime defense attorneys may use to defend their clients.

Challenging the Evidence
One of the most common strategies used by drug crime defense attorneys is to challenge the evidence that the prosecution has against their client. This could involve questioning the legality of the search and seizure, the chain of custody of the evidence, or the reliability of any witnesses or informants. If the evidence is found to be inadmissible, the charges …show more content…

Entrapment occurs when law enforcement officers persuade someone to commit a crime that they would not have otherwise committed. In drug cases, this could involve an undercover officer coercing someone to sell drugs to them or manufacturing a drug-related crime.

network error it, this could be a viable defense. Demonstrating a lack of knowledge or intent can be challenging, but if successful, it can result in reduced charges or a not-guilty verdict.

Negotiating a Plea Bargain
Sometimes, the best strategy for a drug crime defense attorney is to negotiate a plea bargain. A plea bargain is an agreement between the defense and prosecution, in which the defendant agrees to plead guilty in exchange for reduced charges or a more lenient sentence. This strategy may be appropriate if the evidence against the defendant is strong, or if there is a risk of a harsh sentence if the case goes to trial.

Presenting Mitigating Factors
In some cases, the defense may argue that the defendant's actions were mitigated by circumstances beyond their control. For example, if the defendant was struggling with addiction or mental health issues, their attorney may argue that their actions were a result of these factors. If successful, this strategy could result in reduced charges or a more lenient sentence.

Arguing Constitutional

Show More
Related
2586 Words | 11 Pages

In a "dial-a-dope" scenario, clients typically communicate with the dealer to specify the desired quantity and type of drugs, and then agree on a location for the exchange, often in public spaces like parking lots or street corners. This is similar to the situation involving Ms. Yates, where an orange ball of cocaine was concealed in the tire hub during the exchange. In 2016, a case with similarities to a "dial-a-dope" trafficking prosecution, R. v. Jordan, established a precedent regarding drug trafficking. This case emphasized that, even for serious drug-related offenses, an unjustifiable and prolonged delay in bringing the case to trial cannot be justified R. v. Jordan, 2016 SCC 27 (CanLII), [2016] 1

Read More
1080 Words | 5 Pages

Prosecutors have the power to send offenders away which allows them to make harsh decisions. They offer plea bargains to offenders which often will enable them to do time in prison. Pfaff stated that "as long as prosecutors simply use the tough laws as a bargaining chip, not real punishment, legislators can reap the political benefits of looking tough on crime while avoiding difficult financial decisions" (Pfaff, 2017, P136). Prosecutors offer a plea bargain to get rid of cases quickly and not allow offenders to go to trial because they might receive more prison

Read More
652 Words | 3 Pages

A plea bargain is an agreement between the prosecutor and the defendant in a criminal case. The prosecutor gives the defendant the opportunity to plead guilty to a lesser charge or to the original charge with less than the maximum sentence. For example, the prosecution and the defense may agree to a misdemeanor charge instead of a felony charge or the parties may agree to a sentence of 12 years instead of 20 years if the recommended sentence for that crime is 10-20 years imprisonment.

Read More
1308 Words | 6 Pages

Marcus J. Paulus 2/14/2018 Plea Paper Plea Paper          The plea bargain is necessary part of our justice system. This is because of the vast number of cases our justice system has to deal with each year it would be almost impossible to take all these cases to court each year. Plea bargains give people the chance to reduced there sentence by admitting they committed the crime or a less crime in order for the prosecutor to get a guilty verdict.          The plea bargain process is supposed to be introduced to the discussion but they prosecutor and not the defendant.

Read More
752 Words | 4 Pages

Without facts and evidence to prove someone's guilt it's impossible to convict them of the

Read More
799 Words | 4 Pages

Pleas also give the defendant some certainty in sentencing, where often charges are reduced or withdrawn, and the range of sentencing options decreases when a deal is struck with the prosecutor. The mitigation of the sentence can have a positive effect on the defendant, because it has been shown that longer and harsher sentences do not reduce the risk of recidivism and can be detrimental to the offender. Longer jail terms are also more expensive than less restrictive sanctions, so this can also reduce the spending of state money. and spare victims the trauma of testifying in

Read More
1023 Words | 5 Pages

The charge given to the defendant, in theory, limits the penalties faced if the defendant decides to go to trial. Even though being found innocent is the best possible outcome for someone

Read More
705 Words | 3 Pages

This article wants to fix the problem of the entrapment system being unclear and sketchy. If a tactic has unclear rules and some grey areas, it can be abused and missed used. This article wants to relocate boundaries on the system and help rethink entrapment. The intended audience for this article is for our law enforcement system and government. This article wants to change the way the structure

Read More
987 Words | 4 Pages

There are cases stacked upon cases that must be attended to daily, while at the same time, crimes are being committed. The court system has trouble keeping up, and in order to cease long, drawn out trials, plea bargaining has been allowed in the criminal justice system. This is useful for both criminally charge individuals along with the courts themselves for several reasons. Most people know the case going on with Jared Fogle, the former representor of Subway. In 2015, Fogle decided to plead guilty to child pornography charges along with crossing state lines to exchange money for sex with a minor (Castillo, 2015).

Read More
786 Words | 4 Pages

There are other options to traditional prosecution besides simply filing charges. Examples include: diversion, differed prosecution, and deferred sentencing. Each of these strategies offers opportunities for offenders to fulfill some responsibility in exchange for the prosecutor’s decision to avoid or put off formal charges. The first one is called Diversion; the term refers to any number of informal methods of steering offenders out of the Criminal Justice system. (Siegel, Larry J. 207)

Read More
227 Words | 1 Pages

The prosecutor must show the jury beyond a reasonable doubt that the person arrested

Read More
572 Words | 3 Pages

To begin this process, the Defendant and his or her attorney hold a meeting with Federal Agents from the departments relevant to the charges/crimes being discussed (i.e., DOJ, DEA, ATF, IRS, etc.) and the Assistant U.S. Attorney. Following a successful Proffer, the criminal Defendant receives a Cooperation Agreement outlining the benefits he or she is receiving for assisting the government. The Proffer

Read More
509 Words | 3 Pages

Plea bargaining is an confessed agreement used in most criminal cases to avoid a long inessential trial. This includes pleading to a lesser charge as well as pleading guilty in exchange for a shorter sentence. Roughly 90% of criminal cases are settled by the plea bargain rather than a jury trial. There are numerous advantages and disadvantages of plea bargaining. While the lawyer and defendant come to an agreement to avoid a prolonged trial in court.

Read More
903 Words | 4 Pages

Whther it is based on the basic requirements of the party and state policy, or based on the pursuit of the essence of the spirit of protecting human rights, criminal defense effectiveness is a practice to solve and important problem in theory have to consider. The current study are "cookie-cutter" to defend the effectiveness of implementation in the hope of improvement of the system of criminal procedural law on defense. Although the effects of related program design is an important factor in achieving effectiveness to defend, in today's defense system is increasingly perfect, defense effectiveness problem especially criminal entity effectiveness is cured, the most fundamental problem actually lies not in the program system is imperfect,

Read More
1692 Words | 7 Pages

Criminology Case Study: Meredith Kercher Name Academic Institution Author Note Class Professor Date TABLE OFCONTENTS1 CASE/OFFENDER 3 OFFENSE/CRIME 4 MOTIVATIONS/BACKGROUND 4 THEORY 5 VICTIMS 6 COSTS 7 ADJUDICATION/DISPOSITION (PROSECUTION/SENTENCING) 7 CONCLUSION 8 REFERENCES 10 Criminology Case Study: Meredith Kercher

Read More

More about Most Common Strategies Used By Drug Crime Defense Attorney

Related Topics

Open Document