ipl-logo

The Argument Against Hate Speech

1527 Words7 Pages

Flames, teargas, riots, city blocks destroyed, in consequence to a statement. In today 's modern society, rude acts of communication known as hate speech, have become a controversial topic in America. Although hate speech is awful, it should be protected by the first amendment. Hate speech should be permitted because omitting such phrases would set a precedent for censorship and repress the minority. Such censorship would lead to a totalitarian rule by the majority . While hate speech should be better understood, bigoted acts should not be included in hate speech or harmful subjective phrases. hate speech has become a spotlight topic and there is a discussion if free speech should protect it. The main opposition against free speech being an …show more content…

If we were to continue allowing hate speech where do we draw the line with hateful actions. In America, as a first world country, people should feel safe with who they are. In the case of the Westboro Baptist church, they protested funeral after funeral of a veteran after veteran(Mears). This caused people morning at the funerals to feel unsafe when they are at their weakest. A consensus along the side of banning speech is that we are to civil to have hate speech. “this issue has already been decided; impugning someone because of their race, gender or orientation is not acceptable in a civil society”(McElwee). Because of this people shouldn 't be up to someone 's genetics to decide how they should be treated modern society. The consensus from the other side is all speech should be protected, but only blatant offensive actions should be banned. Speech is a fundamental right and should be protected. “Think about it. It’s always easier to defend someone’s right to say something with which you agree. But in a free society, you also have a duty to defend speech to which you may strongly object”(mighty constitutional opposites). that is what separates the united states from a fascist country in that they protect all forms of speech. On the topic of hateful actions, only actions such as direct threats should be prosecuted and general hatred should be allowed. “The spectrum of hateful expression is broad, encompassing acts that are clearly illegal — such as firebombing a mosque …show more content…

“The Case for Censoring Hate Speech.” The Huffington Post,
TheHuffingtonPost.com, 24 July 2013, www.huffingtonpost.com/sean-mcelwee/hate-speech-online_b_3620270.html.
Mears, Bill. “Anti-Gay Church 's Right to Protest at Military Funerals Is Upheld.” CNN,
Cable News Network, 2 Mar. 2011, www.cnn.com/2011/US/03/02/scotus.westboro.church/index.ht “Mighty Constitutional Opposites.” ABA Division for Public Education: Students:
Debating the "Mighty Constitutional Opposites": Hate Speech Debate, ABA Division for Public Education, www.americanbar.org/groups/public_education/initiatives_awards/students_in_action/debate_hate.html. Schulzke, Marcus. "The Social Benefits of Protecting Hate Speech and Exposing
Sources of Prejudice." Res Publica (13564765), vol. 22, no. 2, May 2016, pp. 225-242. EBSCOhost, doi:10.1007/s11158-015-9282-1.
Stanley, Jay. “Civil Rights Movement Is a Reminder That Free Speech Is There to
Protect the Weak.” American Civil Liberties Union, American Civil Liberties Union, 30 May 2017, www.aclu.org/blog/free-speech/civil-rights-movement-reminder-free-speech-there-protect-weak. Tucker , Eric. “How Federal Law Draws a Line between Free

Show More
Related

How Does This Chapter Support Toobin's Overall Point Of The Supreme Court

1331 Words | 6 Pages

“By the mid nineties, the issue couldn’t exclude religious speakers from the list” The new look of religious cases allowed for people to go against the law of religious freedom. - pg 113 “But the stat denied a request heightened the differences between them.” The law of freedom of speech works for many terrible groups of people, making them question if they are actually doing the right thing. Support:

Read More

James Keegstra Case Analysis

1148 Words | 5 Pages

The suppression of hate propaganda signifies an infringement of individual’s freedom of expression. An activity that conveys a message through non-violent forms of expression is protected under the s.2 of the Charter regardless of how offensive it is. Moreover, there was a misapplication of Charter, which made s.319 (2) of the Criminal Code to fail the proportionality test. There was no relation between the criminalization of hate speech and its suppression. Although his comments were offensive, they did not pose any threats they way violence or violence threats would have.

Read More

First Amendment Rights: The Westboro Baptist Church

355 Words | 2 Pages

First Amendment rights are guaranteed to all American citizens, but current free speech issues are testing Constitutional boundaries. Where must the line be drawn between free speech and infringement upon others’ rights? Is there some speech so cruel and so appalling that it does not merit protection? These issues have been raised by the recent activities of the Westboro Baptist Church. Based out of Topeka, Kansas[1], this small group of radicals is marked by their hateful views and their contempt for homosexuality. The Westboro Baptist Church has gained notoriety and sparked national outrage with their offensive acts, particularly by protesting the funerals of fallen soldiers.

Read More

Analysis Of Night By Elie Wiesel

912 Words | 4 Pages

Currently, the United State’s criterion on Speech includes, “obscenity, fraud, child pornography, harassment, incitement to illegal conduct and imminent lawless action, true threats, and commercial speech such as advertising, copyright or patent rights” (Gaudefroy 3). However, speech involving discriminatory words or racial intentions are protected by the law. To avoid instances that degrade the minority group, stricter rules need to be enforced on the delicate topic. Restrictions on hate speech should include usage of “misogynistic, homophobic, racist, and conspiracy-laden language” (Gaudefroy 3). Efforts to restrict these types of beliefs would create a more safe and equal society for all individuals.

Read More

Racist Speech As The Functional Equivalent Of Fighting Words

707 Words | 3 Pages

The First Amendment aims to protect the right of freedom of religion and the right of freedom of expression of all United States citizens. However, Lawrence states “The Supreme Court has held that words that ‘by their very utterance inflict injury or intend to incite an immediate breach of the peace’ are not constitutionally protected.” (Lawrence, pg 175) The First Amendment does not protect speech that maintains a sole purpose to inflict harm on other people. “Racial insults are undeserving for First Amendment protection because the perpetrator’s intention is not to discover truth or initiate dialogue, but to injure the victim” (Lawrence, pg 175)

Read More

Should The First Amendment Be Considered Hateful?

107 Words | 1 Pages

In my interpretation of the First Amendment, the rights of the people to freely express their opinions, even if unpopular, is clearly protected. Specifically, hate speech is not clearly defined and may differ between people. Individuals and groups can disagree on if specific issues may be considered hateful. Advocates of, what some may consider as hate speech, will likely disagree that their opinions on an issue would be considered hate speech. Protecting all speech, including hate speech, should only imply that the government is following the first amendment to not interfere or be prejudice against anyone expressing their opinions if done so with regard to other laws.

Read More

Charles Lawrence Racist Speech Summary

770 Words | 4 Pages

Borders of the First Amendment are at the center of the legal debates about free speech and hate speech. While free speech is considered to be a basic right, as the Supreme Court has given the right to free speech. However, when such "free speech" crosses the line and becomes a threat, the courts have stepped in and punished the speaker. First Amendment does not protect free speech that has the intention of doing harm or damage.

Read More

The Pros And Cons Of Publishing Hate Speech

197 Words | 1 Pages

It is a very difficult and complex issue whether to publish hate speech or not. Anthony Lewis(2007) believed that hate speech makes us aware of terrible circumstances and enhances our resolve to combat them. But on the other hand, hate speech is expressed and transmitted by hatred rather than beneficial information. And the hatred is detrimental to the interests of society, and as well as desecrate to personal dignity. It is a violation of personal personality and reputation.

Read More

Should Hate Speech And Should It Be Protected Under The First Amendment?

285 Words | 2 Pages

Although hate speech is bigoted, hate-mongering, and can potentially lead to hate crimes, it should still be considered free speech. If citizens of the United States are not allowed to be verbal about their beliefs, whether or not they are offensive and hateful, then there is no use in allowing free speech. Placing limitations on free speech contradicts the First Amendment, therefore making it inaccurate and useless.

Read More

The Controversy Of Banning Free Speech Or Hate Speech

1411 Words | 6 Pages

When does free speech end and hate speech begin? Everyone in the US has freedom of speech because of the first amendment which protects that right. Hate speech is constitutionally protected as freedom of speech. What this means is that hate speech is still a part of free speech, even though hate speech may be different from regular speech. Legally whether or not it

Read More

Personal Statement: Participating In The Political World

1694 Words | 7 Pages

A person should be able to say as they are pleased no matter who it may offend if there is no clear and present danger. However, that person should realize that there will be an opposing side and there is nothing that can be done about it. It is possible for hate speeches to turn into hate crimes, as that is highly unacceptable as it would be prohibited under my circumstances of allowing hate speech. When we allow hate speech who could it really be hurting when someone could easily oppose of it? If hate speech does cause extra violence then those who initiated the violence should be punished.

Read More

Freedom Of Speech In College Essay

905 Words | 4 Pages

The idea of free speech on college campuses and the complications of it stem from those on campuses expressing views that don’t align with popular views. Implications for students who use the idea of free speech as a method for hateful actions and comments should be reprimanded, but the question remains as to whether schools should enforce tougher limitations. The freedom of speech on college campus expands to the freedoms of religion, assembly, press, and protest as well. Freedom of expression allows students to show their own political, social, and cultural views. Removing freedoms of speech and expression have consequences deeper than surface issues.

Read More

Argumentative Essay On Freedom Of Speech

817 Words | 4 Pages

We can’t misuse the freedom of speech, saying words that can cause serious harm (bullying). This form of speech will cause depression, suicide, and stunted social development. When freedom of speech hurts others, then it is not just an opinion anymore; it is a form of hate

Read More

The Role Of Hate Speech In Social Media

1259 Words | 6 Pages

Firstly, Ring (2013) wrote about a thesis entitled “Hate Speech in Social Media: an Exploration of the Problem and Its Proposed solutions”. This study research shows that although most major social media companies such as Google, Facebook and Twitter have their own policies regarding whether and what kinds of hate speech that are permitted on their sites, the policies are often inconsistently applied and can be difficult for users to understand. In Ring’s dissertation, she suggested that social media platforms have to encourage self-regulation about what kind of hate speech contents are, and those contents are not permitted on these sites. Forming A working group comprised of social media decision makers will develop the policy and staff members of the Federal Communications Commission will facilitate this process. The focus of her study is the legal communication and scholars of those social media regulations.

Read More

The Consequences Of Hate Speech

2345 Words | 10 Pages

Hate speech is not always grounded in reality and often driven by ignorance to the facts rather than experience and real prejudice. Some may argue that it is just harmless prejudice and our rights are threatened if we condemn it. SO is it the right to free speech or the right to insult? Racism, bigotry, political views and views about religions in fact, most views are learnt in the family home, then the education system, society, media and TV finish the indoctrination. The damage done to groups in society that are targeted is many faceted.

Read More

More about The Argument Against Hate Speech

Related Topics

Open Document