3.2 Leverage Key Subcontractor & Partner Management GiaMed Resources JV, LLC is a JV between GiaCare, Inc. and MedTrust, LLC and formed in accordance with the requirements for JV agreements under the SBA Mentor-Protégé Program. GiaCare and MedTrust have been working together for almost a decade, building a long-lasting relationship based on similar cultures and missions. Through the SBA 8(a) approved Mentor/Protégé program, each member has successfully performed on federal contracts – both individually as a Prime/Sub and through our JVs. Both MedTrust and GiaCare, are fully capable of providing the services required under the resultant contract, yet we recognize a low risk comprehensive solution to the Navy is needed. Therefore, we have included
Case Citation: Gallagher v. Cayuga Medical Center 151 AD 3d 1349 - NY: Appellate Div., 3rd Dept. 2017 Background: In this civil case Timothy W. Gallagher is the appellant, and Cayuga Medical Center (CMC) is the respondents. The case took place in the appellate division of the supreme court of New York, division three. The plaintiff’s complaint was that Cayuga Medical Center had asserted medical malpractice, negligence, wrongful death and emotional distressed.
In the case of Tomcik vs. Ohio Department of Rehabilitation and Corrections, Janet Tomcik, the plaintiff, blamed the loss of her right breast on the fact that there was a major delay in her examination and treatment of her tumor. This could be known as nonfeasance negligence, which is the “failure to act when there is a duty to act,” (Pozgar, 2016). The corrections department, or in this case, the defendant, claimed that Tomcik`s cancer was already so developed, that her breast would have been removed regardless of when her official checkup and treatment took place. One stakeholder in this case is Janet Tomcik. She is the patient who not only lost her breast, but endured “physical pain, [and] emotional suffering,” (Tomcik, 1991).
The University of Notre Dame argues that they do not owe Letitia Hayden a duty to protect her from the third party’s actions. The reasoning behind this was that the actions of a third party are unforeseeable, therefore Notre Dame owed Letitia Hayden no duty to anticipate the actions and protect her. Therefore, Notre Dame is not liable. Holdings
This private law case describes the reaction of parents awaiting the arrival of their child, only to later find out that the sperm donor, was diagnosed with several mental disorderos. This is a private law case because the 10 families sued the company Xytex for providing inaccurate information from their donor. Aggeles, their donor, claimed to be a doctor, healthy and as smart as Einstein which obviously was not the case. Providing sperm for 36 children, which all could possibly carry the gene of a mental disorder was not something these parents signed up for. Xytex claimed that they aware parents that they do not verify donors background information.
The caregivers lacked commitment, compassion, conscientiousness, fairness and honesty, and if they had taken their jobs seriously probably Tomcik wouldn’t have suffered as much. Trial began on July 22, 1991 and the decision was made on October 7, 1991. Tomcik’s total damage came out to be $85,000 according to the text. The defendants were proven wrong and they were charged. The court did the right thing, but I think a stricter action should have been taken against the defendants.
The American legal system hears many cases relating to liability, but surprisingly, most of these cases concern the prosecutors within their own legal system. In the Supreme Court case Connick v. Thompson, a district attorney’s office denied liability for the extreme misconduct of its prosecutors. The Supreme Court decided that the D.A. office was not liable for the actions of their prosecutors because they did not have a pattern of Brady violations. Contrary to the decision in Connick v. Thompson, the D.A. office should have been held liable for the misconduct of its prosecutors. Brady violations appeared throughout the case, other cases of Brady violations in that D.A. office, and the office’s blatant neglect to properly train its prosecutors.
The case of R. v. Schoenborn is a troubling case involving the death of three children and the defence of not criminally responsible on account of mental disorder. This defence must be critically analyzed along with the evidence and expert opinions as it could absolve the accused of the charges. As well, the precedent that the verdict provides is critical to the legal system and its future implication and thus give the decision more importance. After a thorough examination of the facts, it is evident that the verdict of the Supreme Court of British Columbia is correct and reflects the administration’s objectives and beliefs. This will be demonstrated through the application of legal principles and elements.
This is because the time frame after was from so long ago that there was not going to be much evidence presented to prove them “guilty.” The laws were so different back then that cases such as this would be hard to prove. Overall, because of this time period, the medical field took advantage of an individual. Disregarding the time period, any medical field should not take any opportunity that makes them take advantage of one’s given human
She further presents the cases as the source of empowerment for the young women to stand their grounds and marry against the wish of their parents (Sloan, 62). Besides, she explains that most girls presented “maltreatment at home” as their main reason for eloping with their prospective husbands, further challenging the authority of their parents. Sloan (122) narrates with evidence how the youth “alluded to a set of mutual obligations” within the members of a family, their suitors and the family of the partners so as to create rationale for their actions. Through the rapto cases, the youth slowly gained insight in the legal aspects and soon recognized “their status as individuals with rights and guarantees and could wield these concepts effectively in their dispositions and arguments before the judge” (Sloan154). Their understanding of their individual rights fueled them to stage allegations against the parents who either failed or were unable to meet the “end of the bargain”
Compl. at 7-8, 16. However, negligence cannot give rise to action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. See Williams v. Field, 416 F.2d 483, 485 (9th Cir. 1969). (“In order to be actionable under section 1983 … we believe that more than an isolated incident of negligent failure to protect must be alleged.
The corrupt and unjust have held power for so long, and while they may
Another layer of white supremacy was in the courts as Assata was being charged for bank robbery and kidnapping, which seem to be a stage theater to give the illusion of a fair trial when in fact it was just another tool to continue to subjugate African American. The bank robbery case was suspicious when the F.B.I. started to fingerprint and took photographs of Assata in the same clothing as the bank robbers and at the same angle. However, what got the case, postpone was the judge and his inability to contain his prejudice saying that he thought Assata was guilty and when the case resumed still were not able to get a conviction. The other case of the kidnapping of the drug dealer (James freeman), which quickly fell apart when Freeman testify and was asked if he was being coerce to frame Assata, he
Although the Diane Downs case involved a murder many mothers have chosen their romantic interest over their children. Many women who choose to neglect their children for men usually live in poor conditions such as when a single mother can’t provide for her family she will find a man who can take care of business within the household, usually when single mothers find men to take care of their families the men tend to be abusive and sometimes sexual to children. A mother’s neglect and unwilling to put the needs of her children before her own can turn into a vicious cycle of abuse and substance abuse to forget what the last family line did to them in the past. Male and female children handle neglect and violence in different ways, female children
“Medical malpractice claims and lawsuits deal with Improper, unskilled, or negligent treatment of a patient by a physician, dentist, nurse, pharmacist, or other health care professional. Negligence is the predominant theory of liability concerning allegations of medical malpractice, making this type of litigation part of Tort Law. Since the 1970s, medical malpractice has been a controversial social issue. Physicians have complained about the large number of malpractice suits and have urged legal reforms to curb large damage awards, whereas tort attorneys have argued that negligence suits are an effective way of compensating victims of negligence and of policing the medical profession. A person who alleges negligent medical malpractice
