In the book “Watchmen as Literature,” Sara Van Ness explores the complex theme of vigilantism in the graphic novel “Watchmen” by Alan Moore and Dave Gibbons. She examines how each character in “Watchmen” differs in their approach to seeking justice and the ethical implications of their actions. Furthermore, their world demonstrates that villainy and heroism are all a matter of perspective. In chapter six of Van Ness’s book, she argues that the vigilantism theme in “Watchmen” reflects broader cultural anxieties of the 1980s and prompts readers to consider whether the ends justify the means.
Sara Van Ness begins this chapter with an excerpt from President Reagan’s speech in March of 1983, in which he announced his plans for a Strategic Defense
…show more content…
“The ways in which each of the four main characters reacts to these ambiguous laws determines how he is subsequently viewed by society” (104). The four main characters, Nite Owl, Silk Spectre, Rorschach, and Dr. Manhattan are prohibited from using their superhero abilities. Nite Owl and Silk Spectre struggle with their identities as superheroes and feel they have lost their place in a society that no longer values their services. Nite Owl is conflicted about continuing to be a vigilante, and the public perceives his lack of action as cowardice. On the other hand, Silk Specter feels a sense of duty to her country, but others perceive her as weak due to her compliance with the law. Rorschach continues his work, disregarding the new law, and later becomes widely known as a vigilante. He feels that the laws are corrupt, so he takes a hardline stance and continues to protect the innocent. His uncompromising attitude puts him at odds with Nite Owl, his former partner, and the rest of society. Dr. Manhattan works as a secret weapon for the government since he possesses God-like powers. Though he works in accordance with them, they cannot control him or his actions. He feels detached from humanity ad does not feel compelled to obey societal laws, and this lack of concern for human affairs causes him to …show more content…
For example, she does not fully address the potential harm that vigilantism can cause, nor does she explore alternative means of achieving justice beyond the confines of traditional systems. Additionally, her analysis of heroism and vigilantism seems limited to the context of Watchmen and needs to fully consider the broader implications of her arguments in real-world scenarios. Overall, while Van Ness’s argument provides valuable insights into the complexity of vigilantism and heroism, it is essential to consider alternative perspectives and explore the potential limitations of her