ipl-logo

The Controversy Of Choosing A Parliamentary System For Westphalia

1420 Words6 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Advantages and disadvantages of parliamentary and presidential government

Regarding the executive system for Westphalia, a parliamentary system would be most beneficial for various reasons. Our main objective is to satisfy both the New Socialists as well as foreign observers. With a parliamentary system, it would appear that we are concentrating power in a legislative body with various individuals rather than a sole individual under a presidential system. Foreign observers could be alarmed if we chose a presidential system because under that system, only one single person could yield power. Although there could be multiple advantages for the Westphalian Nationalists under a presidential system, it’s not worth the headache nor the trouble of attempting to appease foreigners due to the concentration of power.
Parliamentary …show more content…

Both the United States and Canada use this system and we can argue that in support of it. It prevents a single chamber from essentially “rushing” through legislation that could be unpopular. However, in order to stick to our goal, we could make it to where one chamber has little to no power in respect to legislation while the other chamber creates and votes on the actual legislation. An example of this would be the Senate of Canada; it rarely rejects legislation from the House of Commons and cannot purpose legislation that appropriates funds or centers around taxes, leaving most of the legislative power the House of Commons. By focusing most legislative powers in one chamber, the New Socialists would satisfied because they’d get their ten legislative seats, only in the chamber will little to no power, but they’ll receive their seats …show more content…

Firstly with Italy, it consists of a closed-list party system where voters cast their votes for parties rather than candidates themselves. When a party is declared victorious, the party heads then determine who within the party will fill the seats. Determining who will fill the seats involves party loyalty, campaign donations, strong track record, importance to the party, popularity/favorability, etc. Whereas the lower house in the United Kingdom and both houses in the United States concentrates around single-member districts and a plurality of votes. As mentioned earlier, candidates under this system only need to garner the most votes in an election to win. Whether that is one more vote than your opponent, or fifty more votes than your

Show More
Related
2310 Words | 10 Pages

The person who gets the highest number of votes is considered duly elected in their congressional

Read More
450 Words | 2 Pages

Does your vote really count? When you vote for

Read More
529 Words | 3 Pages

It is also an unfair system leaning favor towards the wealthy. Individuals wishing to play a role in the legislature may be prohibited due to the low salary and the need to be able to leave their jobs every two years for 140

Read More
576 Words | 3 Pages

This divide of power between central and state government helps prevent tyranny. When the Constitution talks about dividing powers between branches of Government it states, “Liberty requires that the great departments of powers should be separate and distinct.” Which means, that the Legislative Branch is completely

Read More
1781 Words | 8 Pages

A mixed republic government would allow for a “free and independent exercise of judgment” thus, preventing the government from having absolute power.  Adams continues to state that the legislative power must be more complex; as in if one power is wholly in one assembly and the executive in another, the two powers can simultaneously oppose one another until the strongest branch of power wins.  Upon this argument, Adams addresses the idea that each state must have a “district assembly” who stands as a “mediator” between the people and the government.  The idea of mixed government was in order to provide a sense of stability through the success of a republic where offices of state are elected upon “virtue” and not of hierarchical inheritance.  

Read More
738 Words | 3 Pages

So your vote counts just as much as everyone else in your state. It just may not count as much or as less than someone

Read More
968 Words | 4 Pages

Most countries in the world that practice democracy use a multi-party system. The United States does practice democracy, but only uses two parties when going through elections. The parties are the democrats and the republicans. One person from each party is chosen to represent their party. The presidential election is when those two representatives from each party go head to head to try to win the vote of as many states they can.

Read More
805 Words | 4 Pages

The bicameralism design was a better institutional design due to the fact that it served to better give representation at the national level to citizens of different classes of societies and regions. The bicameralism design was also more institutionally effective because it allowed a checks and balances system where as one group could not strictly dominate and be pushed by popular ways of thinking at the time. In this system, each state would have representation based upon their population in one house and the states would each have two representatives in the other. One advantage of this system was that the citizens would have varied representation, however with the senate it would not be as influenced as the house since their terms were longer and usually their decisions were not based on immediate popular opinion but based on what was good for the citizens and could hinder legislation that appeared to be flawed or reckless. Third, the Constitution was designed to be able to change or be amended as times evolved.

Read More
675 Words | 3 Pages

You are voting for the Electoral College vote and then they are voting for the

Read More
582 Words | 3 Pages

Ken Kesey was born on September 17, 1935 in La Junta, Colorado. He attended the University of Oregon and graduated with a degree in speech and communication in 1957. He enrolled in the creative writing program at Stanford University in 1958, where he developed lifelong friendships with a number of authors. It was during this time he participated in army experiments involving LSD and guinea pigs. These experiences inspired him to write his first novel.

Read More
325 Words | 2 Pages

Many images of the pile of bodies is not only disturbing but it shows viewers of what conditions the Nazi’s treated the prisoners. It was due to these treatments and experiments which led to the demise of over a million innocent men, women, and children. They were placed into camps, placed under conditions which made these diseases thrive. And due to the nature of war, many of the images taken during both world wars were mostly to take in the account of what was truly happening, what people looked like, what people did, and how people were treated.

Read More
1520 Words | 7 Pages

A political

Read More
1131 Words | 5 Pages

They are responsible, as the guiding committee of Parliament, for the preparation and enactment of most legislation and of the budget. Now, the Republic system as opposed to the Westminster system is one of representative government, while the Westminster system is one of responsible government, which means that the executive is responsible to the legislature, and requires its confidence to remain in power. While in the U.S system, the executive are separate from the legislature, in the

Read More
1312 Words | 6 Pages

As a result, most voters could become disinterested in the democratic process because they have no meaningful way to express their true preferences. What could be worse is three

Read More
944 Words | 4 Pages

Bagehot once described this feature “as the close union…of the executive and legislative powers.” Unlike the presidential system, which is in operation in the USA, the parliamentary

Read More

More about The Controversy Of Choosing A Parliamentary System For Westphalia

Related Topics

Open Document