Pros And Cons Of Texas Legislature

529 Words3 Pages

The age old question of how much government is too much government swarms around the topic of the Texas Legislature and the current part-time, citizen model which is in place. The outcome of the terms of policy outcome are for the most part determined by an individual’s political viewpoint. Liberals lean towards a full time, active government addressing social affairs. Conservatives support a minimal, limited role and less governmental interference. In order to explore this further, the reasoning for both part-time and full-time legislatures must be evaluated with pros and cons being considered.
Texas legislatures have other sources of employment, receive $7,200 per year with a per diem allowance for expenses and meet only 140 days once every two years. According to Rick Perry, the Texas model reduces propensity to corruptions since additional employment is required in the private sector to supplement the low salary. According to Perry’s reasoning, the temptation to pass laws restricting liberties is also reduced by the part-time legislature having a small, limited time frame. …show more content…

This model requires commitment to the profession. In addition, the additional time provides opportunities for deliberation and would increase the ability to make sensible policies. The limited time from results in dependence on full time staff, the need to call additional special sessions and leaves important issues unresolved. It is also an unfair system leaning favor towards the wealthy. Individuals wishing to play a role in the legislature may be prohibited due to the low salary and the need to be able to leave their jobs every two years for 140