More handpicked essays just for you.
Alexander the greats impact on the world
Alexander the greats impact on the world
Alexander the greats impact on the world
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
He then set off and conquered Egypt, the Persian Empire, and won a hard battle against India before his troops forced him to return home. Alexander then died at the age of 32. Most people see Alexander as Great because he conquered a lot of land, built a massive empire, and was a military genius, but Alexander was not so great. Alexander the Great did not deserve his title as Great because he gained his power by fear, killed innocent
Throughout history, there has been great military leaders come and go. Although, one of the most well-known conquerors is Alexander the Great. Many people thought he was a good leader and a good king. However, the people he conquered think otherwise. The people who supported him say he was compassionate towards others.
He was not great because he didn’t show concern for others, leadership, or intelligence. Alexander the Great was not the best because of his mass amounts of murder, not much care for his soldiers, and his poor ability to lead. The first reason Alexander the Great is not amazing because of the mass amount of murder he committed. One example is during the battle at Tyre, once Alexander’s army broke into the city they went on a ferocious killing spree (Doc C). Alexander had ordered anyone that was not inside the temple to be slain and he killed seven thousand Tyrians.
One reason why Alexander of Macedonia should be called Alexander the Great is that he was very influential. For instance, in Document E, it states that his empire was held together for a very long time after his death. It took him 11 years to build his empire, and it held together for 10 years. This shows that since he had a big influence on his people, they continued to follow his ways of life (E). In addition, for 1000 years, Greek was the official language of Jordan, in the Middle East (E).
Did you know that Alexander the Great was one of the greatest conquers? Alexander was born in 358 B.C. and he lived in a kingdom in Greece called Macedonia. Alexander was the son of the King Phillip II, and Alexander became king. During his life, did Alexander show enough leadership, courage, and concern for others to be considered great? By these measures, Alexander was great for at least three reasons: military genius, inspiring leader, and spread of Greek cultures.
Despite Alexander not being politically great, society remembers him as great because of his military prowess
Alexander the Great was not great because of his disrespect for others. His Greek officers left him for a village of Hindu Kush people ( Doc F). This demonstrates that if Alexander was so great then why would his officers just leave him unless he did something that made them feel disrespected or feel uncomfortable. Alexander killed trained elephants
“And then she was still, for Lennie had broken her neck” (Steinbeck 91). The novella Of Mice and Men by John Steinbeck takes place in the 1930’s during the Great Depression. During this time period, many men would travel looking for work and would end up working for a rich ranch owner. Most of this novella takes place at a ranch owned by a wealthy man in Soledad, California. At this ranch, Curley’s wife is a very present and ornate character; however, she is not at all respected.
He spread Greek culture around the world and united the great Persian empire. Alexander created many cities, including Alexandria. These were bustling cities during his rule. Alexander was very effective because he was able to blend two cultures, had a great military, and gained the trust of the people.
In fact, due to his education from the great philosopher of Aristotle and preparation for kingship, Alexander “developed a rather high opinion of himself, including the growing belief that he himself was a god” (Background Essay). Later in life, as shown on the map entitled “Alexander’s Empire,” Alexander named eleven of his established cities “Alexandria” (Document A.) Not only does this show a lack of creativity, but also his large amount of self-obsession. During a journey across a desert, Alexander’s troops (who were already dying of thirst themselves), found a small trickle of water and carried what they could back to their leader. However, Alexander dumped the helmet of water onto the ground, completely wasting the good deed his soldiers had performed for him.
Alexander the Great was a successful leader and tactician. Even though he was successful in these departments, we don’t see much of his politician skills being used. Alexander the Great, born in the northern kingdom of Greece, Macedonia, is easily one of the most famous people in history. Known for conquering most of what they knew as the world, Alexander accomplished a lot. From leadership, to tactics he used in battle, Alexander the Great was a successful man.
(Alexander The Not So Great 4) When he died, the people of his empire went into a 50 battle for control ultimately destroying the empire. Alexander was a villain because he was a terrible planner, he only cared about war, and he killed of any potential future leader from his kingdom. Some people say Alexander was a hero because he is great at conquering land. Alexander won many battles in the east by using his military genius resulting in capturing land for Greece. By the time Alexander was 30, he had conquered over 2,000,000 square miles of land spanning on 3
After his early death at the age of 33, Alexander left behind a vast empire stretching from Greece to northwestern India. In addition to his empire, however, Alexander also left a lasting impression on the world as a military leader and king. Even today Alexander remains a respected historical character, considering that his military strategies are still used in modern warfare. This paper thus attempts to answer the question what lasting impacts Alexander the Great had on future generations. In doing so this paper will examine three aspects of Alexander the Great: his personality, his military skills and, lastly, the resulting cultural impact of his conquests.
Napoleon also, was a skilled military leader and became the first emperor of France. Napoleon was a French leader whom quickly rose through the ranks of military during the French revolution and drove his military to expansion and change in the western world. Although they cannot be compared in every way because Napoleon twice relinquished his authority in military leadership, in which Alexander would not have even dreamt of doing. SECTION IV: Alexander the Great should be placed in a time capsule because of his outstanding and notable achievements of brilliant commands and undefeatable battles. He was young and clever with his battle tactics so that he could save the world from imperial enslavement.
Alexandria is considered to be the best example of ALexander's successful spreading of Greek Culture. Alexander may have been somewhat known as a big-headed, narcissistic leader, so much so as to going as far as to say that he was the son of Zeus, the King of the Gods. But Alexander truly did deserve the title of “The Great”. To be great in history is not to be a nice, sweet person who is kind to everyone, but to be a smart ruler who knows what he wants and gets what he wants. To be great in history is a title that comes with a lot of speculation, but
