The Dinner Between Hamilton Pros And Cons

558 Words3 Pages

Chapter 2: The Dinner June of 1790, Thomas Jefferson and Alexander Hamilton stood waiting outside Washington’s residence discussing Hamilton’s financial plan for the recovery of public credit, admitting that the government had halted it. Jefferson’s long time associate Madison was the one that was arguing that this financial plan would not be adopted, so in way of hoping to persuade Madison to consider it, Jefferson decided to host a dinner and invite them. Eventually, Hamilton convinced Madison not to dissuade his party members from supporting the financial plan. In return for this agreement, Hamilton agreed to influence the party members to locate the nations capital and they decided on the Potomac River, in order to impress Madison due to it being in favor of the south. Soon following this agreement, the House of Representatives passed the Assumption Bill and after partaking in passing the Residence Bill. The Assumption Bill didn’t go by Jefferson that well, him admitting to …show more content…

These petitions signaled for an end to the African slave trade, which astonished the House of Representatives. On the other side of this issue was Benjamin Franklin, an important figure at this time signing the opposing petition trying to abolish slavery. The House debated the question after the signing of the petition, which Franklin signed. All of this at the time led other leaders such as Scott and Jackson to debate this issue into further detail. Jackson argued for the idea of freedom for all men. The heat at this moment insisted that Northern delegates had no rights to decide the behavior of the South, whose slavery situation was different from their definition. Right at the end however, Benjamin Franklin stepped up and declared the House abolishes slavery, and Madison stepping up as well making sure that no Constitution would be passed involving this