A complex set of dialogue of languages is provided in The Tin Drum through a first-person narrator, where elements of the grotesque tale and myth, and the stories of the secondary characters are engaged in a serious dialogue with the patriarchal and orthodox states. Every concrete utterance of a speaking subject is a dialogized intersection of centrifugal and centripetal forces. Bakhtin considers it as “a contradiction-ridden, tension-filled unity of two embattled tendencies in the life of language” (Bakhtin271) The dwarfish Oskar Matzerath, the narrator and protagonist of the novel, grabs reader’s attention by the very first words of the novel: “Granted: I’m an inmate in a mental institution . . .” (Grass3). Utterances like this notoriously farce at the established norm of narrator’s …show more content…
Disappointed by the inability of Christianity to solve the human problems and the incapacity of Jesus, playing the drums (or the prophetic act of writing), decides Oskar to imagine a real Jesus by the other. The deliberate use of his very destructive voice, as well as his drum of tin and pestles. Thus the book Oscar, which is filled with two-voice remarks, describes a heteroglossia in which even the taboos and profanation of Christian orthodoxy come into play in order to reveal the totalitarianism and inadequacy of the longest systems of European thought and belief. A remarkable feature of the narrative Tin Drum, which contributes to the ambiguous and heterogeneous nature of his statements, the double character of his narrator expressed. As supported by Kasikhan: Kasikhan concludes that nature is expressing double Oskar Matzerath is a parody on the concept of Goethe 's two souls (two souls) who use the same forces of nature and reason, Because a single soul, the evil spirit is observed under the domination of the national at the