ipl-logo

The Ethicality Of Arizona Immigration Law

1376 Words6 Pages

We sometimes doubt if the U.S Constitution stands for what it says. It states that “All men are created equal” which means that everyone has the same rights, regardless of what sex, religion, race, or appearance. In our society, we have equal rights, case no one man has more than the other. In Arizona there was a legislative bill passed for Arizona Immigration Law otherwise known as SB 1070. The Arizona SB 1070 legislation is unethical because the “probable cause” stipulated in the law both protects and encourages racial profiling, and violates citizen’s rights and dignity.
SB 1070, which was passed in 2010 and signed by Governor Jan Brewer, stipulates that all illegal aliens over the age of 14 who remain in the United States for longer than …show more content…

With U.S. citizens who are suspected of being in the state illegally, they are then both arrested and detained until they have convinced or proved to law officials that they are citizens.
The U.S. Constitution was written to guard and defend our fundamental integrity as a nation. In aspects where it is very important for states to mandate their own policies, the Constitution protects state rights. However, in areas where it is critical that we safeguard the intrinsic freedoms of our citizens, the Constitution prohibits states from taking matters into their own …show more content…

In addition, it violates citizen’s rights and dignity in a manner that runs contrary to the founding principles of this nation. The Immigration law was put in place to lower the rate of illegal immigration but is ineffective and poorly designed, and will lead to long term conflict. It has had numerous negative side effects, hurting Arizona’s businesses, tourism, agriculture, education and population reduction over time causing the unemployment rate to rise tremendously. Arizona’s law is not and should not be the end of the discussion over how to resolve the issues plaguing our nation’s immigration system. Rather than imposing fifty different state immigration laws, U.S. Congress should collaborate to approve a national immigration reform policy that benefits our economy that is more realistic, and serves our nation’s long term

Show More
Related
800 Words | 4 Pages

This law helps prevent us from bringing in more illegal immigrants. With that being said, I agree with Phil Bryant’s Position on Illegal Immigration in

Read More
215 Words | 1 Pages

Dr. Barsha Pickell, The Arizona and the united states have similarities regarding the rights of individuals and term guidelines in how long a public official can stay in office. There is also accountability between each part of the government in each state. Moreover, regulations that citizens should adhere to regarding policies between the state and federal governments. The Arizona and United State constitution is similar by reason of gives the public right ahead of assimilate a decent life.

Read More
628 Words | 3 Pages

The government received rewards when they ruled that the person that was detained was a run away slave which led to many free black being faulsy accused and sold into bondage. Under the SB 1070 any citizen who gives a ride to an undocumented immigrant would be fined 1,000 dollars. It can be expected that many Latino’s would be shunned to because people would fear that they were undoumented. Finacial motivation also exist in SB 1070 because anti-immigrants citizens can sue official who do not enforce the new immigration law against the suspected alines. Since the official do not want to pay fines and attorney fees many Latino will be harrassed with arrests and be abused regarles of their legal status because they fear that they will be trargeted for litigation if they don’t take

Read More
900 Words | 4 Pages

Measures range from treating schools, courthouses and hospitals as “safe zones” to restricting the ability of local police to detain people on behalf of federal immigration. The law does nothing to curtail the ability of federal agents to come into the state and deport people or carry out raids, but it does make such actions more difficult for agencies with limited resources (Steinmetz,

Read More
803 Words | 4 Pages

Richard Seng Professor Franks AAS 33B May 1, 2016 California Propositions The three of the propositions that were passed in the 1990s were targeted towards the minority groups in California. Proposition 187 denied illegal immigrants from accessing public services, Proposition 209 which prohibited special treat towards a person due to their race and gender in public institutions, and Proposition 227 which changed the way that non-English speaking students were taught in public schools. These policies were legalized by voters, in order to alienate illegal immigrants and non-English speaking groups, so they can either fit in the American society, or just try and drive them out of the state completely. These ideological trends and anti-immigrant campaigns were designed by the right-wing Americans and the Republicans in the state of California, in the hopes of reducing the amount of immigrants in California.

Read More
536 Words | 3 Pages

The Arizona SB 1070 arguably may be one of the most controversial state immigration laws passed in Arizona. Arizona Governor Jan Brewer, Republican Party, signed the bill into a law on April 23, 2010. The bill implemented three key provisions: it permits people to sue their local government, agencies, cities, and counties if they believe that the immigration law is not actively being enforced. Second, it requires that police officers, when practicable, check the immigration status and detain those they deem suspicious as residing illegally in the United States. The final provision require an individual to possess their immigration documentation at all time.

Read More
515 Words | 3 Pages

The Puente Movement and Larkin & Lacey Frontera Fund Civil and Migrant Rights Crusades Arizona is home to many civil, human and migrant rights groups and advocates. The Phoenix based Puente Movement is one such organization. The movement advocates for migrant justice by empowering and educating communities to enable them defend their families and enhance their quality of life. The organization’s operating framework is built on the foundation of “Closed Fist, Open Hand strategy”. The Closed Fist strategy infers to fighting enforcement actions that criminalize people, though racial profiling, detention, Police-ICE collaboration and deportation.

Read More
1125 Words | 5 Pages

Municipalities do not have the right or jurisdiction to make decisions on immigration issues. Street-level bureaucrats must adhere to federal law. Currently there is no punishment or adverse consequences for cities that ignore this policy. Illegal immigration is an issue that has national and local effects, especially for a border city like San Diego. Representative Duncan Hunter (R-El Cajon) proposed H.R. 3009 – Enforce the Law for Sanctuary Cities Act.

Read More
922 Words | 4 Pages

Also known as the “Save Our State Initiative,” Proposition 187 was implemented due to a faltering economy as Californians were recovering from the recession of the early 1990s and were looking for ways to cut their state budget. Because the Latino, Hispanic, and Asian population increased dramatically, many blamed the immigrants and their use of state services for the economic turmoil. As a result, Californians established Proposition 187, which required all state and local officials to report the immigration status of people in the country illegally and “bars illegal aliens from the state's public education systems from kindergarten through university, and requires public educational institutions to begin verifying the legal status of both students and their parents... Public education is the most costly service used by illegal aliens in California--providing education for the estimated 300,000 to 400,000 illegal alien children in California schools accounts for about half of the estimated $3 billion annual costs of services provided to the estimated 1.7 million illegal aliens in California” (MN, par. 9). Proposition 187 caused undocumented immigrants to be ineligible for basic public benefits such as education, health, and social

Read More
1703 Words | 7 Pages

Annotated Bibliography Beadle, Amanda Peterson. " Top 10 Reasons Why The U.S. Needs Comprehensive Immigration Reform." ThinkProgress. © 2016 - Center for American Progress, 10 Dec. 2012.

Read More
948 Words | 4 Pages

Many do not understand the stringency attached to this subject nonetheless it does not change the fact that this law had adverse outcomes. Hence, the citizens of the United States should not be lab rats for the government to observe, and the charter that was set up by our founding fathers should not be tempted even if it is seen as

Read More
451 Words | 2 Pages

According to Lee and Dong (2012), in April 2010, the Arizona State Legislature enacted the Support Our Law Enforcement and Safe Neighborhoods Act (“S.B. 1070”), which establishes or amends state immigration offenses and defines local police officers’ immigration law enforcement authority where Section 1 of S.B. 1070 states that the Arizona legislature’s goal in enacting this statute was to deter illegal immigrants from entering the country and from engaging in economic activity (Retrieved from https://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/cert/11-182). Although the State of Arizona is frustrated with the problem with illegal aliens, it cannot take the matter over their own hands without going through the United States Supreme Court Decision to make it equal for all states not just one.

Read More
502 Words | 3 Pages

Obama’s Immigration Policy: Presidential Memos to order Deferred Action Within the last few years, immigration has been a huge topic for debate. Americans have seen a large increase in the numbers of immigrants, specifically illegal immigrants, over the last few decades. That has many citizens wondering what has changed. One of the most recent changes has to do with an executive policy known as deferred action.

Read More
1078 Words | 5 Pages

Undocumented immigrants live with fear of deportation every day of their lives. Those with control of state institutions who do not consider undocumented immigrants as worthy American residents in our society, take advantage of their power by instilling fear of deportation. The restrictive federal and state laws towards migration in the U.S. has become a way to keep undocumented immigrants and their families living in the shadows. Arrocha (2013) claims that the paradox of the U.S. migration seems be that our free democratic republicanism is viewed as the land of freedom, equality, and justice. Yet, these undocumented immigrants aren’t treated equally or given the freedom to live in our society without intimidation.

Read More
1020 Words | 5 Pages

This program was introduced by President Barack Obama in 2012 and was aimed at protecting people who were brought to the United States under the age of 16 from deportation. The program required applicants to be in or have graduated high school, to have no criminal record, and other requirements. It provided applicants who were eligible with a two-year, renewable permit, and although it granted work authorization, it did not grant legal status. Approximately 800,000 DACA recipients, also referred to as “Dreamers,” are currently being protected by the program. However, on September 5, 2017, the Trump administration announced that it would end DACA, declaring the executive order that created it unconstitutional.

Read More

More about The Ethicality Of Arizona Immigration Law

Related Topics

Open Document