Valerie Jimenez Professor Gilligan Government – 2306 25 September 2017 Texas and U.S Constitution There is no doubt that the Texas and United States Constitutions are important to keep democracy. Both constitutions contain similarities as well as some major differences. The first similarity would be the process of separation of powers. Separation of Powers was created by the “framers of the Constitution [who] feared too much centralized power” (PBS) and who knew that “the accumulation of all powers… in the same hands, whether of one, a few, or many…may justly be pronounced the very definition of tyranny” (PBS).
If you are to say that the United States and Texas Constitution are the same, then you would be extremely mistaken. Not to completely disagree with you, there are some same attributes in both constitutions,but the differences are written between those lines to. One of the similarities are that both have representative democratic government values which means that the government is ruled by trusted,elected officials chosen by the people. These appointed leaders are like a spokesperson, they were selected by the people so they fight for the people.
Does the First Amendment, Free Expression Clause, apply to the New York State law against Criminal Anarchy, depriving Giltow of his liberty of expression under the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment? Benjamin Gitlow, a member of the Socialist Party of America, advocated the overthrow of organized government by force, violence, and other unlawful means through his Left Wing Manifesto. He was arrested and charged with criminal Anarchy, “the policy that organized government should be overthrown by force or violence... or by any unlawful means. The advocacy of such doctrine either by word of mouth or writing is a felony”. Gitlow argued that the New York law was an unconstitutional limit forced by the state on the rights guaranteed
The 1st amendment is fundamental in a democracy, it gives each individual their opinion about a certain subject and gives the people the "power" to speak out when they find something wrong. For example, they can speak what they find wrong with our Representatives, without the retaliation or censorship of the government. You might think that you can go down the street and say whatever you like without anybody telling you can't. Hold your horse right there be aware that you can say what you want but there is certain things that the 1st amendment doesn't cover. The Supreme Court has some cases where it decided where the 1st amendment was appropriate and where it wasn't.
Truly, it implied forbidding state-supported chapels, for example, the Church of England. The Supreme Court also translates the degree of the assurance stood to these rights. The First Amendment has been deciphered by the Court as applying to the whole government despite the fact that it is just explicitly relevant to Congress. However, the Court has deciphered, the due procedure provision of the Fourteenth Amendment as securing the rights in the First Amendment from obstruction by state governments. See U.S. Constitution.
To protect the “unalienable rights (of) life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness” and ultimately the freedom of expression, the First Amendment prevents congress from restricting religion or the “freedom of speech, or of the press or the right of the people to assemble peaceably” in order to . Most importantly what the First Amendment allows is the right of the people to “petition the Government for a redress of grievances”, which allows the American people to “abolish…and to institute a new government, laying its foundation on…principles…most likely to effect their safety and happiness”, exactly as the Continental Congress did with the Declaration of
First Amendment rights are guaranteed to all American citizens, but current free speech issues are testing Constitutional boundaries. Where must the line be drawn between free speech and infringement upon others’ rights? Is there some speech so cruel and so appalling that it does not merit protection? These issues have been raised by the recent activities of the Westboro Baptist Church. Based out of Topeka, Kansas[1], this small group of radicals is marked by their hateful views and their contempt for homosexuality. The Westboro Baptist Church has gained notoriety and sparked national outrage with their offensive acts, particularly by protesting the funerals of fallen soldiers.
The first Amendment grants freedom concerning, religion, assembly, expression and the right to petition. These clauses are very satisfactory for the people of America. They cannot be taken away from the government or anyone else. However, if they are misused the government has the right to intrude. This essay will discuss the five clauses in the 1st amendment.
In the bill of rights a very important issue was addressed which is freedom of religion, press, speech, and assembly. United States of America’s citizen can practice any religion they believe. In concussion federalist were more concern about the common good and anti-federalist were more concern about the individual
The First Amendment states many of the freedoms a US citizen posses, banning/censorship of books however has violated this idea of freedom. Some authors dislike the idea of censorship of books, such as Ellen Hopkins. Hopkins is a successful writer who wrote a bestselling book called, Crank. She also wrote the poem Manifesto which was adopted as the official manifesto of the American Library Association banned books week back in 2009. Crank was a book that was banned and censored, which Hopkins disliked.
The First Amendment is about freedom of speech and religion. It allows people to speak what they want and say what they think is right, the choice of God they want to believe in and practice that religion. Some other countries do not have the freedom for people who wants to express themselves and they were force to believe in the God that their leader wants. For example, in Vietnam, no one has a right to say anything about the government, especially anything about Ho Chi Minh who was the leader of the North Vietnam during Vietnam War, even any
The Importance of the 1st Amendment In 1787 our founding fathers assembled the constitution of the United States of America. Of this which contains the most important document to the American citizen, the Bill of rights. The first Amendment states: “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances” These freedoms granted by the Bill of Rights are often known as freedom of expression. These rights are most important to a truly free society. The first amendment provides us with new ideas and dismisses the fear of punishment
Based on the first amendment which states that “Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress of grievances.”. We the citizens of the United States have the freedom to choose and practice our religion, freedom of speech, freedom of press and freedom of petition. Although this amendment seems to be beneficial for the general public it actually does more harm than good. I do not believe that there is in fact a such thing as freedom. Freedom means the power to act, speak or think as one warns without hindrance or restraint.
Chapter 4 of the book We the People talks about Civil Liberties, this chapter mainly talks about the Rights that were placed in the Constitution (not in the Bill of Rights), it also talks about the Bill of Rights and it describes the rights protected by the Bill of Rights. It also talks about specific rights that work close together with the Bill of Rights and Amendments rights. One of the first Amendments that is described in great detail is Freedom of Speech and Religion. The first Amendment protects US citizens right to talk about almost any topic in the United States. I said almost any topic because there are some forms of speech that aren’t protected by the First Amendment (these forms of speech can be limited or prohibited), some of the forms of speech that aren’t protected by the First Amendment are Fighting Words and Hate Speech, Student Speech, Libel and Slander speech.
There are many views and opinions of the state of the United States on this subject. It has long been a puzzling issue that never seems to seize. America should have religious freedom, because it is a constitutional right to Americans. Prayer in school, gay marriage, and governmental control, are among some of the main issues in this topic.
