Whether laws intend to limit the offensive power of a minority or protect a minority from attacks, either way rights are lost. In the words of Roger Baldwin, founder of the civil liberties union, “In order to defend the people you like, you have to defend the people you hate.” Roger Baldwin’s statement indicates that if we limit the free speech of one group we ultimately limit our own freedoms. The first Amendment clearly states the limiting of any groups right is unconstitutional, “make no law … abridging the freedom of speech.” The basis behind not allowing the government to define free speech allows Americans to create their own social order and among themselves determine what is acceptable.
Without freedom of the press discussions cannot reach a wider audience, debate is obstructed,
Freedom of speech is a right that was given to Americans some time ago. It is the most cherished right Americans have. People would not be able to express themselves without it. They would not be the same person without it. In Fahrenheit 451 by Ray Bradbur, the lack of speech was protrayed through the characteristics of Guy Montags job as a Fireman and their society and government.
Censorship in F451 is a massive deal because
Could you imagine just scrolling through your phone one day and finding a news article saying that musicals have been censored and banned? Or flip flops? It would be very bizarre to have to go through life after experencing something that was now censored. What is even more weird is the affect it could have on the world though. It is strange to think about how such a small, normal thing could be taken away and have a massive affect on how the world works.
It might take away a person’s ability to speak freely, or keep some books from being written. They wanted people’s rights
Some may disagree but censorship is used to protect free thought. It prevents private information/knowledge getting to the wrong people like allies. Censorship protects the morals of society and their people. Those who are anti-censorship prevents the progression and development of society. Freedom of speech, which is our first amendment as humans in the United States, is endangered when anti-censorship is present.
When Bradbury wrote about the danger of censorship, the world may have been already been being censored with the events of World War II. If there was already censorship then and increasing, he had a lot to worry about for the U.S.’s future. Censorship is bad now, and it is only getting worse, which can make citizens rebel against it’s government and against the site where information may be getting censored. According to usnew.com, authorities will almost certainly have to step in, just as they did when credit bureaus were regulated in 1970 (Epstein). This states that this problem has been happening for a long time, prior to the 70’s, which as time will prove, its just gotten worse over time.
Despite the fact that censorship might never reach the level it has in Fahrenheit 451, it very well has already overtaken various media outlets such as television, internet videos, news articles, and books. One good example of censorship in modern times is on the YouTube platform itself. In October of 2015, a content
The article argues that the courts should only view harmful speech in the same eyes and rule them the same as if they were conduct harms. The source then discusses how many scholars believe that freedom of speech only applies when the benefits outweigh the harms, regarding what is being said. The article does a good job of approaching the problem through a semi-neutral lens. The article clearly lets its opinion be known at times; however, it approaches the opposite side of the argument in a fair manner. The article will be incredibly beneficial because it discusses when freedom of speech should not apply with a neutral approach.
Censorship can be very harmful to society but it also has the power to save it from creating negative
Our own country is basically threatening ourselves from the freedom of speech and should encourage everyone to express themselves without punishment. This is not necessarily an issue that can be resolved, but it needs to be made publicized and be made aware of. Too much of society are triggered by a simple few words they may come across when scrolling a timeline. Social media is an influential and high powered tool that’s forced a new lifestyle. We must make ourselves and others comfortable with expressing themselves while handling criticism to ensure protection of our freedom of
Is there negative and positive sides? History: The belief in the right to free speech is older than we believe it is. It actually goes back to the ancient Greeks (Antiquity).
Starting with pro, I believe that freedom of speech allows people to enable the right to express about personal thoughts, such as expressing your personal opinion on a political debate, or expressing your opinion in a public or campus riot. According to Visionlaunch.com, they state that “this concept allows a person to have the freedom of expressing their public opinion and their thoughts, without the worry of getting fines or jail time even if people don’t agree with you”. How would this impact or affect the people around the world? Well, this would not impact anybody because expressing your opinion on a
George Washington once said,"the freedom of Speech may be taken away—and, dumb & silent we may be led, like sheep, to the Slaughter.” This shows that if freedom is taken away, specifically freedom of speech, the people will feel lost and confused in their country. They would feel as if the did not have a say in the countries
