Fire: “the phenomenon of combustion manifested in light, flame, and heat” (“Fire Definition & Meaning”). Most people are afraid of fire, and they have a right to be. It is extremely hot and it can burn anything, but in Fahrenheit 451 by Ray Bradbury, fire consumes two main things: books and knowledge. In Fahrenheit 451, Guy Montag’s occupation is a Firemen, but he isn’t stopping the fires along with his boss, Captain Beatty, he is starting them, and is focusing the fires on books. Montag loves to burn, but when his new neighbor, Clarisse McCellan moves in, he starts to get a new perspective on his life, his society, and his job. But things change a lot more when Montag is forced to burn down another house, but this time the house owner is …show more content…
When Bradbury wrote about the danger of censorship, the world may have been already been being censored with the events of World War II. If there was already censorship then and increasing, he had a lot to worry about for the U.S.’s future. Censorship is bad now, and it is only getting worse, which can make citizens rebel against it’s government and against the site where information may be getting censored. According to usnew.com, authorities will almost certainly have to step in, just as they did when credit bureaus were regulated in 1970 (Epstein). This states that this problem has been happening for a long time, prior to the 70’s, which as time will prove, its just gotten worse over time. If the government censors more and more, this could lead to war, secret deals that could jeprodize our freedom, and complete government takeover. During COVID, for example, if anything negative was said about the COVID-19 vaccine, they were immediately censored on Twitter, and this evidence is on the “twitter files.” Besides the constant cons to censorship, the people may rebel if censorship continues to get worse and worse. If the government is censoring things, shame can land on people that could have helped us get to a better place than where humans are right now. Usnews also said that “the alternative would be to allow a large corporation to wield an