ipl-logo

The Ford Pinto Case

1427 Words6 Pages

In engineering, several ethical theories are utilized in order to distinguish ethical actions from unethical ones. These theories include duty ethics, rights ethics, virtue ethics, and utilitarianism. While each of these theories focuses on different aspects of moral behavior, they all are based upon the idea that people need to abide by an ethical code of conduct. When examining an engineering case such as the Ford Pinto Case, it can be demonstrated how each ethical theory is applied in practice and how, in many cases, utilitarianism is superior to the other ethical theories.
In 1971, Ford President Lee Iacocca instructed his workers to create a new car with specific restrictions; each car had to weigh no more than 2000 pounds and cost no …show more content…

Duty ethics, a theory founded by Immanuel Kant, is based upon principles that focus on the intentions of one’s actions rather than the outcome. It was founded upon the idea that each individual has a hierarchy of duties and obligations that should not and cannot be broken regardless of the circumstances. Ford’s duty was to create a car that was in accordance with all standards imposed by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration. The Pinto complied with NHTSA standards, and Ford did not have any obligation to make the car any safer than the law required. Ford had no intention of causing so many deaths. They only aimed to create a car that adhered to all required safety standards. Thus, it can be argued that when analyzing this case from the duty ethics perspective, Ford did everything correctly, and the tragic outcome was a result of …show more content…

Ford demonstrated an abuse of utilitarianism; the decision not to repair faults represented a denial of doing no harm and of the rights to life and safety. Utilitarianism also does not allow for placing a value on human suffering, which Ford did. In considering that the ends justify the means, quantity and not ‘who' suffers has significance, as it is “the greatest number for the greatest good”. Utilitarianism is superior to the other ethical theories because it gives a different perspective that, if strictly followed in this case, would have prevented the loss of millions of lives. When applied in theory, the comparison of good and bad consequences provides a method of ensuring that companies consider the ethical reasoning of their actions. This helps to suggest that utilitarianism can positively influence ethical business practices as long as the principles are not abused and true costs can be accurately

Show More
Related
1593 Words | 7 Pages

Ethical decisions are made every day in these industries. The question becomes, what is more important: making energy, making money, or a safe environment? In these two cases it

Read More
1252 Words | 6 Pages

113-122. 717–746, https://doi.org/10.5840/soctheorpract2021922140. “University of Pittsburgh Swanson School of Engineering What Is Ethics.” SSoE Home, www.engineering.pitt.edu/subsites/projects/engineering-ethics/what-is-ethics/. Accessed 29 Apr. 2024. The. “Utilitarianism.”

Read More
1755 Words | 8 Pages

This approach focuses on the maximum benefit of everyone, disregarding whether or not they were derived from lies and deception. This approach would be the most appropriate when assessing a solution to this problem. The process of Utilitarian also helps to explain the assessing of this solution. First the approach says identify the possible solutions, we then look at the benefits and harms of each possible outcome, and last we choose a course of action that provides the most benefit for the overall group. The two groups of Utilitarians also help to lay out this case.

Read More
1217 Words | 5 Pages

Utilitarianism is the moral theory that the action that people should take it the one that provides the greatest utility. In this paper I intend to argue that utilitarianism is generally untenable because act and rule utilitarianism both have objections that prove they cannot fully provide the sure answer on how to make moral decisions and what will be the ultimate outcome. I intend to do this by defining the argument for act and rule utilitarianism, giving an example, presenting the objections to act and rule utilitarianism and proving that utilitarianism is untenable. Both act and rule utilitarianism attempt to argue that what is right or wrong can be proven by what morally increases the well being of people. Act utilitarianism argues that

Read More
1360 Words | 6 Pages

The concept of ethics entails systemizing, justifying, and recommending right and wrong conduct. It involves in practical reasoning: good, right, duty, obligation, virtue, freedom, rationality, and choice. Humanity has questioned this concept of ethics and ‘good’ for as long as it has survived, as it deals with real-life issues such as “what is morally right and wrong?” and “how do people ought to act?”

Read More
611 Words | 3 Pages

The third and final ethical examination this paper will make is that of John Stuart Mill and utilitarianism. Book definitions can be somewhat confusing on this. The basic idea behind utilitarianism is the right or wrong of an action is determined by the level of happiness or unhappiness it brings about. The only desirable ends in life are pleasure and freedom from pain. For something to be desirable it is either inherently pleasurable or is a means to promote pleasure and will keep pain from happening.

Read More
1218 Words | 5 Pages

The divine command theory, utilitarianism, Kant’s duty defined morality, natural law theory, and Aristotle’s virtue ethics are the five types of ethical theories. The divine command theory states that what is morally right and wrong will be decided by God. Utilitarianism states that “Action “A” is morally right if and only if it produces the greatest amount of overall happiness. Kant’s duty defined morality states that what is important is acting for the sake of producing good consequences, no matter what the act is. Natural law theory states that people should focus on the good and avoid any evil.

Read More
1225 Words | 5 Pages

To use preference utilitarianism to make ethical decisions, would require us to look at and weigh the preferences of all of these beings involved in the situation, not just our own personal interests. However,

Read More
683 Words | 3 Pages

Immanuel Kant was a German Philosopher who is responsible for developing Kantian Ethics. According to CSUS’ website page states, “Kant’s Theory is an example of a deontological moral theory-according to these theories, the rightness or wrongness of actions does not depend on their consequences but on whether they fulfill or duty. (“Kantian Ethics”, n.d.). Kant believed that people’s morals are based off from good will to fulfill are duties, and not based on the consequences of our actions. When it comes to Kantian Ethics, how does it affect one of the cases involving Ford fixing the vehicle they created in the 1970s called the Pinto.

Read More
1245 Words | 5 Pages

In which, utilitarianism introduces the idea that “one should maximize pleasure and minimize pain for all parties involves in a decision” (Leib slide 12). To summarize, this concept states that there should be “the greatest amount of happiness for the greatest number of people” (Palmer 273). This philosophical view makes the most sense in today’s society by eliminating things that cause pain away from

Read More
1711 Words | 7 Pages

Commonly, ethical systems are categorized into two major systems. The deontological approaches or normative ethical position which judges an action based on the adherence of the action to certain rules and the teleological approaches which judges primarily based on the consequences of an action (Hare, 1964). The Utilitarianism is assigned to the teleological approaches, as it does not evaluate an action by itself but by it’s

Read More
1228 Words | 5 Pages

As it has been shown, the utilitarian view has its strengths and is certainly logical in some cases, however, Kantian ethics offer a more stable set of moral

Read More
1515 Words | 7 Pages

Decisions about right and wrong fill each and every day. Turmoil exists due to deciding if Deontology, where one acts based on the right motives, or if Utilitarianism, where one should act in a way that would produce the best results and consequences, should govern decisions and their morality. However, I believe Deontology, which is reason and duty based, serves as the superior way to dictate morality. In this paper, I will explain both the principles of Deontology and Utilitarianism, discuss the superior aspects of Deontology as compared to Utilitarianism, as well as grapple with objections to Deontology. While both ethical frameworks contain parts of ideologies that could be seen as valid, Kant’s theory on Deontology holistically remains

Read More
1685 Words | 7 Pages

However, this is much more complex than the seemingly practical to use act utilitarianism. Assigning different ‘levels’ to different pleasures and pains can take up a considerable amount of time, when sometimes a quick decision is necessary. Furthermore, with both act and rule utilitarianism, the pleasure and pain of every potential situation must be calculated to decide the most moral course of action. However, it is impossible for one person, or even a group of people, to perfectly calculate every potential outcome – many situations will have extremely different consequences to what was originally predicted. Moreover, especially in larger companies, it is hard to measure far-reaching

Read More
1492 Words | 6 Pages

[6] Ford knew about the questionable design for the Pinto but still went ahead with the product and put public safety aside. Ford had analyzed that they could have saved lives by using a new design stated in this text: “the new design would result in 180 less deaths” [6] Ford decided that “the cost would have been $137 million versus the $49.5 million price tag put on the deaths, injuries, and car damages, and thus Ford felt justified not implementing the design change. “ [6] Ford in this case of the Pinto design did not follow the code of ethics and due to this it led to the deaths of other people. These are the implications that could happen if an engineer does not put the public safety and welfare first, which is why engineers are obligated to follow rules and keep public

Read More

More about The Ford Pinto Case

Related Topics

Open Document