ipl-logo

The Four Dissentinions Of Obergefell

1781 Words8 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Bibliography of homosexual marriage

The four dissenting opinions in Obergefell give us a fairly good idea of what a majority opinion would look like if issued by a Supreme Court that still hears and orders its thinking based on foundationalism, objective truth and ordered reason. In other words, what the Obergefell decision would look like if written by justices who still hear the echo. It might look something like this:
Marriage, as historically defined in our law and traditions since the founding of this nation and for all of recorded human history, has been understood by the people and supported by the laws of the States as a union between a man and a woman. Even in those cultures which allow polygamous marriage, the heterosexual character of the institution is assumed. Western …show more content…

Therefore, a society has good cause to favor the institution of marriage through appropriate laws establishing and regulating civil marriage so that children, for the most part, are conceived, educated, nurtured and protected by their biological parents. The fact that some married couples are childless or that some children are orphaned or abandoned and must be raised by others does not alter the normalcy or centrality of the nuclear family unit or its importance to the State.
Civil marriage is not a fundamental right of all citizens regardless of gender. Civil marriage other than between a husband and a wife has no historical or legal roots beyond the last few decades. Civil marriage, as a legal institution, does not exist to confer human dignity or give societal approval to the personal love and commitment between two individuals. It is beyond the power and purpose of government to confer such things on its citizens. Personal love and happiness are wonderful things, but they are none of the government’s …show more content…

There is no fundamental constitutional right for two people of the same gender to participate in civil marriage. Civil marriage laws have a clear rational basis as a gender specific institution and serve a legitimate governmental purpose. There is no violation of due process involved when the legal institution of civil marriage reflects the social institution of marriage as it has always been defined for understandable and rational reasons.
The notion that marriage is a discriminatory institution designed to subjugate women is unfounded as a matter of law and seems historically unfounded. While it is true that, before the present age of gender equality, under the law wives usually enjoyed fewer and more limited legal rights than husbands, However, this ignores the substantial legal obligations placed on a husband regarding his wife and the children born to the marriage that only exist because those obligations were imposed by civil marriage

Show More
Related
646 Words | 3 Pages

Obergefell v. Hodges is one of the most important Supreme Court rulings to date. This case, by a 5-4 decision, legalized same-sex marriage and established that the 14th amendment, by both the Due Process Clause and Equal Protections Clause, guarantees this right. The Supreme Court for a long time exercised judicial modesty in terms of cases involving same sex marriage by allowing the decisions to be made by the states. However, with some states recognizing same-sex marriages and others not, things began to get complicated when couples would move to other states and not get the same benefits as married couples and other similar situations that caused issues. However, when the Supreme Court took this case and ruled that same-sex marriage was legal in all 50 states, it was a prime example of the court using judicial activism.

Read More
409 Words | 2 Pages

Obergefell v. Hodges (2014) The Obergefell v. Hodges (2014) case involved the marriage of same sex couples. Groups of same sex couples sued their state agencies to challenge the constitutionality of them refusing to recognize legal same sex marriages. Plaintiffs argued that the states’ statutes violated the Equal Protection Clause and Due Process Clause of the 14th Amendment.

Read More
677 Words | 3 Pages

This paper focuses on the Supreme Court case Obergefell v. Hodges (2015). This paper will give an overview of the case, the major arguments made by the plaitiffs and the defendents, as well as how the case has affected other rulings. This case has answered many legal questions and will shape any future cases that deal with gay marriage, possibly even equal rights. Deatiled CH: James Obergefell and John Arthur was a same-sex couple and was married on July 11, 2013 on a medical transport plan on the tarmac at the airport in Baltimore, Maryland due to Arthur being unable to move (3,2) .

Read More
2162 Words | 9 Pages

In the majority opinion written on the Obergefell et al. v. Hodges Supreme Court case on June 26, 2015, the court decided that states were required to issue marriage licenses to same-sex couples as well as recognize such licenses from other states on the basis of the Fourteenth Amendment. This decision held wide ramifications for policy implementation throughout the nation, especially in those states that had not already legalized same-sex marriage. This unilateral action by the federal government created a complicated responsibility for state and local governments to integrate the broad new legal proceedings effectively. The problems that arise in the local governments following such federal decisions challenge the nation’s federalist system,

Read More
478 Words | 2 Pages

Obergefell v Hodges 2015 Obergefell v Hodges (2015) is a landmark 5 to 4 decision in favor of legalizing gay marriage. James Obergefell petitioned the state 's ban on same sex marriage. He argued that it is a fundamental guaranteed under the Due Process Clause and Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.

Read More
726 Words | 3 Pages

What the law will do is to make wife criminally reliable for the support of her husband, just as husband criminally reliable for the support of his wife.” By providing the case of how the equal rights amendment operate in another state, it definitely proves that the Equal Rights Amendment would take away the right that the women currently have, husband’s obligation to support his wife and household. Women have to earn and spend all of their money to support their children rather than using the husband’s support. Women already have the important duties in the household, such as cleaning the room, cooking the dinner, and spending time with children so having the ERA may

Read More
731 Words | 3 Pages

Throughout American history, minorities have been discriminated against for numerous things relating to race, gender, religion, etc. One group that was discriminated around the time of the Civil War were the Blacks. Throughout American history, they were thought of as inferior to whites and treated like animals. After the Civil War, laws started to change in favor of Blacks, things like making it illegal to enslave them, making them citizens and giving them the right to vote. These laws didn’t eliminate discrimination, though, and failed to change the opinion of what most thought of the Blacks.

Read More
2137 Words | 9 Pages

Hodges (2015) the Supreme Court held that the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment guarantees the right to marry as one of the fundamental liberties it protects, applying to same-sex couples the same as opposite-sex couples. This case was brought forward by numerous groups of same-sex couples who were suing their relevant state agencies to challenge the constitutionality of those states’ same-sex marriage laws. The Supreme Court found that there is no difference between same-sex marriages and opposite-sex marriages, therefore, the exclusion of same-sex couples from the right to marry violates the Due Process Clause. This is policy making because the Supreme Court forced states to change their laws by deciding that it was against the constitution to not only ban the recognition of same-sex marriages that occurred in states that allowed it, but also making same-sex marriage legal in all states. Government officials even those who do not believe in the law change must abide by it, by allowing same-sex couples their now legal right to be married and receive the benefits that opposite-sex married couples receive; changing the way that citizens and the government interact in societal ways but also financial

Read More
278 Words | 2 Pages

When the court examined America’s history, they concluded that American antisodomy laws have not been enforced and did not single out homosexual couples until the 20th century. The court

Read More
685 Words | 3 Pages

Hodges”). They emphasized that denying same-sex couples the right to marry was a form of discrimination. The opponents argued that the definition of marriage as between one man and one woman was rooted in tradition and that it should be upheld. They also believe that the power should be left to the states to decide and that the Constitution doesn’t recognize same-sex marriage. At the end of the case Obergefell v. Hodges on June 26, 2015, the Supreme Court of the United States held in a 5-4 decision that the bans “on same-sex marriage and on recognizing same sex marriages duly performed in other jurisdictions are unconstitutional under the Due Process and Equal Protection clauses of the Fourteenth Amendment to the United States Constitution” (“Obergefell V. Hodges”).

Read More
1810 Words | 8 Pages

But, as with its Commerce Clause jurisprudence, the Court’s expansive rights jurisprudence may not be taken for granted. Consider the 2015 Obergefell v. Hodges case, which legalized same-sex marriage in all states. That decision, undeniably, was an audacious assertion of power by the Supreme Court, one that brought the guillotine down on states’ internal deliberations as to the merits of same-sex marriage. I thus cannot deny that this decision counts in favor of the view that the Court holds a bias toward centralization, but there is another side to this coin, namely, the four impassioned dissenting opinions delivered by the Court. The principal dissent among these decried the Court for “invalidat[ing] the marriage laws of more than half the States” without their assent.

Read More
911 Words | 4 Pages

The federal judge in San Antonio, Texas, “ruled that Texas ' ban on same-sex marriage violates the U.S. Constitution and demeans the dignity of gay couples "for no legitimate reason." Judge Orlando Garcia then granted two plaintiff couples ' request for an injunction barring the state from enforcing the ban.” (Keen 1) One of the couples sought to be married in Texas while the other couple had already been married in Massachusetts, but desired to be recognized by the state of Texas. In Garcia’s ruling, he states that, “the Texas bans violate the guarantees of due process and equal protection of the U.S. Constitution.”

Read More
1027 Words | 5 Pages

Liberals support same-sex marriage and argue that love is grounds enough for marriage, regardless of sexual orientation. Conservatives are usually opposed and often cite religious viewpoints and concerns about the reading of children as the main reasons for their opposition. In the 1970s the court case Baker v. Nelson occurred. It was a case in which the Minnesota Supreme Court ruled that a state law limiting marriage to persons of the opposite sex did not violate the U.S. Constitution. On June 26, 2015 the United States Supreme Court legalized same-sex marriage in all 50 states.

Read More
350 Words | 2 Pages

Marriage strengthens the family bond, especially when a child is being born into the family. Like the saying goes, “it takes a village to raise a child.” The point mentioned in the video was marriage without consent would only lead to undesirable consequences. If one has decided to settle down with the partner of choice, it is without a doubt that the family will have a say regarding the marriage. One must ensure to be competent in taking care of the partner of choice as the family entrusts the responsibility to the individual.

Read More
1412 Words | 6 Pages

Marriage is an important institution in a society and although there have been changes in the trend of marriage pattern, it is still very clear that marriage still matters. Marriage exists and its main aim is to bring two people together to form a union, where a man and a woman leave their families and join together to become one where they often start their own family. Sociologists are mostly interested in the relationship between marriage and family as they form the key structures in a society. The key interest on the correlation between marriage and family is because marriages are historically regarded as the institutions that create a family while families are on the other hand the very basic unit upon which our societies are founded on.

Read More

More about The Four Dissentinions Of Obergefell

Related Topics

Open Document