ipl-logo

Tobacco Advertising Case Study

829 Words4 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Why tobacco advertising should not be banned

1. In favor of ban on tobacco advertising:

The ban of tobacco advertising is justified because it is the moral responsibility of the government to protect the welfare of its citizens as tobacco is known to cause serious health issues and death. The number of deaths due to illnesses caused by tobacco has been exponentially rising. According to WHO, there were 4,023 deaths in 1998 and the number is estimated to rise to 8.4 million deaths in 2020 and 10 million in 2030. Advertising should also be banned so as not to influence the youth to start smoking. The ban was not something new because there were international precedents. Countries like France, Finland and Norway had already implemented similar bans. The government had the right …show more content…

Opposition to the ban of tobacco advertising in India
Banning tobacco advertising was infringing on the people’s rights of choice and advocates of free choice stated that this amounted to unnecessary intrusion by the state in the private lives of its citizens. Incidentally, the organized sector which mainly produced tobacco products accounted for only 16% of the market share while 84% comprised of other products like 'beedi, ' and 'ghutkas so the ban would have a negligible impact on the overall sales. Also if the government already legalized the production of tobacco products, it should be legal to advertise the same.
Another negative impact was that the ban would reduce the awareness of consumers to distinguish between products of differing quality and would slow down the progression of consumer up the scale from harmful tobacco consumption (like ghutka, zarda etc) to more refined forms. The ban would lead to a surge in surrogate advertising which could defeat the purpose of the action. It was not wise to mess with the tobacco Industry as it was a major contributor to the State Exchequer, (In the Year 2000-01 it contributed about Rs. 8000 crores in excise revenue) which was extremely important, given the financial crunch which the government …show more content…

As well as imposing a ban on tobacco advertising, India needed to ban foreign media, TV and magazines found locally that carried tobacco advertisements; for instance Marlboro Formula I which was very popular with the affluent youth.
One more study to reinforce the benefits of tobacco banning was conducted in 1992 by the Department of Health (DOH), which UK reviewed various forms of evidence to assess whether tobacco advertising affected the aggregate demand for tobacco products in Norway, Finland, Canada and New Zealand. In each case, the banning of advertising was followed by a fall in smoking. In 1997, in a similar study for the International Union against Cancer, the available data in the same four countries was examined. It was found that per capita consumption of cigarettes (15 years +) had dropped between 14 and 37 % after the implementation of the

Show More
Related
1009 Words | 5 Pages

First, because they may feel attacked and invaded by the ad. Second, because most of the time the smokers already know how harmful cigarettes can be but they do not care and they are already tired of see those anti-smoking

Read More
734 Words | 3 Pages

In the year 1600, tobacco spread all through the United States and in the nations around it. To the people in America, tobacco smoking was taken as a tradition which they all had adopted. By the year 1604, James I the king of England, opposed tobacco smoking, saying that it would cause wild behaviors to the people. By then, tobacco smoking had become a habit for most of the people in England and they begged to be allowed to continue doing it. In the year 1612, tobacco was planted not only to be consumed now but also as a cash crop.

Read More
263 Words | 2 Pages

Andy Tan is one three authors of this journal. He works for Harvard University School of Health and has been featured around the world for his research in public health. The finished work was then published to Elsevier. Elsevier is a world leading provider in information for healthcare providers. This journal is very famous and prestigious.

Read More
776 Words | 4 Pages

Smoking cigarettes doesn’t only have an effect on the one who smokes however additionally the people around them. I feel that smoking should not be legalized in the United States, even if this is an unacceptable issue to the majority of people in the country. There are smoking bans that were enforced in early years to insure the protection of the people in businesses, and eating place

Read More
712 Words | 3 Pages

Cigarettes should not be banned in Canada. Everyone has seen the ancient government infomercial made in the early 2000’s aimed to steer children and teens away from taking cigarettes. They have had some effect to the new generation according to Statistics Canada with the percentage of Canadians smoking declining from 21% to 18% over the last 5 year. This study also shows that the majority of smokers are in their 40s.

Read More
1087 Words | 5 Pages

Their individual right to free speech, however, is not as important as the common good. Legislation has passed on this same premise previously. The Public Health Cigarette Smoking Act prohibits tobacco products to be advertised on television due to the public health concern caused by tobacco. This relates to the common good because of the public health concern. The Supreme Court has shown that public health and the common good trump the individual right to free speech in cases like this.

Read More
160 Words | 1 Pages

Tobacco-free kids Association Created in 1996, the Campaign for Tobacco-Free Kids is a 501(c) (3) non-profit organization in Washington, Dc which is a leading force in the fight to reduce tobacco use and its deadly toll in the United States and around the world. Their mission is “A future free death and disease caused by tobacco. They save lives by advocating the national, state or local level proven public policies that prevent kids from smoking, help smokers to quit and protect everyone from second-hand smoking. A2.

Read More
195 Words | 1 Pages

Tinkler argues cigarette advertisements aimed at women were preoccupied with establishing smoking as a feminine practice. In the 1930s, smoking was utilised to signify that women were “modern”. One brand specifically aimed at the female market used the strapline ‘Red Tips for Red Lips’ a marketing notion that the inclusion of a red tip prevented lipstick marking the cigarette and thus enabled men to ‘preserve their beautiful illusions….’ . In promoting their products to women the aim was to create a notion that smoking was a practice that appealed to modern, fashionable, successful, middle-class femininity. However, despite gift-wrapping cigarettes as an embellishment to the female persona smoking was perceived as causing soreness to the

Read More
1059 Words | 5 Pages

A daily basis of only adults smoking could change and evolve into the whole population, from all ages, getting into that unhealthy habit. It’s undeniable that some things placed by the government are actually helpful, especially the age limits. They often state that being able to express themselves in any way possible should be considered. This could cause an uproar within the world population. If teens are getting what they want, then so should everyone, by all means lets legalise drugs and weapons and we’ll see what a great time everyone is having when families, schools and governments are effected as well as countries.

Read More
723 Words | 3 Pages

Recently, there is a new invention that has become public interest from country’s leader to citizen due to the rise of one device that called e-cigarettes. E-cigarettes or Vape are electronic devices intended to deliver nicotine with flavorings, which up to 7700 different flavors and some other chemicals into vapor. The amount of users of this device has increased in the past couple of years, which contributed $6 billion to the economy in 2015 itself, this is so as it is often portrayed as a healthier substitute for the regular cigarettes though this statement has yet been proven true. The question is: should the government ban the use of e-cigarettes? In my opinion, government should ban the use of e-cigarettes because it is detrimental to health,

Read More
1276 Words | 6 Pages

Specific Purpose Statement: To invite my audience to consider the advantages and disadvantages of smoking cigarettes so that they can make an informed decision on whether or not to smoke them Thesis: There are two obvious stances on cigarettes: pro-cigarette and anti-cigarette. Today I would like to explore these two stances and have a discussion about your current views. Introduction:

Read More
964 Words | 4 Pages

Smoking is a choice and no one is forcing that upon people. The public has been well warned about the risks of smoking; therefore, the people smoking are fully aware that their lives are at risk. Tobacco companies should not be held responsible for smoking-related illnesses and deaths because once people put the tobacco in their mouths, they are putting there own life at risk themselves, and because as individuals we have a choice on whether or not to smoke cigarette. It 's true that tobacco companies aren 't accountable for why people smoke. Nonetheless, every tobacco product has a warning label on it therefore it 's not the companies responsibility from smoking-related illnesses and deaths.

Read More
849 Words | 4 Pages

There is grey disgusting cancerous smoke through the air you and your loved ones breathe. I believe that smoking cigarettes in public places should be illegal for many reasons such as the health and safety dangers of others and even myself. Firstly those who believe that smoking should be banned say that cigarettes can affect smokers deeply in the long run. “Over 50,000 studies of the health effects of tobacco in dozens of countries have detailed its dangers.

Read More
708 Words | 3 Pages

The Supreme court banned smoking is some areas. I think smoking should be banned from all public places because of the disease that it can cause and all the harm it can do to people. People should have the right to walk wherever they want without being around the affects of someone smoking outside or worrying about having their life put in danger. If everyone make a campaign against smoking it can soon possibly get banned from all public places. I would start a campaign and try to get the attention from the government to have smoking banned so no one gets harmed or have to walk outside smelling the smell of

Read More
1150 Words | 5 Pages

References Eaton, L. (2003). United Kingdom finally bans tobacco advertising. BMJ, 326 (7385), 345-351. Harper, T. (2006). Why the tobacco industry fears point of sale display bans.

Read More

More about Tobacco Advertising Case Study

Related Topics

Open Document