ipl-logo

Fn's Rights In Canada

855 Words4 Pages

The way that peoples collective rights worked in the past wasn’t always through a fair system. In multiple cases, rights were given based off of appearance or status rather than one’s position. An important example of this is the First Nations history of Treaties and the Indian Act. When Europeans came to Canada, not only did they find land but a civilization with it. Multiple treaties were created between the FN’s and Europeans to help both groups so they can live in harmony. Unfortunately, it wasn't very long until the two perspectives began changing their path. Even with the treaties in play, the FN’s were treated unfairly with little respect. The Europeans decided that they were in control, acting oblivious to the FN’s way of life, and began backing out of the agreements. The Europeans had a new …show more content…

It was a way for the government to administer these ‘treaty rights’ to the ‘treaty people’ (Nelson,137). It was an overarching treaty that established treaty rights, restricting FN’s rights to participate, vote, take part in politics, travel, along with being able to celebrate and embrace their culture (Nelson,137). Aboriginal people spoke up and represented themselves, the result was Section 35 in Canada’s Constitution. Section 35 acknowledges FN, Metis and Inuit people as Aboriginals (Nelson,137). Proper collective rights were established in the Constitution for Aboriginals. The protest led to awareness and acknowledgment of the initial treaties and agreements. To what extent has the federal government affirmed collective rights in the legislation over time? Canada is different than any other country, including the United States, because of our collective rights. The purpose of them is so different groups of people can have an identity. Which overall, would create a diverse society with many identities which people can be a part of. Our history and the laws

Show More
Related
1826 Words | 8 Pages

Pros The outcome of the Accords was a legislative framework detailing matters relating to land, membership, financial accounting, and resource development. The Métis got to hammer out documents setting out the structure and powers of the settlement governments. A Métis Settlements Appeal Tribunal was also established, and they were given the right to create judgements relating to land usage, the membership of the Métis settlements, surface rights relating to the land base, and the jurisdiction over many other matters. It is a quasi-judicial body that is funded by Alberta Aboriginal Relations. The Minister and the General Council each appoint a vice-chair and two members, with the chair being appointed by the Minister from a shortlist of nominees

Read More
1172 Words | 5 Pages

Overall, this negotiation process reflected the complicated and dynamic relationships between the Crown and Indigenous peoples in Canada, and the ongoing challenges of reconciling the desires and interests of Indigenous peoples. The result of Treaty 6 is considered by many, including myself, to be unfair to Indigenous peoples. From the Indigenous perspective, Treaty 6 was not fair as it resulted in the loss of their traditional lands and way of life, as well as the loss of their culture and sovereignty. The Treaty was imposed on the Indigenous peoples without adequate consultation or compensation, and its provisions were often not honoured by the Crown. They also experienced many other negative impacts as a result of the Treaty, including the displacement from their traditional lands, the reduction of their hunting and fishing rights, and the erosion of their communities.

Read More
974 Words | 4 Pages

These are seen in the lessons that appear to be prevalent from the conference, on the importance of topics such as constitutional reform, federal-provincial relations, the Charter of Rights and Freedoms, and public opinion and political leadership in our country's politics. Each of these topics show themselves in our everyday lives, such as fights and debates over our rights as citizens on topics such as our education, as seen in issues like Doug Ford cutting funding in Ontario, or the debates on the rights of Indigenous peoples that have been happening for decades. “The Charter protects those basic rights and freedoms of all Canadians that are considered essential to preserving Canada as a free and democratic country.” The rights protected under the charter are our everyday rights, the ones that, in a perfect world, wouldn't need to be written down. Knowing now how this charter came to be shows the importance of the effect that patriation has left on our country.

Read More
496 Words | 2 Pages

Perhaps the most unsettle period in Canadian political history, the Quebec Referendum of 1980 and a vote to the remain part of Canada, led Ottawa to initiate a balancing program to promote Charter Rights, while protecting Quebec’s language and culture. The Meech Lake and the Charlottetown Accord were developed to address this situation. However, through a compare and contrast it can be deduced that the Charlottetown Accord provided the best balance for Charter Rights and Quebec’s need for a distinct society clause. During the 1960’s Quebec began to argue that it was a distinct society due to their language, culture and history.

Read More
1478 Words | 6 Pages

The Iroquois Constitution and the Constitution of the United States, written in 1787, have influenced the society Americans live in today. Many people do not associate the United States Constitution with the Iroquois Constitution (visa versa) because a large multitude of people don’t even know that Iroquois Constitution exists. Both documents have similarities and differences that are based upon human equality, personal rights, and security of self and state. Human equality was a huge deal for the leaders of the Five Nations; every rule was based upon individuals being treated with the utmost respect, as long as they earned it. Equality and fair treatment of the clans, doesn’t just fall to those who are native to the Nations either; those

Read More
998 Words | 4 Pages

When the Constitution Act was patriated, the role of courts in Canada changed significantly. The job of making sure that laws affecting individual rights are in accordance with the Charter now falls to them, and ultimately, the Supreme Court of Canada. Governments cannot pass laws that do not agree with the constitution - known as unconstitutional laws - because they can be stopped from ever coming into effect or getting ‘striked down’ by the courts. PM Trudeau had been a voice for a new Constitution since his first election campaign in 1965, in which he said, “I believe a constitution can permit the coexistence of several cultures and ethnic groups within a single state.” The Constitution Act of 1982 was also dedicated to shaping Canada’s independence.

Read More
1365 Words | 6 Pages

" In fact, section 51 of the Constitution allows laws to be passed to the disadvantage of Aboriginal people, and section 25 enables state laws to discriminate and disqualify people of a particular race from voting in state elections. Although America's older version of the Constitution may have had something similar to this, it is very different from the United States Constitution today because the people in the U.S. are very sensitive to discrimination and fourteenth amendment forbids that from

Read More
512 Words | 3 Pages

The Indian Act passed in 1876, and amended countless times, in its present state, is a portrayal of the complicated and problematic relationship between First Nations and Canadian Society, distinguished through power imbalances, historical injustices and problems, and current inequalities. Through its many conditions, laws, and arrangements, The Indian Act portrays paternalistic control, giving the Canadian government power and control over Indigenous peoples and communities. Further causing discrimination, and alienation, along with current and ongoing inequalities and power imbalances, further demanding reconciliation. The Indian Act passed in 1876, was an oppressive way to gain control of Indigenous people and Land and further assimilate

Read More
1136 Words | 5 Pages

The Métis leaders had many meetings where they were looking for ways to show the importance of their rights, they made a list of injustices happening with them, and they voted so

Read More
337 Words | 2 Pages

Collective rights are unique rights that are given to minorities in Canada and are part of Canada's constitution. The purpose of collective rights is to protect the collective identities of certain groups. These groups include Aboriginal people as well as Francophones and Anglophones. Citizen one is in favor of collective rights for minorities. He believes that the government should preserve collective rights for Anglophones, Francophones as well as Aboriginal people.

Read More
297 Words | 2 Pages

The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms is located in the first part of the Canadian Constitution and came into effect on April 17, 1982. The Charter is a document that outlines a set of constitutional principles that assist in creating a free and democratic country and is the most important of the laws in Canada. Some of the laws include: Fundamental freedoms (e.g. freedom of expression); democratic rights (e.g. the right to vote); mobility rights (e.g. the right to live wherever one choses in Canada); legal rights (e.g. the right to life and security); equality rights; language rights; minority-language educational rights and aboriginal and treaty rights. These laws guarantee the basic values of fairness, respect and tolerance for every

Read More
1219 Words | 5 Pages

Before the Charter, many people may argue that Canada was a free and democratic country. Canadians had the freedom of expression, equality and the principles of fundamental justice. What changed with the creation of the Charter was that rights and freedoms were given constitutional status, and judges were given the power to strike down laws that infringed on them. In 1982, most Canadians agreed that the introduction of the Charter was going to monumental. But on the contrary, over 30 years later, numerous laws have been struck down by interpretation of the charter and remedial techniques that have been developed by courts.

Read More
332 Words | 2 Pages

¬¬¬Canada is known worldwide, as a multi-cultured and accepting society¬¬¬. Canada is recognized as understanding of all genders, races, ages, sex orientations, and all religions. Canada shows this acceptance in the collective morals of society, but also in the legal system. However not every country is like Canada. Canada is a democracy so the belief is in being equal and fair, thus Canada put these beliefs into effect by creating the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms using the Equality Rights section.

Read More
1167 Words | 5 Pages

Unlike our neighbours down below. We have these special set of rights called Collective Rights that recognise three major groups of Canada: First nations, Metis and Language Minority. Canada also has the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms that was signed in 1982. This recognizes individuals and the collective rights in Canada. My first stamp shows the layout of Canada were Treaties 1 to 11 are on the map.

Read More
871 Words | 4 Pages

Throughout the history of the United States, there generally have been dozens of particularly social movements, which is fairly significant. From the African American Civil Rights Movement in 1954 to the feminism movement in 1920, protests for all intents and purposes have helped these groups basically earn rights and fight injustice in a really major way. Some injustices that these groups face range from lack of voting rights to police brutality, or so they essentially thought. The indigenous people of North America aren’t actually immune to these injustices, basically contrary to popular belief. Back in the 1968, the American Indian Movement generally was formed to for all intents and purposes give natives security and peace of mind in a

Read More

More about Fn's Rights In Canada

Open Document