The deconstruction of evil can be a delicate concepte to approach because evil can be seen as a bland subject but also as abstract area. The easiest way to separate good and evil is in a black and white definition by saying those that do something that is non-moral and non-legal such as stalking is evil. While good is the opposite, it is something that is approved of morally and legally; however this has just been a simple explanation of what evil and good are. The what is evil question is far deeper than a dictionaries definition; it can lead to are there singular actions, character, people and animals. Can evil be seen and can it be taught and developed over time. The greatest question asked is, whether evil is a genuine subject in history. The media helps the people describe what is and what is not bad for the community. As said by The Conversation, media has beneficial …show more content…
Ted Bundy and the Ripper became so well known due to promotion of media that their name or face has become an ideal of evil. News and media are powerful and important in the construction of evil and monsters of the public. Crime news coverage of what a monster is, is typically styled in an exaggerated order to bring the public. A journalist can make someone like E. Dorner more threatening to society than he is. BBC has it document of how many and who Dorner killed or injured; they have the information on how he died and what happened before that time. “For nine days, he brought terror to southern California as he pursued”, They made sure the people were aware of him being terrifying readers and changing making the view more aggressive. When the people read they determine and construct their own version of who E. Dorner is and this may make him into a monster and evil because he did something that is a moral and harmful to the people around