Reasoning Vs Intuition Essay

“ Thinking is a skilled work .it is not true that we are naturally endowed with the ability to think

Clearly and logically – without learning how or without practicing” – A.E. MANDER

By undertaking a literature review you can critically summarize the current known and available knowledge in the area under investigation, identifying any strengths and weaknesses in previous work, so helping you to identify them in your own research and thus eliminate the potential weaknesses, whilst bringing to the fore the potential strengths. In addition, a good and full literature search will provide the context within which to place your study.

The main importance of the literature search and review is that Everything in your research proposal flows from

according to her views on the topic intuition has 2 implication ,First one is that it cannot be understood if the viewer associates it with logic or views it in a logical Point . second that there is a contrast between reasoning and intuition and the conception of both these topics are dull or to much technical . if these points of view are assumed to be correct or has any value it suggest that if these points are sound we ought to jettison the fact that these two , reason and intuition are opposed or even wholly discrete ways of knowing and recognize instead of co – operation . She also assorted intuition with recognition and said intuition plays an important in cognition And gives a wide understanding to human character and reasoning , which will help us to attain a higher Understanding of reasoning and human behavior

Cohen and Eduardo B. And they wrote about various forms of intuition and has some link with behavior. According to them mood influences cognitive activity and behavior in systematic ways. they examine the role of such intuitive theories in guiding affect regulation in a series of four studies and have shown that even suboptimal hedonic adjustments (i.e., preferences for the negative pole of the affective spectrum such as negative mood maintenance) were deliberately chosen to match cognitive requirements of forthcoming tasks. We contrast affect discrepancy and strength of signal hypotheses to explain how affect regulation goals are