If Daniel Gilbert is correct, then you would be wrong. In other words, if Daniel Gilbert is correct, then you would be a mistake to think that a new car will make you happy in the imagination. You are wrong, and that a new kitchen will make you happy, and as long as you might imagine. You are wrong, I believe you will not have more is not satisfactory, a large single setbacks, a broken wrist, a broken heart), higher than the long-term and a smaller one (a trick knee, the tense marriage). You are wrong, it is assumed that job would be crushing. You are wrong, in the hope that the death of the family, will enable you to lose, year after year, forever forever. You may not even be a mistake to think that a cheeseburger you are ordering in a restaurant -- this week, the next week, a year from now, and it doesn 't really matter, will put the ball in the correct position. This is because, when it is how to accurately forecast you will feel the future, you will most likely be wrong.
A professor at Harvard University in the psychology, the Gilbert like telling people that he 's learning fun. However, in order to more accurately, the
…show more content…
Until recently, this is unknown. How can we forecast our sentiments, and is consistent with our forecast of future emotional state, has never been something of laboratory research. But in a few 10 of the experimental, the Gilbert, Lord WILSON H, kahneman, loewenstein made a conversion of the observations and conclusions was to undermine some of the basic assumptions: that is, we human beings understand what we want and are adept at improving our well-being, and we are good at maximizing our public utilities, in the traditional Economics of the terminology. Further, they are working to predict some disturbing, some more personal questions. Learn more about emotional projection, the Gilbert is that the research, does not know the all have you ever thought of life, and happiness, has been a somewhat naive, at least, in the worst case, greatly