Did you know that the average age to get a phone is 10? Officers should not be able to go through personal devices. However, officers should be able to go through personal belongings, only if they have evidence.
Going through other people’s things is an invasion of privacy. For example, teachers will not properly do what they are supposed to do. According to Akash Bagaria, “..the role of educators is to teach not to monitor kids outside of the classroom.” The teacher shouldn’t have to monitor the kids while teaching. It might become even more stressful than a regular teaching job. In addition, this law may be misused. According to Jim Tharayil, “using something else to pull you over and then using this to look through your cellphone.” Furthermore, they should have permit to search you. According to Justice Kathryn M. Werdegar, “ that police officers should have to obtain a warrant.”A warrant is required to search a person. It is stated so in the Fourth Amendment. So if this is correct, then police officers should not be able to pull people over, just to check their personal device. This is how I think using information from private devices is an invasion of privacy.
…show more content…
In Shafter, California, the police officers say that this policy is already been helpful. However, if they do this, it could be an invasion of privacy.According to Maria Shepard, “If the device is not school-owned and is not being used on school campus, schools should not monitor a student’s online activity.” They should also have a search warrant to be able to go through your