ipl-logo

Morality In Politics

1373 Words6 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Morality in society

Politics and Morality cannot be Segregated
(In Favor)
Morality is the essence of humanity. This aspect sets humans apart from other creatures and holds us liable for being corrupt. Politics is concerned with the citizens whether managing the state for the betterment of public or winning a position in power to govern the state. If it is not done in proper manner and with fair character then it would be better to scrap the morally high-sounding oath ceremonies of the ministers.
It is fanciful to believe that politics can be segregated from morality. The condemnation of slick politicians, protests against corruption and protests against unjust traditions are all testimony of morality in politics. Is death penalty ethical? Whether a person has …show more content…

Kings never wanted himself to be betrayed; this is nothing but morality. Cyrus II occupied Babylon and freed the slaves and allowed them to return to their homeland. He was praised for this act as a savior in the book of Isaiah. The barbarity of Emperor Shi Huang-Ti (226 BC) of Qin dynasty led to his overthrow and the Han dynasty was established for the next 400 years. The huge Islamic Empire stood at its peak – in terms of justice, art, literature, philosophy and science. But soon it became morally corrupt on almost all the fronts and gradually it degenerated completely. The rule of the kings was put to an end with the French Revolution (1789 – 1799). World witnessed a new order with the slogan of liberty, equality, fraternity. This shows how morality has been entrenched since the beginning.
In the contemporary era, as people have become more aware of their rights they demand more corrupt free politics on all the fronts. The dilemma is at what level morality in politics can interfere in every sphere of human activities as morality differs from person to person and society to society. If we classify this term into two categories, i.e., universal and descriptive, then it will be easy to deal with this …show more content…

However, still there are divergent views. When a particular party campaigns in an election, its moral issues are not hidden despite the members giving assurance that it would not interfere in politics. As Stephen Glover wrote for the dailymail, ‘you can’t separate politics and morals’ when local government minister in Britain, Ruth Kelly, member of Opus Dei which considers homosexuality as a sin, assured that her political views is what matter and everyone should be free from discrimination. Or, for that matter, political parties in India try to cash in on various issues from beef ban politics to uniform civil code – one party comes out as the sole savior of the diversity and another comes out as the sole custodian of the traditional culture. So, instead of changing reality this needs to be tackled. No party has a right to thrust its view upon the citizens by passing any type of draconian law. What needs to be done is to openly express the views, put it on the table, discuss, let opposing views not to be stifled and ultimately let the people decide. Let the status quo run as it is. At any time when citizens will feel, they are going to voice their opinion and gradually government will accept if majority wants; as it happened in Ireland where same sex marriage was accepted by popular vote in 2015. Let everyone have freedom and right to choose what they want in

Show More
Related
1325 Words | 6 Pages

The death penalty on the other hand would have been effective if the overall public minded to consider it a system for ending criminal acts. While a monstrous number would ensure the nonattendance of the death penalty in their real system, the wrongdoing rate continues going higher for countries that still practice the death penalty. Regardless, there is lacking accurate data to exhibit that death penalty has been convincing similarly as maintaining a strategic distance from criminal acts. It infers

Read More
1318 Words | 6 Pages

Russ Shafer-Landau provides us with two separate arguments about the death penalty in his academic book The Ethical Life, fundamental readings in ethics and moral problems. In the first argument, Justifying Legal Punishment, Igor Primoratz gives us substantive reasoning that opts favorably toward the necessity of the death penalty. Contrasting Primoratz, Stephen Nathanson, through An Eye for an Eye, provides us with an argument that hopes to show us that capital punishment, like murder, is also immoral and therefore, unjust. By the end of this essay, I intend to show that while capital punishment may not be the easy choice for a consequence and punishment to murder, it is, however, the necessary one.

Read More
758 Words | 4 Pages

Due to the release of the two kingdoms the unification of the two Kingdoms was untied once more. Cyrus the Great’s humanity was also recognized in the Persian Empire. Solomon rebuilt homes, sent sacred objects and rebuilt the temple he destroyed for the Jews that were enslaved in Babylonia. This showed that The Persian Empire could be dominant and deadly but, also be humbled and caring. Cyrus the Great also allowed Greek culture to the East.

Read More
531 Words | 3 Pages

In my opinion, for our government to work politicians need to listen to the people. The laws passed, the policies made need to be created with the people in mind. With that in mind, if a politician only tells the truth, then the public needs to recognize that the truth may not always be so good. For politicians to pander it may just sound like for politicians to "lie", which isnt the case. I think that politicians should stick to their own personal morals for most of the time.

Read More
698 Words | 3 Pages

At the point when managing Capital Punishment there are a wide range of strategies they use in the detainment facilities. Presently the act of the death penalty is as old as the administration itself. The death penalty is a legitimate infusion of capital punishment in which it is utilized for lawbreakers. As I would like to think, the demise of the criminal I think it rely on upon the individual whom did the wrongdoing and in addition the casualty family whom ought to have the capacity to see the crooks passing not the entire world. In the wake of perusing and doing research on the death penalty it has its genius and cons which will be clarify later.

Read More
744 Words | 3 Pages

This paper will serve to show that capital punishment is not, in fact, ethically permissible. I will argue this by explaining the government’s duty to its people, and how capital punishment is indeed a violation of these prima facie duties. 1. The government has a duty to protect its people from harm (including murder, abuse of power, etc.). 2.

Read More
1646 Words | 7 Pages

The topic of capital punishment presents a test of values. The arguments in support of and opposition to the death penalty are complex. In the end, this is a question of an individual’s values and morals. The topic requires careful thought to reach a reasoned position. Both sides of the argument are defensible.

Read More
330 Words | 2 Pages

At the heart of these debates is the question is the death penalty ever a morally permissible form of punishment? Is it morally right to punish or hurt someone, in addition, to putting them in a four by four room with bars and having

Read More
475 Words | 2 Pages

I have chosen Into Thin Air for my project because the main theme of this novel is Danger and Morality. I feel as there’s danger and morality in my city and around the world, with the natural events occurring. Into Thin Air is a great work of literature because of Krakauer’s use of imagery and symbolism to describe the situation of the mountain. Also, the plot is exciting, and it leaves the reader in shock on each page. The writer tells it as it is.

Read More
1634 Words | 7 Pages

Thesis Statement: Origin of Morality Outline A.Universal Ethics 1.Karl Barth, The Command of God 2.Thomas Aquinas, The Natural Law 3.Thomas Hobbes, Natural Law and Natural Right 4.Immanuel Kant, The Categorical Imperative B.Morality and Practical Reason 1.Practical Reason a.Practical Reason and Practical Reasons C.Evolution of Morality 1.What makes Moral Creatures Moral 2.Explaining the Nature of Moral Judgments F. Answering Questions 1. What is the origin of Morality: Religion or Philosophy? 2. What does religion say about morality?

Read More
1648 Words | 7 Pages

For as the politicians are, according to Article Three Section two in accordions to Romans 13:4, public ministers, not church officials, must submit to minister of the gospel at the House of God. Same as the ministers of the gospel must submit to the public ministers of the law in government, yet this does not mean they cannot mingle or express views in opposite

Read More
1463 Words | 6 Pages

J RAWLS, The Laws of Peoples-with the Idea of Public Reason Revisited, Harvard University Press: USA, 1999. John Rawls was an influential political philosopher and his publications are widely read. One of which is the Law of Peoples published in 1993 which is the subject of my study. In the Law of Peoples Rawls concerns of the general principles whereby one can uphold and be accept by the liberal people as well as the non-liberal society. “This principle is a standard for which can be useful in regulating the behavior of the citizens towards one and other.”

Read More
767 Words | 4 Pages

Why death penalty must end ‘’An eye for an eye makes the whole world blind,’’ said Mahatma Gandhi. The execution of someone who has possibly done a crime is an inhuman act. Death penalty is hypocritical and flawed. If killing is wrong, why do we kill when a criminal has done the crime of killing someone? In this essay, I will write why death penalty should end by writing about the violation of human rights, execution of innocent people, the fact that it does not deter crime and money.

Read More
1212 Words | 5 Pages

1 INTRODUCTION Power and authority are the most important aspects of politics as such way of thinking comes a long way from the earliest thinkers such as Plato and Aristotle to mention few. They are the fundamental features of state in politics, focusing on who should have the power and authority over the people and who should rule them. During the time prior and after the birth of states, political authority has always been a major concern with regards to who should rule and how and who shouldn’t. Therefore this issues need to be addressed in a way that will at the end benefit the society. Plato is the thinker or theorist who came with addressing who should rule in a political environment in what Plato outlined that only Philosophers should rule.

Read More
1612 Words | 7 Pages

Joey Cho Mrs. Middleton English 10 17 October 2016 Persuasive Research Essay Outline Introduction LGBT/ same-sex marriage is one of the most heated and controversial debates in our current society. Unlike the past thousands of years whereas marriage was defined as a legal union between a man and a woman, now the concept of marriage has been extended to a broader context. “Homosexuality” in most cultures is viewed as a disgrace, and it is often considered as a great sin from a religious aspect.

Read More

More about Morality In Politics

Related Topics

Open Document