ipl-logo

Essay On Mankind's Natural Condition

1623 Words7 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Political authority

Does reflecting on mankind’s natural condition help us to understand the circumstances under which political authority is justified?

Introduction
This essay is intended to raise analytical arguments, critics and understanding on if, political authority is justifiable under the circumstances of mankind’s natural condition. By mankind’s natural condition we mean ‘state of nature’. A look at Hobbes’ theories will be empirical in analysing the relevant arguments.

Irrational vs. Rational (how can this effect or contribute to a political authority under the circumstance of mankind’s natural condition)
Political authority sets rules of which all follow and obey. Without this kind of entity people will be in the state of nature. Hobbes argues, that in the state of nature people are irrational and self-interested, being irrational will be chaotic according to Hobbes. Hobbes considered people to be like machines that needs an operator in that without an absolute operator machines seize to function or serve their purpose as they are meant to be. “Men are continually in competition for honour and dignity, which these creatures are not”. (Hobbes, 1996[1651])

Since people put …show more content…

“Locke viewed society on a scale from subjugation to personal freedom and declared personal freedom to be the ideal. Hobbes feared anarchy” (Hillman, 2009, p. 2). But Like Hobbes, Locke agrees to a political authority but, he differs from Hobbes’ kind of political authority. If mankind’s natural condition in this circumstance is to reflect a justifiable political authority, Locke believes that, political authority, has to come from people, since mankind is rational and able to make decision based on his eternal morals, and the realities of alienable rights. Thus, "Freedom of Men under Government is, to have a standing Rule to live by" or, if in a state of nature, to be governed by "the Law of Nature". (Farr, 2008, p.

Show More
Related
165 Words | 1 Pages

Nowadays few people realize the value of education. In Andrew Brassksma’s essay,” Some Lessons from the Assembly Line,” describes how a college student understands the value of an education by working as a full-time blue-collar worker during the summer time. Often times, there are people without a proper education who are forced to take unstable and low-paying jobs to support themselves or family. But, many people who have access to education do not realize the privilege it is and often times take it for granted. In Andrew Brassksma’s essay,” Some Lessons from the Assembly Line”, he puts himself on the same level as other blue-collar workers, and this is significance to the author's purpose because he can appreciate his own situation to the

Read More
110 Words | 1 Pages

DeAndre’ Royster Simple,and Exclusive The natural state of mankind before forming a government. Hobbes and Locke both believed in a state of nature. They also both believed in a social contract. Hobbes wanted a government to protect people from each other.

Read More
559 Words | 3 Pages

Although, their views on the type of government and the natural rights of its citizens greatly differed, especially regarding the state of nature. The state of nature is an idea used in political philosophy that was used by Enlightenment philosophers. It’s a representation of human nature without society. Locke believed that “Men living according to reason, without a common superior on earth, to judge between them, is properly the state of nature.”

Read More
1053 Words | 5 Pages

There is no government, no authority whatsoever. Every being is born equal and share the right to do anything for their survival. His political theory was based off his idea that all humans are naturally evil and selfish. Hobbes said that this equality leads to war. “...a war of every man against every man.”

Read More
789 Words | 4 Pages

Hobbes and locke were two philosophers who two different ideas on the world and human behavior as a whole. Hobbes mainly believed that without any form of government people will always be trying to fight for power. On the other hand, Locke believed everyone is born peaceful but can be corrupted by society. Hobbes and Locke both had very different views on different human nature, the purpose of government, and both had a big influence on many different countries.

Read More
531 Words | 3 Pages

“In 1651, Hobbes wrote one of the most influential philosophical treatises in human history, Leviathan or the Matter Forme and Power of a Commonwealth Ecclesiasticall and Civil. Like his rival, John Locke, Hobbes posited that in a state of nature men and women were free to pursue and defend their own interests, which resulted in a state of war in which “the life of man” was “solitary, poor, nasty, brutish, and short. ”(“Philosopher who influenced the Founding Fathers and the First Principles,”

Read More
1602 Words | 7 Pages

In the condition of nature, where man is put at war against man, no security is conceivable and life is brimming with terror. In any case, two common interests empower individuals to get away from the condition of nature; Hobbes’ refers to them as trepidation and reason (pg.108). Angst makes man need to get away from the condition of nature; logic demonstrates to him a method to get away. Reason gives the laws that Hobbes creates, which constitute the establishment for peace.

Read More
956 Words | 4 Pages

Because he thought that people act in their own selfish interests if they are left alone, Hobbes did not believe that people should be trusted to make their own decisions”(Hobbes). Humans act like this in a state of nature, which is the name for a society that has no government, no rules, and everyone is granted equal power. Hobbes believed that the best government for our unruly and selfish behavior is an absolute monarchy. An absolute monarchy is when one ruler has all the power to make executive decisions. According to him, the people should give up all their rights to the monarch in exchange for

Read More
1591 Words | 7 Pages

According to Hobbes, a sovereign, whether the sovereign was placed into power by violence or force, is the only way to secure law and order. For him, if a citizen obeys the sovereign for fear of punishment or in the fear of the state of nature, it is the choice of the citizen. According to Hobbes, this is not tyranny; it is his idea of a society that is successful, one that does not have room for democracy. As a realist, Hobbes has a fierce distrust of democracy and viewed all of mankind in a restless desire for power. If the people are given power, law and order would crumble in Hobbes’ eyes.

Read More
1441 Words | 6 Pages

Both social contract philosophers defended different views about moral and political obligations of men living in the state of nature stripped of their social characters. The state of nature illustrates how human beings acted prior to entering into civil society and becoming social beings living under common legitimacy. The state of nature is to be illustrated as a hypothetical device to explain political importance in the society. Thomas Hobbes, propounded politics and morality in his concept of the state

Read More
1751 Words | 8 Pages

Locke's most important and influential political writings are contained in his Two Treatises on Government. The first treatise is concerned almost exclusively with refuting the argument that political authority was derived from religious authority. The second treatise contains Locke’s own constructive view of the aims and justification for civil government. According to Locke, the State of Nature, the natural condition of mankind, is a state of perfect and complete liberty to conduct one's life as one best sees fit, free from the interference of others. This does not mean, however, that it is a state of license: one is not free to do anything at all one pleases, or even anything that one judges to be in one’s interest.

Read More
1351 Words | 6 Pages

Hobbes holds that “it is impossible to subjugate a man without first having placed him in the position of being unable to do without another.” Thus, the lack of organizational interdependence in primitive society prevents inequality. Similarly, the lawlessness of early society makes conflict impossible: war “can exist neither in the state of nature, where there is no stable property.”

Read More
1740 Words | 7 Pages

Hobbes was an English philosopher, known through out the world as the author of “Leviathan” which is regarded as one of the earliest examples of the social contract theory. His writings were greatly influenced by the

Read More
941 Words | 4 Pages

The individuals eventually realise the futility of living in the state of nature and inevitably attempt to organise a society in which the sovereign, in order to secure peace and safe living, has absolute powers. Even if the sovereign, to maintain the welfare of people and their safety, sometimes requires various restrictions of their civil liberties, the individuals know that without being assured a safe and prosperous living they might not be able to experience those liberties at all. Here Hobbes idea of an absolute power emerges to be logical. Nonetheless, as Van Mill stated in his article frequently cited in this essay: “political power is necessary but because of this it is also necessarily dangerous”

Read More
1084 Words | 5 Pages

Thomas Hobbes proposed that the ideal government should be an absolute monarchy as a direct result of experiencing the English Civil War, in which there was internal conflict between the parliamentarians and the royalists. Hobbes made this claim under the assumption that an absolute monarchy would produce consistent policies, reduce conflicts and lower the risk of civil wars due to the singular nature of this ruling system. On another hand, John Locke counters this proposal with the view that absolute monarchies are not legitimate as they are inconsistent with the state of nature. These two diametrically opposed views stem from Hobbes’ and Locke’s different understandings of human nature, namely with regard to power relationships, punishment, and equality in the state of nature. Hobbes’ belief that human beings are selfish and appetitive is antithetical with Locke’s contention that human beings are intrinsically moral even in the state of nature, which results in Locke’s strong disagreement with Hobbes’ proposed absolute monarchy.

Read More

More about Essay On Mankind's Natural Condition

Related Topics

Open Document