ipl-logo

The Influence Of CSI: Crime Scene Investigation

743 Words3 Pages

On October 6, 2000, the televised series CSI: Crime Scene Investigation was released. The show was broadcast by CBS Television Distribution. With the airing of the show, the public began creating their own beliefs on the way forensic science is performed by legal professionals and how the cases are processed in court. Ever since the CSI series aired, multiple televised series have been aired such as Bones, Criminal minds, N.C.I.S, et al. These shows have begun to influence potential jurors into having certain expectations this is referred to as the CSI effect. The effect is described as “The CSI effect is a belief held primarily among law enforcement personnel and prosecutors that forensic science television dramas, such as CSI: Crime Scene Investigation, influence American jurors to expect more forensic evidence to …show more content…

In reality, forensic investigators are not always able to obtain evidence. Either they lack the resources or the criminals have simply become more cautious (Stockwell, 2005). This cautious behavior is speculated by Evan Durnal that possible criminals are using the shows as a way to “learn” how to commit a crime as well as reducing the chances of being caught (Durnal, 2010). With this type of behavior, the prosecution is left with minimal evidence other than eyewitnesses which the jurors have labeled as insufficient evidence. In addition, by having these high expectations jurors have begun demanding the prosecution to present more evidence. Jurors demanding for unnecessary forensic tests on cases where they are not needed. Cases are being acquitted due to what they consider lack of proof beyond reasonable doubt. these acquittals could be wrongfully done due to the CSI effect affecting the expectation of evidence the prosecution is presenting. The jurors demand for evidence is caused by false expectations of forensics testing that have not been developed

Show More
Related

Lindy Chamberlain Case Essay

978 Words | 4 Pages

The Azaria Chamberlain case is a reminder that the criminal justice system does get it wrong, with each error bearing its own human cost. Lindy Chamberlain’s conviction was based largely on the use of unreliable or improper forensic science during the

Read More

Field Observation Report Stephen Peters Trial

1163 Words | 5 Pages

They also explained how investigators and the detectives investigated the Peters car in quadrants where they take a wet swab and then dry swab to find any prints on or int the car. In addition they fumigated the car and wear orange goggles that help them find more prints and evidence that the human eye can't see. All of these scientific investigative evidence procedures can seem to be detrimental to Herring. However, we learned in class that the CSI effect has no meaningful impact between forensic science show viewers and non-viewers when it came to convict or acquit a defendant. Research suggests that the CSI Effect benefits the prosecution is a myth.

Read More

Andrea Yates Case Study

601 Words | 3 Pages

In order for the people whose job it is to determine innocence or guilt of a person need more than just expert testimony in the form of a long drawn out explanation. Videos, photographs, or audio recordings are all helpful tools when presenting a case to a jury. In this case with Andrea Yates, there was so much evidence presented that could either have a positive or negative effect on the outcome of the trial. Prosecuting attorneys gave the jurors quite a horrific scene to digest mentally.

Read More

Deconstructing The CSI Effect: Forensic Science And The Media

1731 Words | 7 Pages

Sometimes it’s difficult as well to have jurors who know about the case through social media so if they’ve seen similar cases on television or in reality they will quickly use that case to evaluate their verdict. At the same time this causes bias preconception throughout jurors mind during the case. According to two different sources, one believes that forensic technology is not the case of why jurors believe in forensic evidence, and the other believes is it true that jurors believe in forensic technology. According to Judge Donald Shelton, he says that these CSI Effect articles are primarily based off of lawyers opinions, they are not facts. The reason jurors expect carts aspects in courtrooms is because of the technology they carry in

Read More

Innocence Project Report On The Case Of Jennifer Moore Case

2099 Words | 9 Pages

In reality the memory can be affected by numerous outside stimuli and previous beliefs. Due to television, one of the most well know detective tactics in the police arsenal is forensic

Read More

Harmon V. Nesbitt

294 Words | 2 Pages

They allow the alleged criminals to have the benefit of the doubt that they are not guilty. I hope that you will give Steve Harmon the benefit of the doubt that he is innocent. With that doubt, you will be able to truly see Mr. Harmon’s innocence. Steve Harmon is not a monster and I have the faith that you will see that too. That is

Read More

Not Guilty: The O. J. Simpson Case

979 Words | 4 Pages

The first hole in the prosecution’s case came in the form of the substandard collection of evidence. Pictures of evidence were taken of the crime scenes without a scale next to them and this evidence was logged incorrectly making it impossible to link most of the evidence to any part of the crime scene. The LAPD failed to account for the amount of blood taken from Mr. Simpson and it appeared 1.5mL of

Read More

Canadian Criminal Justice System: Social Media Analysis

844 Words | 4 Pages

This may cause the jury to be indecisive between what the actual case and what the media portrays it to be. The amount of media released for cases creates a negative impact within the courts and makes it difficult for a fair trial. When juries are uncertain about a case or a suspect, they result to social media platforms and news coverage that will provide them with more information and depth into the case. ‘’But if the case unfolds in the media, by the time a case gets to court, the supposedly impartial jury (or even the judge) may have already heard information and allegations (not admissible by court standards) that have caused them to seriously prejudice the parties’’. (Nedim, 2014).

Read More

Galen's Influence On Medicine

394 Words | 2 Pages

Galen was one of the most famous and well known ancient physicians who was also a philosopher, even though most of his philosophical writing is lost. Although, his philosophical interest also showed in his biological science works. Galen made famous anatomical observation in most of which was primates. Galen was very well-read and combined his works with very interesting techniques in observing practices to put more of light into teaching medicine. He often combines his observations with the philosophy of Plato and Aristotle.

Read More

Murder Of Gaven Brooks Essay

444 Words | 2 Pages

Every day forensic investigators use tactics just like the ones that were discussed throughout the paper. It’s more than just looking for an admission of guilt, and interrogating potential suspects until they

Read More

CSI: Crime Scene Analysis

706 Words | 3 Pages

A number of criminal movies increases every year. There are dozens of films and videos where actors investigate various murders and catch criminals. After watching 21st episode of the seventh season of the "CSI: Crime Scene Investigation”, I understand that not every case can be solved easily. Unfortunately, I have seen some cases on TV where suspects have not been arrested even though they were guilty. In such cases, FBI agents begin to build their own idea of crime and even put it in the place of crime to think what they would do in the same situation.

Read More

Comparing The Salem Witch Trials And The American Criminal Justice System

478 Words | 2 Pages

Today, modern standards require the burden of proof be brought forth by the plaintiff, or prosecution in criminal cases. This means that the accused no longer has to prove they did not commit the crime, but the prosecution has to prove that all the evidence proves the accused did in fact commit the crime in question. Circumstantial evidence is not enough, but physical evidence, or forensic evidence is now required in modern courts for a conviction. Additionally, the modern standard when considering evidence, and for conviction is “beyond a reasonable doubt.”

Read More

Wrongful Convictions In Criminal Justice

539 Words | 3 Pages

To be fair, the purpose of most of the crime shows and films is not to convey information or strive for accuracy, but to be entertaining. If the underdog did not win or the victim did not get the happy ending, most viewers would be displeased. Crime is dramatized and romanticized in TV and film to keep the viewer intrigued and watching. One of the most overlooked flaws in crime shows is the logic.

Read More

Reasonable Doubt In Twelve Angry Men

1011 Words | 5 Pages

This is an important element when deciding who the best and worst jurors were. There were no facts as to who was right or wrong because we didn’t see the crime in question. All

Read More

Essay On Criminal Minds

1666 Words | 7 Pages

The show dramatizes the lives of many real cases where the majority of viewers are familiar with. For example, many people know about the case of the Zodiac the serial killer, Robert Berdilla, one of the most aggressive, bloody and torturing assassins who used to take photographs of his horrifying acts, and many other cases which are narrated in this show. According to the author of the book “The forensic psychology of criminal minds” Ramsland mentions that, “in criminal minds, we see not only the activity of crime scene analysis and reconstruction variety of criminal psyches.” (8) On the show psychopathic murders are portray as cold-blooding, lacking of rumour, and emotionless.

Read More

More about The Influence Of CSI: Crime Scene Investigation

Related Topics

Open Document