ipl-logo

The Influence Of The Pro-Long Forces In Louisiana Politics

296 Words2 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: Politics and economics of the 1920s

After the death of Huey Long, Louisiana politics were divided into two significant camps under the Pro-Long and Anti-Long forces. This philosophy of government became known as “Longism” and its vision was to split Louisiana politics right down the middle. The Pro-Long and Anti-Long forces were what we know today as Democratic and Republican parties. The point of the two parties was to establish balance between social responsibility and fiscal restraint. It wasn’t until the year 1940 the first Anti-Long governor was elected, Sam Jones. The characters of Louisiana politics during 1936 and 1950 can be described as corrupt and dishonorable but there were some officials who remained true to the people. It wasn’t until the assassination of Huey
Show More
Related
334 Words | 2 Pages

The Louisiana Purchase Dear Editor: I think that Thomas Jefferson and the United States Government should buy the port of New Orleans because they need the get the port so that we can trade and expand the United States. One of the vast reasons that we bought the hefty territory was that we wanted total control of the New Orleans port so we could further our trade. We wanted to be in total control of the port because they stopped our trade and we needed to import and export goods. Another reason was the we wanted the port so we could trade whenever and no one could stop out trade.

Read More
281 Words | 2 Pages

Prior to the Purchase of the Louisiana Territory, Thomas Jefferson was desired to explore the area to see if there was an all-water route to the Pacific Ocean and claim that land for the United States. The main goals of the Lewis and Clark Expedition was to map the region, collect information on new species, and to establish contact with the Native groups and make peace with them. In document 1, the map reveals that one goal of Lewis and Clark’s expedition was to find a waterway from the US to the Pacific Ocean. They did not find this route, but they did successfully navigate the Missouri River.

Read More
578 Words | 3 Pages

The war of 1812 contributed to the Federalist Party to disappear due to the administrations of Jefferson and Madison. The party transformed from a party of national power to a party of the privilidged. A huge contribution was the Louisiana Purchase and how I grew the size of the US and the three-fifths rule which was an issue, and it was more of a Western problem that it was of a southern issue. There was two main influences that impacted the Federalist Party to end. One was the Embargo Act of 1807 it was damaging to the people which left their lives and havoc and having harsh effects that left many Americans either in bankruptcy, jail , debt ,and even some were unemployed.

Read More
368 Words | 2 Pages

The Louisiana Purchase was the purchase of the Louisiana territory by the United States from France in 1803. The U.S. paid fifty million dollars and a cancellation of debts worth eighteen million dollars which averages to less than three cents per acre. The Louisiana territory included land from fifteen present U.S. states and two Canadian provinces. The territory contained land that forms Arkansas, Missouri, Iowa, Oklahoma, Kansas, and Nebraska, portions of Minnesota, large portions of North Dakota; large portions of South Dakota, parts of New Mexico, the northern portion of Texas, the area of Montana, Wyoming, and Colorado. The Louisiana Purchase was smart move by the United States.

Read More
191 Words | 1 Pages

I agree that Jefferson feared all southern states would be at Napoleon’s mercy if he settled in New Orleans. However, Napoleon’s intentions of the New World backfired as yellow fever, other diseases, and rebels revolting assisted in Napoleons decision to cut his losses. Furthermore, I also want to add that another reason the Louisiana Purchase came about was because Jefferson envisioned a country large enough for all descendants and felt the land of America allowed this, but Jefferson realized the nation’s current condition was too small. Therefore, he knew if he could somehow acquire rights to the land west of the Mississippi, it would provide people with enough land to prosper forever.

Read More
1057 Words | 5 Pages

Jefferson’s dilemma in the Louisiana Purchase In April of 1803 Thomas Jefferson was faced with many moral dilemmas in the process of buying the Louisiana territory. Though the price for the territory was beyond generous, Jefferson felt that by purchasing the territory he would be going against his beliefs that the constitution should be followed word for word. The constitution said nothing of the president having the power to purchase land from another government, or to use money of the states for the same purpose (“the moral dilemma”). Another problem was once the land was purchased, there was a fear that it could have been a waste since they had no way to know the layout of the land, and what it would be useful for.

Read More
992 Words | 4 Pages

During the Civil War, Missouri was a state divided not only by the Mason-Dixon Line but also by the population’s differing views on the morality of slavery and what side of the war the state was on. From this ambiguous and tenuous situation arose Jesse James – outlaw, murderer, bank robber, and folk hero. Because of the politics during Reconstruction, a figure such as Jesse James, with his personal history, was the perfect character to play both a perpetrator and a victim of his time. During the Reconstruction period of the 19th Century the wounds of the Civil War were still fresh among the residents of Missouri.

Read More
283 Words | 2 Pages

Political parties, Democratic Republicans and Federalists, started in the U.S. because of differing views of Alexander Hamilton and Thomas Jefferson, and the influence of newspapers. Jefferson’s and Hamilton’s different ways of thinking(mostly on issues that was beneficial for the country) played a huge part in the start of political parties. They fought about economy. Jefferson liked farming while Hamilton preferred manufacturing and trade. Interpretation of the Constitution was another thing they fought upon.

Read More
318 Words | 2 Pages

The vast territories gained with the Louisiana Purchase in 1803, opened up a slew of disputed between the North and South over the issue regarding slavery and its expansion west. The possibility of western states becoming slave states created the greatest debate of the nineteenth century. In 1819, there were an equal number of free states and slave states which maintained a delicate balance of representatives in the senate. However, when Missouri applied for statehood into the Union as a slave state it threatened to break the delicate balance and grant political representation in favor of the South. Desperately trying to prevent this balance from breaking, Representative James Tallmadge Jr. of New York, proposed a resolution to ban the transport

Read More
331 Words | 2 Pages

The two parties were the Republicans and the Federalists. The Republicans hoped government took a lesser approach to everyday life. Its individualistic perspective includes living in moderation, be tough, don’t spend more than you have to, and be honest. These lofty goals and ambitions were reasonable in the late 1700’s, early 1800’s, however, now most

Read More
305 Words | 2 Pages

Despite being the only major political party the Democrats experienced a lot of conflict among themselves Eventfully a party known as the Whigs developed. Both the Democrats and Whigs wanted to expand the numbers of voters. They accomplished this by eliminating several voting restrictions put on white males. Like the Federalist the Whigs supported northern merchants. Besides supporting merchants, the only thing members of the Whig party really had in common was there opposition to the Democratic party.

Read More
1540 Words | 7 Pages

“Jefferson Davis, at rest, an American soldier, and defender of the Constitution.” These words appear on the tombstone of Jefferson Davis (“Hollywood”). Many people would be surprised by this fact, as Davis is most widely known as the President of the Confederate States of America, and thus an enemy of the U.S.A. Davis’s accomplishments, however, go far beyond his time as Confederate President. To fully grasp this idea, one must look at his life as a whole, and not just the span of four measly years. Born to Revolutionary War veteran Samuel E. Davis on June 3, 1808, patriotism was always in Jefferson Davis’s blood (Williams 13).

Read More
1801 Words | 8 Pages

The Louisiana Purchase was a purchase of the Louisiana Territory bought by President Thomas Jefferson from France without saying anything to anyone except he had the help of Robert R. Livingston, and James Monroe, who went to France to make the deal for Louisiana Territory. Jefferson bought approximately 827,000 square miles of land for $15 million dollars. This was the biggest purchase that had been ever made. He thought this was the best decision for the future growth of the United States. This purchase of the Louisiana Territory seemed like a good thing for the United States, but not everyone was happy about it.

Read More
445 Words | 2 Pages

Another incident involving slavery that contributed greatly on the conflict between the north and the southern states was the DRED SCOTT DECISION. The Dred Scott decision is described by (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dred_Scott_v._Sandford) as “A landmark decision by the United States supreme court, in which the court ruled that African Americans, whether enslaved or not, could not be first class American citizens and therefore had no right to sue in Federal court and that the Federal governments had no power to regulate slavery. Dred Scott was an African American slave, taken by his master from the slave state of Missouri to the free state of Illinois and then the free state of Wisconsin. The master was moved back to Missouri, the slave state and he took Scott with him and later on the master died. The question at hand was should he be set free?

Read More
799 Words | 4 Pages

Texas Political Culture There are multiple classifications for political cultures Moralistic political culture- ones believe that the government should promote the public good and in order to ensure that good the citizens should participate in politics and civic activities Individualistic political culture- ones believe that the government must limit their role when providing to society in order to make the citizens able to pursue their economic interests Traditionalistic political culture- ones believe that the government should controlled by political elites and must be guided by tradition. Changes in Texas

Read More

More about The Influence Of The Pro-Long Forces In Louisiana Politics

Related Topics

Open Document