ipl-logo

The Majority Opinion In This Case Made Same-Sex Marriage Legal In All 50 United States?

1398 Words6 Pages

Question1: The majority opinion in this case made same-sex marriage legal in all 50 US states. Justice Kennedy gave four principals and traditions that demonstrated that the right to marriage is fundamental and should apply equally to same-sex couples.
The first principal was that everyone has the right to choose who they marry, which is part of the concept of “individual autonomy.” Justice Kennedy establishes that if the Constitution protects personal choices such as procreating, family relationships, and childrearing, then it should also recognize and protect the right to marriage. The second principal was that the right to marriage is fundamental because it is the most important commitment two people can make. Essentially, it is a right …show more content…

I believe that marriage and specifically the inherent choice of marriage is a fundamental right that all people have. If the Constitution protects choices that married people may make (contraception, childrearing, etc.) then why would it not protect the right to marriage itself. The historical significance of marriage also makes it a fundamental right. People have been getting married since the beginning of recorded history. Marriage has been part of every religion and every society. An institution such as marriage, which has such a large impact on society, must be a fundamental right. Finally, marriage is already recognized and even encouraged by all of the States. Married couples are provided benefits in “taxation; inheritance and property right;” hospital access; etc. Fundamental means “of central importance.” The historical significance and State encouragement of marriage clearly makes marriage “of central importance,” to both the people and the government, thus making it a fundamental right. Under the Equal Protection Clause, if a man and a woman can get married, then same-sex couples should also be allowed. Otherwise, they are being unfairly singled

Show More
Related

Case Brief Griswold V. Connecticut

624 Words | 3 Pages

These directors were claiming that the ruling that led to their conviction had violated the 14th Amendment, which states citizens’ rights to privacy and equal protections from the laws. Issue: Is there existence of a right in the Bill of Rights allowing married couples to use contraceptives to prevent conception? Decision: Yes.

Read More

Case Study: Obergefell Vs. Hodges

1334 Words | 6 Pages

The case looks to the Equal Protection Clause and the Due Process Clause to determine whether same-sex couples have the right to marry, and whether the right to same-sex marriage is a fundamental right. The case was decided and the judges ruled in a 5-4 majority that it is Unconstitutional for states to deny same-sex couples the right to marry, or to refuse to recognize same-sex marriages that were performed out-of-state. Justices that voted in favor of the decision are Kennedy, Ginsburg, Breyer, Sotomayor, and Kagan. The dissenting Justices are Roberts, Scalia, Thomas, and

Read More

Obergefell V. Hodges: Case Study

971 Words | 4 Pages

In my brief I will explore the effect of the Loving V. Virginia (1967) on the case of Obergefell V. Hodges (2015) and how it led to legalization of same sex marriage. I will prove that the 9th amendment which addresses the right to marriage did not specify that marriage should be between a man and a woman. I will also prove that the precedents set by prior cases reflected on the decision of the supreme justice. I will first explain the prior cases and discuss their rulings and reflect on the reason judges chose this. I will then discuss the Obergefell v. Hodges case and its similarity to prior cases .

Read More

Griswold Vs Connecticut Case Study

1116 Words | 5 Pages

However, Justice Goldberg took a more refined approach than Justice Douglas, focusing solely on the Ninth and Fourteenth Amendments. He argued that the Connecticut statute infringed upon the un-enumerated yet fundamental right of privacy in marriage, directly opposing the Ninth Amendment. When the Fourteenth Amendment was enacted, states were prohibited from "abridging fundamental personal liberties" guaranteed by the Bill of Rights (Griswold v. Connecticut). Justice Goldberg asserted that these two amendments in conjunction were sufficient evidence of the unconstitutionality of the Connecticut statute. (Griswold v.

Read More

Fifth Amendment Vs Doma Research Paper

169 Words | 1 Pages

: Per KENNEDY. In a 5-4 opinion the court held that Section 3 of the Defense of Marriage Act is unconstitutional under the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment. Justice Kennedy stated “DOMA seeks to injure the very class New York seeks to protect. DOMA violates basic due process and equal protection principles applicable to the Federal Government. The Constitution’s guarantee of equality must at the very least mean that a bare congressional desire to harm a politically unpopular group cannot justify disparate treatment of that group.”

Read More

Obergefell V. Hodges (2005)

2137 Words | 9 Pages

Hodges (2015) the Supreme Court held that the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment guarantees the right to marry as one of the fundamental liberties it protects, applying to same-sex couples the same as opposite-sex couples. This case was brought forward by numerous groups of same-sex couples who were suing their relevant state agencies to challenge the constitutionality of those states’ same-sex marriage laws. The Supreme Court found that there is no difference between same-sex marriages and opposite-sex marriages, therefore, the exclusion of same-sex couples from the right to marry violates the Due Process Clause. This is policy making because the Supreme Court forced states to change their laws by deciding that it was against the constitution to not only ban the recognition of same-sex marriages that occurred in states that allowed it, but also making same-sex marriage legal in all states. Government officials even those who do not believe in the law change must abide by it, by allowing same-sex couples their now legal right to be married and receive the benefits that opposite-sex married couples receive; changing the way that citizens and the government interact in societal ways but also financial

Read More

John Arthur Case

463 Words | 2 Pages

The next principle was that marriage is a fundamental right, and supports a two person union unlike any other. The third principle they looked at was the right to marry, not being conditioned on the ability , capacity, or commitment to procreate. Lastly, they found that, there is actually no difference between same and opposite sex couples, so they shouldn’t receive anything less than

Read More

Macalia Dissent Case Summary

1849 Words | 8 Pages

Justice Scalia of the United States Supreme Court produced a dissent after the decision made in Obergefell v. Hodges and expressed his reasons behind what he believed to be an incredibly poor decision made by the Court. In the dissent Scalia explains how the decision could be a threat to the way the American Government works and could have a serious effect on our future. Past decisions made by the Court as well as past interpretations of the Constitution are both a part of Scalia’s argument. These components of his argument all contribute to his overall strategy to in the dissent. To explain his vote against gay marriage, Scalia uses his knowledge of the US system of government and plays on the emotions of the US citizens who have a strong

Read More

Peace Without Dishonory: War Without Hope

359 Words | 2 Pages

Currently as we speak, Britain is fighting in a war. The British navy sent a number of ships to blockade the French from obtaining supplies in the United States, but some crewmembers of these ships deserted and sought protection with American authorities. The US navy decided to enlist these men, and so they associated themselves with the crew of the USS Chesapeake. On June 22, 1807, the British HMS Leopard prowled after the USS Chesapeake off the coast of Virginia. The captain of the Leopard then dispatched a letter insisting to explore the Chesapeake for British naval deserters, however the Chesapeake’s Commodore James Barron prohibited it.

Read More

Supreme Court Case: Roe V. Wade

1567 Words | 7 Pages

If liberty is not clearly defined, then it serves as a concept that gathers meaning from the changing economic and social facts that remain in society. The court has held that the “freedom of personal choice in matters of marriage and family life is one of the liberties protected by the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment.” Personal liberties extend to a women’s choice to have a family and if she decided to not have a family then it reasons

Read More

Elonis Vs United States

1600 Words | 7 Pages

Of the nine judges, all except Clarence Thomas made remarks and made inquiries, giving signs as to their positions on the Constitution and the fate of same-sex marriage. In ringing dialect, Justice Anthony Kennedy said same-sex couples regard marriage and "request rise to respect in the eye of the law." That right, he said, is granted by the Constitution. They came to the conclusion that the majority held that state same-sex marriage bans are a violation of both the Fourteenth Amendment Due Process Clause and Equal Protection

Read More

Advantages Of The Living Constitution Approach

391 Words | 2 Pages

Those who go by the living constitution approach agree that marriage cannot be denied to gay people because the

Read More

Conservative And Liberal View Of Abortion

1027 Words | 5 Pages

The debate around same-sex marriage was is a good idea to legalize it. I believe that same-sex marriage should be legal. I don’t think there is anything wrong with people of the same sex getting married. Now the concept of traditional marriage has changed and the power of love is more important than gender in my opinion.

Read More

Gay Marriage Persuasive Research Paper Outline

1612 Words | 7 Pages

Marriage is a contract between two people and honestly I think that the society should not be interfering this bond. Not permitting the right to marry another human is a severe violation of the human rights and freedom. James Carville “I was against gay marriage until I realized that I didn’t have one.” The statement is self-explanatory: “You don’t get to judge because you don’t have the

Read More

Marriage And Family Sociology

1412 Words | 6 Pages

Marriage mainly matters not just based on the family structure but the stability and quality of the involved relationships. The funniest thing regarding marriage is that love belongs to every individual. Marriage is fundamental evidently because gay couples are fighting for recognition and legality of their marriages across the globe for the same reasons. This is based on the need to offer care and protection to the loved ones as well as developing a more in-depth understanding of family. Marriages are the source of families and without them, the bound and the relationships would mean nothing.

Read More

More about The Majority Opinion In This Case Made Same-Sex Marriage Legal In All 50 United States?

Related Topics

Open Document