ipl-logo

Case Brief Griswold V. Connecticut

624 Words3 Pages

Griswold v. Connecticut, 381 U.S. 479 (1965)
Facts: Two plaintiff, Griswold and Buxton, were the Executive and Medical Directors for Planned Parenthood League at Connecticut State respectively. They had been accused and later convicted and fined $100 each for violating the Connecticut Comstock Act of 1873. The Act illegalized any use of drugs, medical item, or any other appliance for the purposes of preventing conception. Griswold and Buxton had been found quilt of giving information, medical advices, and counselling to couples about family planning.
These directors were claiming that the ruling that led to their conviction had violated the 14th Amendment, which states citizens’ rights to privacy and equal protections from the laws.

Issue: Is there existence of a right in the Bill of Rights allowing married couples to use contraceptives to prevent conception?

Decision: Yes.

Reason: Implied rights listed by the court included the Fifth Amendment, which offers protection …show more content…

The fee was to support the campus’ extracurricular activities and other campus services. The fee was also used to fund a number of organizations within the university including; Registered Student Organization (RSO), International Socialist Organization, College Democrats and Republicans among others. In April, 1996, Scott Harold Southworth and two other law students the university’s Madison campus sued the university’s student fee system. They claimed that the students were being forced to go against their will as far as the right of free association, rights of free speech and the rights under the First Amendment are concerned. The Federal District Court made a ruling in favor of Southworth and team on November 29, 1996. The court ruled that the fee system was against the student’s rights of free speech and were forced to pay for speeches that they were not in agreement

Show More
Related
231 Words | 1 Pages

The plaintiff’s argument was that the student’s suspension was unconstitutional and the confederate flag is a part of his heritage. The district court ruled the school’s dress code policy unconstitutionally

Read More
104 Words | 1 Pages

A recent federal lawsuit has been filed by the American Civil Liberties Union’s (ACLU) challenging the constitutionality of three provisions of the Setonia’s Abortion Laws. The three provisions ACLU are challenging are as follows (McCauliff): • Law which prevents state health officials from renewing or issuing licenses to abortion clinics located with 2000 feet of an elementary school (McCauliff). • Law which requires physicians performing abortions to complete 10 hours annually of continuing medical education on abortion procedures (McCauliff). • Law which requires abortion providers to give every patient a copy of her medical records, regardless of whether the patient requests such records (McCauliff).

Read More
1269 Words | 6 Pages

This shows that after this case study, it was established that US Citizens have the right to a K-12 education, one that is equally funded so that all students are learning on a level playing field. For this case study, the Texas Supreme Court established the right for students to receive a public school education Texas citizens have the responsibility to take action against an issue they find unconstitutional, either by voting or joining an interest group.

Read More
728 Words | 3 Pages

Facts This case arose out of the consolidation of Lemon v Kurtzman from Pennsylvania and Early v Di Censo from Rhode Island. In the two cases, the state had adopted laws that required the state to provide aid to church related elementary and secondary schools. The Rhode Island’s statute provided for financial support for non-public schools by supplementing 15% of teachers’ salaries. The Pennsylvania statute provided funding for salaries, textbooks and instructional materials for non-public schools.

Read More
660 Words | 3 Pages

“The students alleged that Westside 's refusal violated the Equal Access Act, which requires that schools in receipt of federal funds provide "equal access" to student groups seeking to express "religious, political, philosophical, or other content" messages” (Board of Education of Westside Community Schools v. Mergens by and Through Mergens). Many still argue today that Westside 's prohibition against the Christian club, consistent with the Establishment Clause, makes the Equal Access Act unconstitutional.

Read More
833 Words | 4 Pages

Jackson’s First Amendment right against school’s disruption, court should consider the nature of Mr. Jackson’s speech, by evaluating “manner, time, and place” in which speech occurred. Melzer v. Board of Education, 336 F.3d 185, 199 (2003). In Mr. Jackson’s case, it would be hard to argue that school had an interest in controlling Mr. Jackson’s freedom of speech. This is because the speech was held outside of school on a topic that was not related to Middleton High School. CT 4.

Read More
273 Words | 2 Pages

The U.S. Supreme Court has found that the Constitution implicitly grants a right to privacy against governmental intrusion. This right to privacy has been the justification for decisions involving a wide range of civil liberties cases, including Pierce v. Society of Sisters , which invalidated a successful 1922 Oregon initiative requiring compulsory public education, Griswold v. Connecticut , where a right to privacy was first established explicitly, Roe v. Wade , which struck down a Texas abortion law and thus restricted state powers to enforce laws against abortion, and Lawrence v. Texas , which struck down a Texas sodomy law and thus eliminated state powers to enforce laws against sodomy. The 1890 Warren and Brandeis article "The Right To

Read More
631 Words | 3 Pages

Good afternoon, your honor. I am here today on behalf of plaintiff, Chris Jackson, a student who has(had)an amazing future ahead of her, and whose life will forever be changed because of a principal who abused their power. Ms. Jackson is a very smart and outspoken young women who received a perfect ACT score, is ranked third in her class, is involved in mock trial, speech, was student council president. She is a very hard worker and saw something wrong in her school by the people who are supposed to be adults, and sought to take action. She was unfairly punished by a principal, [put insult of powers here] for speaking out and having harmless fun with her friends.

Read More
413 Words | 2 Pages

Connecticut (1965), the Supreme Court struck down a law barring the use of contraceptives by married couples. In Griswold for the first time the Supreme Court recognized that couples, at least married couples, had a right to privacy, drawing on the Fourth Amendment's protection of private homes from searches and seizures without a warrant based on probable cause, the Fourteenth Amendment's guarantee of due process of law in the states, and the Ninth Amendment's assurance that rights not specified in the Constitution are "retained by the people". Eisenstadt v. Baird (1972) expanded the scope of sexual privacy rights to unmarried persons. In 1973, the choice whether to have an abortion was found to be protected by the Constitution in Roe v. Wade

Read More
621 Words | 3 Pages

It is important to realize that Sanger’s campaign for a women’s to choose birth control was at a time when women where not thought of as equals and contraception was considered to be obscene at the time. In fact, she provokes a hostile reaction among Christian leaders that considered her concepts for birth control to be offensive and evil to society. Her advocacy work drew controversy from political followers that criticized her association with science to be immoral for seeking to improve or change the human population. She was often criticized and associated which eugenics, the branch of science that believed in improving the human species through selective mating. However her goal was to allow women to have control over how many children

Read More
1555 Words | 7 Pages

The Right to Abortion On January 22, 1973, in a 7-2 ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court handed down it’s landmark decision in the case of Roe v. Wade, which recognized that the constitutional right to privacy extends to a woman’s right to make her own personal medical decisions — including the decision to have an abortion without interference from politicians (Planned Parenthood). There are many moments in history when Roe v. Wade has been so close to being overturned, yet it is still in place. Abortion should stay legal, or not overturned, for the health of women everywhere. First, this important case took place at the time of abortion being illegal in most states, including Texas, where Roe v. Wade began.

Read More
1815 Words | 8 Pages

Schools have a responsibility to provide a safe and orderly environment for learning, but they must also respect the rights of students to express themselves and engage in political and social activism. The controversies surrounding students’ First Amendment rights have been apparent in our world for a long time, and the controversies are only growing with the growth of technology. There have been and still are many questions surrounding what the students are allowed to do and not allowed to do under their first amendment rights and that is what we are going to dive deeper into through the perspectives of many cases based on students' first amendment rights. There have been many famous court cases over the years in which students have taken school boards to court after they had felt that the school board or administration violated their first amendment rights at the school that they are attending. When it comes to students' first amendments there are many things that

Read More
482 Words | 2 Pages

The Carolina Classroom panel, which was sponsored by ETV, gave a different prospective on education in the area of dealing with court and legislation. The panel consisted of distinguished educators or advocates for education in South Carolina. Among those on the panel were Molly Spearman -Superintendent of Education, Senator Gerald Malloy, Dr. Helena Tillar –Marlboro County Superintendent, Dr. Eddie Ingram –Darlington County Superintendent, and Dr. Roy Jones –Clemson University Call me Minster Advisor. The discussion started with the recent South Carolina Supreme Court ruling in Abbeville County School District v. State of South Carolina, which was a 3-2 decision that decided that South Carolina will reexamine their education funding to poorer school districts, and the financial struggles of school districts in rural areas.

Read More
898 Words | 4 Pages

The case basically gave a general idea of abortion politics and how they would affect the laws of each state. I, however, do not agree with the ideas this case presents to resolve the issue, because to me, a woman should not have the "right" to abort a child. To make that choice is a "wrong," rather, since the child is to be considered living from the moment he or she is conceived. In the essay, "Morality as Anti-Nature," the author, Friedrich Nietzche, writes about how religious values inhibit other ideas from developing because they may be "radical."

Read More
477 Words | 2 Pages

The court case Tinker v. De Moines was a dress censorship case involving some students (Tinker) and the staff of the De Moines area. Tinker and his friends were suspended from school for wearing armbands that protested the Vietnam war. The students knew this was a violation of their First Amendment

Read More

More about Case Brief Griswold V. Connecticut

Related Topics

Open Document