More handpicked essays just for you.
Stanley milgram experiment brief summary
Stanley milgram experiment brief summary
Essay on milgram's experiment on obedience
Don’t take our word for it - see why 10 million students trust us with their essay needs.
In “The Genocidal Killer in the Mirror”, Crispin Sartwell argues that the average citizen can be convinced to commit atrocious crimes under the right circumstances from the premise that the traits to become a genocidal killer are not that uncommon, using examples from recent history such as the Holocaust in Nazi Germany and the Rwandan Genocide. Sartwell clarifies that although most people delude themselves into thinking that they wouldn’t partake in genocide if they were placed in a similar situation as many have before, it would take a “moral hero” (Sartwell 118) to refuse the opportunity given the circumstances. On the other hand, in “Just Do What the Pilot Tells You”, author Theodore Dalrymple claims that people's response to authority in respect to their obedience is what leads the average man to kill countless others. While both authors address the fact that it doesn’t take a malicious person to engage in genocide, Sartwell focuses more on the qualities that people who commit genocide commonly share, Dalrymple seems more concerned on how people react to authority in
The Nazi’s dealt decisively with people who protested in Maulthaussen. In one incident a man who was a quarry employee protested and complained to the townsfolk on what was happening in the concentration camps, so he was made an example off. He was sent to a prison camp for eight months. At this point there were few who had complained so the town’s people saw it to be safe if they just conformed to their new circumstances. The Nazi’s used fear to control the populace in Maulthaussen and turned them into bystanders.
1. What does King mean by “constructive nonviolent tension” and how does he define its goal? He means tension that allows for advancement and confrontation of the issue—here specifically about racism and prejudice. The goal of constructive nonviolence tension is to create a situation that is causing such so much tension that the opposition cannot ignore your cause any longer.
While most individuals reject the idea that a king’s authority reigns supreme, many individuals agree that authoritative figures do indeed hold a scared position, a position which requires respect and honor. The balance between the two lies in maintaining that the law, disregarding all the unjust aspects, necessitates obedience, and maintaining that the law only necessitates obedience when it does not go against one’s
During the 1960’s Stanley Milgram conducted a series of experiments to test how a person reacts to authority. He started these tests in response to World War Two and the reports of the German soldiers who claimed they were “just following orders’ when asked about
Society and government require people to be obedient towards authority, but is it always the best thing to do? During the aftermath of World War II many of the major leaders of the Nazi regime were put on trial for crimes against humanity (History.com). These trials were known as the Nuremburg war trials, were most of the convicted proclaimed that they were “just following orders” (McLeod 584). Being an accomplice to a crime is also against the law. In the Nuremburg trials, those accused were not breaking the law that their government had created, they were actually following it.
Deception from a moral viewpoint would be something that is seen as wrong, but in a study or experiment for research I think deception is something that is necessary to gain certain knowledge that we wouldn 't be able to gain using regular methods. Usually, the ends justify the means to a deceptive experiments and they usually have good intentions behind them. Many people may be angry after the experiment is over but it is shown that people enjoy an experiment with deception more than an experiment without deception; and people also benefit from them more, educationally. I believe deception is a necessary tool for learning about human behavior and human reaction. Deceptive experiments are experiments that really make you think when the experiment
In 1963, Stanley Milgram, a professor at Yale University, conducted a study on obedience to authoritative figures which focused on how far the participant would go to obey the experimenter even if they thought they were harming someone. He first assembled 40 male participants, ranging in age and occupation, telling them that the study was about learning. The participants even received $4.50 just for showing up (McLeod). Separately, each participant was introduced to another participant who was actually a part of the experiment. The experimenter then described the role of the “teacher” and “learner” in the study and made the participants draw to see which role they would take.
(Russell 2014) Conclusion: Despite controversy Milgram’s experiment was ground breaking. It remains relevant today and is frequently cited in demonstrating the perils of obedience.
In Milgram’s obedience study, Milgram wanted to see what could cause average people to carry out inhumane acts. Most people have a conscience, or some kind of moral compass to guide them in what is right and wrong. Most people would not harm or kill an innocent person. However in some cases, like the Nazi’s, there were once normal citizens carrying out horrible acts against other people. Due to this Milgram wanted to see if ordered by an authority figure a normal citizen would carry out an act that is normally against their moral agenda.
As a society, people who hard to say “NO” and have to obedience to the authority because of the status, public response and consistence. By persuaded to change one’s attitudes; for example, at home, school and work that people should obey with different one’s requests in every situation. In Gibson and Haritos-Fatouros (1986) research, the procedures used the foot-in-the-door phenomena try to persuade and indoctrinate Greek military police to invade their mind. Based on continuous training, no matter what the order is good or bad the police mind become reasonable since they have a strong, clear and extreme attitudes The police need to listen to the leader and follow their order. Due to Milgram’s Obedience experiments, when people need to obey
Obedience and Emotion "Rules are the obedience of fools and the guidance of wise men" (Harry Day). Although boundaries and guidelines are important for the success of a society, it is also invaluable to know the gift of freedom. If one is foolishly obedient and follows only the orders they are given, there is no growth for their future. People will start to become robots and will never learn some of life's most crucial lessons.
Anything is a double-edged sword and so does obedience. Obedience has many functions. Submissiveness to a authentic leader is indispensable to win a war, and also, it provides stability for a country. From another point of view, it will lead to chaos and confusions in an institution without obedience. On the contrary, submission also has some limitations.
Adaptation of Fahrenheit 451 to an argumentative essay Adapted by Emre Atatanır TR 111.01 People have struggled for power since they have started to live in groups. First, they came together, establish a system that would work, and then try to keep it stable. When they try to do that, sometimes they may think that the ends justify the means and they cut across all boundaries that block them. Therefore, to control the society, a ruler wants his subjects to follow him whether his decisions are correct or not and to do so he would try every plausible option.
Many studies have been conducted to ascertain why human’s behavior can be manipulated by authority. One such study, called the “Milgram Obedience Study”, conducted by Dr. Stanley Milgram illustrated how far individuals can be pushed by an authoritative presence. The conditions that these individuals experienced created a stressful atmosphere for all involved; however, many individuals stated their concerns but continued under duress. Is this displayed behavior a flaw in our thinking or is it that humans are hard-wired for obedience? Dr. Milgram conducted a study using multiple volunteers, these volunteers were referred to as “teachers” during the experiment, to administer electric shocks to individuals who answered questions incorrectly.
