The Moon Is Down Book Comparison

1984, The Moon Is Down Book Comparison The world after World War Two was a world full of uncertainties and fear for the future. These emotions inspired the writers at the time to ponder the aspects of the Second World War and the ideologies that arose after it. These reflections by writers have created several award-winning and timeless books such as Animal Farm, For Whom The Bells Tolls, and The Naked and Dead. Of all the retrospective books that came out of the Second World War, the most impactful were 1984 by George Orwell and The Moon Is Down by John Steinbeck. The two novels were both written in the shadow of the Second World War and take several story beats from the events of the war. The novels both explore the idea of war and the ideologies

In 1984 the story is told through the perspective of the main character, Winston, while in The Moon Is Down the story is told from a third person perspective. 1984 is written in first person because it is deeply focused on the physiological manipulation and personal story of the main character, Winston. The Moon Is Down is written in the third person so it can show the perspectives of the townsfolk and the occupying forces. The Moon Is Down uses the third person to help humanize the antagonists of its story, while 1984 sticks to the first person to help explore the world through the eyes of its main character. Another major difference between 1984 and The Moon Is Down is the tone of their story. In 1984, the tone can only be described as oppressive. The oppressive tone helps show the reader how the government is always watching Wilson and that there is no way to fight against the government. The tone of The Moon is Down is best described as quiet and cold. The tone helps bring out the growing tension between the civilians by creating a contrast between the tense environment and the calm, cold