ipl-logo

The Most Controversial Decision, By Wilson D. Miscamble

582 Words3 Pages
bulb-icon

Recommended: The effect of the atomic bomb on japan

Wilson D. Miscamble offers a clear and concise argument in favor of the use of the atomic bombs in The Most Controversial Decision: Truman, the Atomic Bombs and the Defeat of Japan. The title itself suggests at his main argument that the use of the atomic was necessary as a tool to defeat Japan. This argument will be reiterated many times throughout the book, with much evidence borrowed from other scholars who are on his side in this very popular debate. Miscamble takes much of the book to defend not only the bombings but also Truman’s role in them. By painting him as a passive politician who inherited the decisions that were to be made, the blame on Truman is lessened. The argument presented by Miscamble leaves the reader without any doubt that the use of the atomic bomb was necessary to end the war with Japan as quickly as …show more content…

Miscamble closely follows the steps taken in the Roosevelt administration towards a bomb to help the reader better understand the situation that President Truman inherited. Also, Miscamble emphasizes the roles that other key politicians like Henry Stimson and James Byrnes, played in the dropping of the atomic bombs and their aftermath. Byrnes, who Miscamble is seemingly enamored of, is of special importance to Miscamble’s argument as it was his decision to drop the bomb on a civilian population without prior warning. (NEED CITE PG 43) Of course, this element of the event is the matter of much debate. Miscamble makes a point to explain how, at the time, there was very little controversy within those in charge over the use of the atomic bomb. There were many obstacles in the way of a successful atomic attack on japan, but not present at that time was a moral obstacle. Finish chronology story info in next few

Show More
Related

Prompt And Utter Destruction Summary

1394 Words | 6 Pages

Walker does not just take the reader on a tour of the decision-making process of President Truman and shows what made him to order the use of Atomic bombs on Japan, but he also provide an exploration of the historical situation that prompted the decision. He also examines the viewpoint of the Japanese, not only regarding the impact of the bombings on their ultimate decision to surrender, but also how their Allies called for an unconditional surrender. This call could possibly have led to the Japanese Emperor, Hirohito, being tried on counts of war crimes, which may have possibly made the Japanese to be reluctant on surrendering even in light of a crushing defeat (Huczko). Samuel Walker also provides useful insights into contribution made by the decision to use Atomic weapons on Japanese decision to surrender.

Read More

Summary Of Leo Szilard's Last Resort

715 Words | 3 Pages

However, if Japan was offered the opportunity to surrender and refused, then the decision to use the bomb should be reassessed (Szilard, “A Petition”). “A Petition to the President of the United States” by Leo Szilard provides a strong claim against the use of the atomic bomb supported by establishing credibility,

Read More

Rhetorical Analysis Of The Winning Weapon? By Author Ward Wilson

609 Words | 3 Pages

In The Winning Weapon? : Rethinking Nuclear Weapons in Light of Hiroshima, author Ward Wilson attempts to make the argument that Japan did not surrender from WWII because of the atomic bombing of Hiroshima. But rather that the invasion of the Soviet Union was the deciding factor in their withdraw. He then uses this argument to indicate that our views on nuclear weapons, and how they affected Japan’s military decisions is incorrect. Wilson begins his argument looking at the Japanese’s military and political standing prior to the bombing of Hiroshima.

Read More

How Did The Potsdam Conference Dbq

1062 Words | 5 Pages

(source 2)AKA THE AMERICAN PEOPLE WERE AGAINST THE DECISION EVEN THOUGH THEY WANTED THE WAR TO END They wanted a quick end to the war and agreed that the use of the atomic bombs would be an effective method but they believed it was unjustified to do so on Japan.(source 2) Unless the details of the attack were made public and Japan was given an opportunity to surrender, the atomic bomb attack would not be justified. (source 2) The sheer possibility of the use of atomic bombs would be enough to keep Japan at bay.(source 2) “The added material strength which this lead gives to the United States brings with it the obligation of restraint and if we were to violate this obligation our moral position would be weakened in the eyes of the world and in our eyes. ”(source

Read More

Was The Us Justified Dbq Research Paper

776 Words | 4 Pages

Although this atomic bomb appeared to be needed, it was seen to be an immoral instrument of destruction by many. The Nippon Times had stated, “This is not war; this is not even murder, this is pure nihilism. This is a crime against God and humanity which strikes at the very basis of moral existence” (David M., 419). In addition, there was no advantage of hurling the bomb without announcing the possession of it to Japan. Through this announcement, Japan may have been more aware of the true power America had and may have resulted in them surrendering (David M., 421).

Read More

Examples Of Unnecessary Action In Ww2

872 Words | 4 Pages

Danielle Massauro Ms. Tarantino Modern American History 1/12/23 Unnecessary action Throughout World War II the tension between the United States and Japan was undeniably strong. The tension between the two greatly increased on December 7th, 1941 when Japanese armies invaded Pearl Harbor and dragged the United States into the war despite the states attempt to remain neutral. After Japan had attacked Pearl Harbor, The United States was now fully involved in the war and was desperate to find a defense mechanism that would help them defeat Japan. Soon, they started the Manhattan project, which was the codename for an American scientist effort to develop an atomic weapon to unleash on Japan. President Harry Truman, who had just recently come into office after the passing of Franklin Roosevelt, was not aware of the creation of the atomic bomb and was surprised with the invention of it.

Read More

How Did Truman's Decision To Drop The Atomic Bomb Dbq

719 Words | 3 Pages

The Bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki Harry S. Truman’s decision to drop the atomic bomb is one of the biggest and deadliest controversial turning points in history. America’s president, Truman, decided that on August 6, 1945, the atomic bomb would be dropped on Hiroshima and Nagasaki to end World War II. President Truman’s choice to drop the bomb on Japan was considered one of the most debatable turning points. The settlement to drop this bomb was a wrong decision because this bomb killed more than 70,000 innocent people with 10,000’s dying later. Also, bombing a country that was going to surrender in a few months would not be necessary, and last but not least, the atomic bomb could give ideas for the world to start nuclear warfare.

Read More

Leo Szilard's 'A Petition To The President Of The United States'

832 Words | 4 Pages

The success of the petition lies in the ability of the author to convey his position on the use of the atomic bomb while at the same time acknowledging that situations exist where he may have to change this position. He skillfully appeals to the emotion of the reader by showing the history of the war and how the current efforts are getting dangerously close to the same tactics that the United States had previously condemned. The ability to obtain such a large support for the petition might be the authors greatest success in support of the

Read More

How Did The Us Make Decisions About The Atomic Bomb Dbq

732 Words | 3 Pages

The U.S. carelessly made decisions about the atomic bomb and how it would be used. The United State’s main focal point was to assure that Japan will surrender but the U.S. never thought about the outcomes and how it would affect Japan. Doc A states, “Truman believed that it was his duty as president to use every weapon available to save American lives.” This reveals how the president selfishly made this decision thinking only about his nation’s safety while not even considering the lives that would be deeply affected in Japan. Document A again explains how American officials were already debating on how to use the atomic bomb without even knowing how this powerful bomb would work.

Read More

The Manhattan Project Truman Pros And Cons

1030 Words | 5 Pages

Controversial?.... Heartless? President Harry S. Truman has made the toughest decision that anyone in this world has ever made. Whether sacrificing millions of American lives thousands of warships, planes and killing millions of Japanese lives. Verses sacrificing thousands of japanese civilians.

Read More

Atomic Bomb Dbq Essay

611 Words | 3 Pages

In an attempt to get Japan to surrender to the Allies, in August 1945, the United States dropped two atomic bombs on the nation. The first bomb was dropped on Hiroshima and the second on Nagasaki. Although these bombs did contribute to Japan’s surrender and the end of the war, the use of this atomic weapon was an irrational and horrible decision. The United States should have abstained from using the two atomic bombs on Japan for the sake of civilian lives and possible alternatives to their decision. These bombs not only had detrimental effects on Japan, they also led to an arms race amongst several nations.

Read More

How Did Truman Use The Atomic Bomb Persuasive Essay

833 Words | 4 Pages

One reason, they argue atomic bomb should not have been used is, of the many people that were killed by the bomb, many were Japanese women, children and elder. They were innocent people, who were not involved in the war. Another reason experts disagree with Truman is it is said that Japan was ready to surrender. They believe Japan was "on their knees" and the bomb was unnecessary. (ushistory.org) Experts say the bombing was racist.

Read More

Atomic Bomb Dbq Essay

676 Words | 3 Pages

Was America right to use atomic weapons against Japan? The dropping of the atomic bomb in Japan at Hiroshima and Nagasaki, was the end of WWII. However, there has been much conflict considering the use of the bomb. In this essay, I will discuss reasons from both sides of the argument and justify my opinion.

Read More

Was The Atomic Bomb Justified Dbq Essay

808 Words | 4 Pages

It was completely necessary for the United States to drop the atomic bombs on Japan to end World War II. It’s still very controversial as to if this bomb really did limit the casualties that could would have occurred if the US didn’t drop the

Read More

Rhetorical Analysis Of Truman's Announcement Of The Atomic Bomb

630 Words | 3 Pages

Imagine living in a period in which the realities of war encased the world, and the lethal potential to end all suffering was up to a single being. During World War II, tensions between Japan and the United States increased. Despite pleas from US President, Harry Truman, for Japan to surrender, the Japanese were intent on continuing the fight. As a result, Truman ordered the atomic bomb, a deadly revolution in nuclear science, to be dropped on the towns of Nagasaki and Hiroshima. President Harry Truman, in his speech, “Announcement of the Dropping of the Atomic Bomb,” supports his claim that the dropping of the A-bomb shortened the war, saved lives, and got revenge by appealing to American anger by mentioning traumatic historical events and

Read More

More about The Most Controversial Decision, By Wilson D. Miscamble

Related Topics

Open Document