ipl-logo

The Manhattan Project Truman Pros And Cons

1030 Words5 Pages

Controversial?.... Heartless? President Harry S. Truman has made the toughest decision that anyone in this world has ever made. Whether sacrificing millions of American lives thousands of warships, planes and killing millions of Japanese lives. Verses sacrificing thousands of japanese civilians. This decision was on the shoulders of President Truman. It was on him to decide if The United States were to invade Japan and have millions and millions of lives fall or kill thousands by dropping the newly designed atomic bomb on Japan. The Manhattan Project proved successful when the atomic bomb was first tested exploding at the trinity test site in Los Alamos, New Mexico. After finding the success of the project the only thing needed was the decision …show more content…

They were going to invade a country taught to die rather than to surrender. The japanese were ruthless fighters and were not scared to die. The Japanese had kamikaze suicide pilots who turned their planes into guided missiles. Truman and Americans new the cost of an invasion would be extremely high. With warning president Truman decided to drop the bomb. Not surprisingly one bomb wasn't enough for Japan's surrender it took Two atomic bombs. I believe the decision to drop the bomb was right. The world was divided on a life saving decision to drop the atomic bomb many people believed it was a wrong, that it wasn't necessary to drop such a devastating weapon but the dauntless decision of dropping the weapon was a brave and right decision it didn't just save millions of American lives it saved millions of Japanese lives as well. Truman even warned Japan before dropping the bomb. But the Japanese were in human and taught not to surrender so the decision to drop the bomb helped end World War II and saved Millions of lives from …show more content…

If the the attack never happened we could be living in a completely different world right now. President Roosevelt needed a reason to be drawn into the war and killing thousands of American lies drawed us in. The Americans favored the allies in many ways but coming from World War I the US didn't want to have anything to do with World War II. If the attack on Pearl Harbor didn't occur the war would of gone in a different way. Once the US entered the war a year later they were dominating the Pacific after the Battle of Midway the US took out 4 of Japan's aircraft carriers and turned the war around. Without the US being in the war the japanese could of turned their attention around and helped focus their attention to helping the Nazis. Without US involvement in the war the axis powers would've definitely dominated the war. The allies were in desperate need of help and the Battle of Normandy and the final battles of the war show how much impact that we

Show More
Related

Pros And Cons Of Truman And The Use Of Atomic Bombs

642 Words | 3 Pages

But he had no compelling reason to do so. The bomb provided a promising way to bring about a prompt Japanese surrender without the disadvantages of other alternatives, and in Truman’s mind, its use did not require a lengthy consideration” (Walker pg. 96). After the bombs were dropped on the Japanese cities of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, people decided that the bombs were actually required. The people thought that if the bombs weren’t dropped, thousands of American lives would have died while America invaded Japan. The problem with this logic is that many people died in those bombings.

Read More

What If Germany Dbq

1143 Words | 5 Pages

Another potential reason that they chose to bomb the United States is that Japan had been the biggest naval power only to the exception of the United States. Japan would have wanted to beat their competition and get the honor of being the best. They chose Pearl Harbor because their goal was to take a hit at the American foundation by ruining their military base. Their original target was the aircraft carriers, but most of them were not there that day, so they had to go with Plan B and continue the attack on the battleships. They attacked on December 7, 1941 and they destroyed 18 ships as well as 300 aircrafts.

Read More

Was Truman Animal Testing Justified

443 Words | 2 Pages

By the time Truman had to make his decision Japan’s military resources were eliminated (Blum 2). Not only were there naval ships and planes destroyed, but also, there “lifeline to oil was severed” (Blum 2). Additionally, the amount of firebombing taking place left Japan defenseless (Blum 2). The man in charge of air attacks, General Curtis Lemay even went as far to say that “there was nothing left of japanese cities but “garbage can targets”(Blum 2). All of these circumstances lead up to what would have been the surrendering of Japan before the bombs were dropped.

Read More

Should Harry S. Truman Have Dropped The Atomic Bomb Persuasive Essay

688 Words | 3 Pages

The dropping of the atomic bomb was a pivotal moment of U.S. history. Harry S. Truman was put under a lot of pressure and spent a lot of time trying to decide whether to drop the bomb on Hiroshima and Nagasaki or not. There were many people telling Truman reasons why he should or should not drop the bomb as well. As for my opinion, I think that Harry S. Truman should not have dropped the bomb. The atomic bomb is dangerous and, in my opinion, should not have even been made in the first place because of how life threatening it is.

Read More

How Did Harry Truman Make The Right Decision To Drop The Atomic Bomb

378 Words | 2 Pages

Paul Ryan once said, “If we don't make tough decisions today our children are going to have to make much, much tougher decisions tomorrow.” This is relevant to Harry Truman’s decision to drop the atomic bomb because he had to make a difficult decision that affected many people and their children. Harry Truman made the right decision in dropping the atomic bomb. The atom bomb should have been dropped because it saved millions of American lives. Also, the atomic bomb was an extreme form of revenge for the attack of Pearl Harbor.

Read More

Truman Should Have Dropped The Atomic Bomb Persuasive Essay

332 Words | 2 Pages

In August of 1945 Truman had to make a huge decision, this was whether to drop the atomic bomb or not to. Truman ultimately decided in the end to drop the bomb on Nagasaki on August 6th, 1945. Truman should have dropped the Atom bomb because it ended a bloody war and began an era of peace for the world, and because a land invasion of Japan would have resulted in countless American deaths. Dropping the bomb ended an insanely bloody war. More than 70 million people were killed during World War 2, and invading Japan would have caused even more people to die (Fallen).

Read More

Why Was Truman Dropped The Atomic Bomb?

363 Words | 2 Pages

New to the presidential office, Truman was presented with the decision of whether to drop the atomic bomb, a choice that today is viewed as controversial, but which at the time was well-received by an American population tired of war. The unexpected death of beloved president FDR placed a difficult burden on Truman to fulfill the expectations of the public when he was inadequately prepared or informed. Thus, he refrained from interrupting the existing plans put into place by the predecessor he admired so greatly, and allowed the momentum of the atomic bomb to continue. Additionally, the amount of resources devoted by the American and British governments to the development of the atomic bomb made Truman reluctant to halt the operation at its

Read More

Should We Have Dropped The Atomic Bomb Persuasive Essay

852 Words | 4 Pages

In fact, Ralph A. Bard, Undersecretary of the Navy wrote to Secretary of War Stimson in a June 27, 1945 memorandum. “I define this decision as an emotional and reckless decision, Japanese government may be searching for some opportunity which they could use as a medium of surrender” (Bard). In fact, the Japanese government expressed desire to end the war, and would have accepted conditional surrender before the mainland invasion in November. The reason for dropping the bomb was forcing Japan to surrender unconditionally. In America’s opinion, Japan had lost the war; they did not have any capital to negotiate with.

Read More

Pearl Harbor Persuasive Essay

992 Words | 4 Pages

At the time, many Americans were strongly opposed to the idea of entering the war. They remembered the horrifying scenes of World War , they could not reimagine sending their sons and daughters to fight in another World War. If Japan Had not attacked Pearl Harbor, it may be possible that this opposition would have grown even stronger. This would have made it even more difficult for Roosevelt to convince the public and Congress to declare war. Meaning, if Japan had no attacked Pearl Harbor, the United States wouldn’t of had the public support needed to join the

Read More

The Effect Of Japan's Attack On Pearl Harbor

317 Words | 2 Pages

Japan’s attack on Pearl Harbor changed the fate of the war. This single attack brought the United States into World War II. For two years before this attack America didn’t fight in this war, but this attack ultimately changed the outcome of the war. For the first two years the United States did not fight in World War II, but they did supply resources to allies.

Read More

Pearl Harbor Narrative Essay

979 Words | 4 Pages

While much of America’s naval force were destroyed as well as America sustaining heavy casualties, the U.S. joining the war sealed the Axis Powers’ fate. “The Japanese had wanted to goad the United States into an agreement to lift the economic sanctions against them; instead, they had pushed their adversary into a global conflict that ultimately resulted in Japan’s first occupation by a foreign power.” (History.com) Japan’s overestimation for our ability to give up after an aggressive attack was what worsened their situation from an economic crisis to a national security threat. Additionally, while it is obviously unknown when or if the U.S. would have joined WW2 without being provoked at Pearl Harbor, they still would have had a big effect in helping the Allied Powers. “Totaling $11.3 billion, or $180 billion in today’s currency, the Lend-Lease Act of the United States supplied needed goods to the Soviet Union from 1941 to 1945 in support of what Stalin described to Roosevelt as the ‘enormous and difficult fight against the common enemy — bloodthirsty Hitlerism.’

Read More

Argumentative Essay On Dropping The Atomic Bomb

863 Words | 4 Pages

However, the Japanese were committed to fight to the bitter end of the war and see it all the way through, regardless of the fact that the United States demanded unconditional surrender from the small country of islands. This further emphasizes that since the Japanese were not simply going to give up, Truman came to the conclusion that in order to save millions of lives, he had to take thousands. President Truman decided to drop the atomic bomb on Japan to warn the world about the new found power of the United States, force an unconditional surrender of the Japanese, and save millions of lives. With the controversy over whether or not Truman should have dropped the bomb, some consider the decision irrational and unnecessary.

Read More

The Importance Of Dropping The Atomic Bomb

149 Words | 1 Pages

I believe President Truman was correct to use the bombs on Japan because there was only one other option, invasion. If the US

Read More

The Atomic Bomb Argumentative Essay

581 Words | 3 Pages

President Truman and his associates believed that if they dropped the bomb they would receive surrender from Japan. Thus, saving millions of American lives, and ending the war. Nevertheless, by saving American lives they would sacrifice thousands of Japanese civilians. They had other idea to have Japan to surrender, but were willing to take the one that would have the most consequences. They were thinking too much about the US instead of creating actually peace within the nations.

Read More

Ernest Gellner's Theory Of Nationalism

2145 Words | 9 Pages

Moving on to the idea of nationalism, Ernest Gellner (1997) understood nationalism as a product of industrial society. He defines nationalism as “primarily a political principle, which holds that the political and national unit should be congruent” (Guibernau and Rex 1997: 52). Nationalism, Gellner says is either a product of feeling of anger when the principle discussed above is not fulfilled or a product of feeling of satisfaction aroused by its fulfilment. Therefore, “nationalism is a theory of political legitimacy” (Guibernau and Rex 1997: 52). Gellner justifies the repercussions of the idea of “nationalism is a theory of political legitimacy” by discussing how the political effectiveness of national sentiment impairs the sensibility of the nationalists to realise the wrong committed by the nation.

Read More

More about The Manhattan Project Truman Pros And Cons

Related Topics

Open Document